| Literature DB >> 27904751 |
Bita Eslami1, Hossein Malekafzali1, Noushin Rastkari2, Batool Hossein Rashidi1, Abolghasem Djazayeri3, Kazem Naddafi2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that persistent organic pollutants (POPs) may contribute to pre-eclampsia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) and Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs) as POPs with pre-eclampsia.Entities:
Keywords: Case–control study; Persistent Organic pollutants (POPs); Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs); Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); Pre-eclampsia
Year: 2016 PMID: 27904751 PMCID: PMC5121940 DOI: 10.1186/s40201-016-0256-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Health Sci Eng
Baseline characteristics of case (pre-eclampsia) and control groups
| Variables | Pre-eclampsia | Control |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||
| Age (yrs) | 28.2 ± 6.27 | 26.7 ± 4.69 | 0.14 |
| Gestational age (wks) | 33.6 ± 3.50 | 35.1 ± 3.09 |
|
| Weight gain (kg) | 14.4 ± 5.60 | 13 ± 5.48 | 0.17 |
| Pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m2) | 26.2 ± 4.86 | 22.9 ± 4.17 |
|
| Triglyceride (mg/dl) | 270 ± 101.14 | 263.5 ± 100.31 | 0.74 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 212.7 ± 41.53 | 222.4 ± 48.22 | 0.27 |
| Total Lipids (mg/dl) | 815.2 ± 161.93 | 830.7 ± 174.44 | 0.63 |
| Education | 0.76 | ||
| Master | 1 (2.2) | 0 (0) | |
| Bachelor | 10 (22.2) | 13 (18.6) | |
| Associate | 2 (4.4) | 3 (4.3) | |
| Diploma | 21 (46.7) | 36 (51.4) | |
| Under diploma | 11 (24.4) | 18 (25.7) | |
| Passive smoker | 14 (31.1) | 15 (21.4) | 0.24 |
| Alcohol consumption | 0 (0) | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
| Walking (day/wk) | 3.2 ± 2.84 | 3.5 ± 2.90 | 0.52 |
| Job | 0.42 | ||
| Housewife | 39 (86.7) | 64 (91.4) | |
| Others | 6 (13.3) | 6 (8.6) | |
| Use of supplement | |||
| Routine supplementation | 11 (24.4) | 10 (14.3) | 0.17 |
| Routine plus Calcium | 21 (46.7) | 34 (48.6) | 0.84 |
| Routine plus Multivitamin | 25 (55.6) | 47 (67.1) | 0.21 |
| Routine plus Omega 3 | 4 (8.9) | 11 (15.4) | 0.29 |
Date shown as mean ± SD and numbers with percentages in parenthesis
P-value refers to t-test, chi-square test and Fisher exact test when appropriate. All significant P-value was bolded
Arithmetic means of PCB and PBDE congeners (ng/g lipid) and detection rate of congeners in each group
| Congeners | Pre-eclampsia( | Control ( |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Detection rate | Mean ± SD | Detection rate | Mean ± SD | ||
|
| 33 (73.33) | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 40 (57.14) | 0.01 ± 0.01 |
|
|
| 17 (37.78) | 0.014 ± 0.014 | 18 (25.71) | 0.010 ± 0.014 | 0.37 |
|
| 26 (57.78) | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 29 (41.43) | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.06 |
|
| 18 (40) | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 14 (20) | 0.008 ± 0.007 | 0.05 |
|
| 42 (93.33) | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 51 (72.86) | 0.02 ± 0.01 |
|
|
| 45 (100) | 1.51 ± 1.03 | 70 (100) | 0.81 ± 0.66 |
|
|
| 45 (100) | 1.84 ± 1.25 | 70 (100) | 1.13 ± 1.02 |
|
|
| 44 (97.78) | 0.19 ± 0.17 | 45 (64.29) | 0.05 ± 0.05 |
|
|
| 38 (84.44) | 0.07 ± 0.07 | 24 (34.29) | 0.02 ± 0.03 |
|
|
| 35 (77.78) | 0.05 ± 0.06 | 14 (20) | 0.01 ± 0.01 |
|
|
| 38 (84.44) | 0.10 ± 0.12 | 36 (51.43) | 0.05 ± 0.07 |
|
|
| 39 (86.67) | 0.06 ± 0.07 | 25 (35.71) | 0.02 ± 0.03 |
|
|
| 10 (22.22) | 0.01 ± 0.008 | 8 (11.43) | 0.01 ± 0.004 | 0.71 |
|
| 45 (100) | 1.88 ± 1.52 | 70 (100) | 1.07 ± 0.83 |
|
|
| 6 (13.33) | 0.01 ± 0.007 | 4 (0.54) | 0.01 ± 0.003 | 0.35 |
|
| 24 (53.33) | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 24 (34.29) | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.13 |
|
| 7 (15.56) | 0.01 ± 0.006 | 14 (20) | 0.01 ± 0.007 | 0.86 |
Date shown as mean ± SD and numbers with percentages in parenthesis
*P-value refers to comparison of means by Mann–Whitney U-test between congener’s concentrations. Significant P-value was bolded
Comparison between total PCBs, PBDEs and POPs (ng/g lipid)
| Pre-eclampsia | Control |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | ( | ( | |||
| Mean ± SD | Median | Mean ± SD | Median | ||
| Total PCBs | 3.72 ± 2.37 | 2.86 | 2.07 ± 1.66 | 1.50 |
|
| Total PBDEs | 2.15 ± 1.64 | 1.51 | 1.20 ± 0.90 | 0.95 |
|
| Total POPs | 5.87 ± 3.54 | 5.15 | 3.28 ± 2.23 | 2.70 |
|
Significant P-value was bolded
Maternal serum concentrations of total POPs, total PCBs, and total PBDEs in relation to odds of preeclampsia in four models
| Crude OR (95 % CI) |
| Adjusted OR (95 % CI) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | ||||
| Total POPs | 1.40 (1.18–1.65) |
| 1.54 (1.26–1.87) |
|
| Gestational age | 0.87 (0.77–0.97) |
| 0.74 (0.62–0.89) |
|
| Pre-pregnancy BMI | 1.19 (1.08–1.32) |
| 1.29 (1.14–1.46) |
|
| Weight gain | 1.05 (0.98–1.12) | 0.17 | 1.11 (1.11–1.22) |
|
| Model 2 | ||||
| Total PCBs | 1.54 (1.22–1.95) |
| 1.77 (1.34–2.32) |
|
| Gestational age | 0.74 (0.62–0.88) |
| ||
| Pre-pregnancy BMI | 1.28 (1.13–1.44) |
| ||
| Weight gain | 1.12 (1.02–1.23) |
| ||
| Model 3 | ||||
| Total PBDEs | 1.89 (1.30–2.75) |
| 2.19 (1.39–3.45) |
|
| Gestational age | 0.78 (0.67–0.92) |
| ||
| Pre-pregnancy BMI | 1.25 (1.12–1.40) |
| ||
| Weight gain | 1.09 (0.99–1.19) | 0.07 | ||
| Model 4 | ||||
| Total PCBs | 1.35 (1.05–1.74) |
| 1.77 (1.34–2.32) |
|
| Total PBDEs | 1.49 (0.97–2.30) | 0.07 | 1.52 (0.90–2.58) | 0.12 |
| Gestational age | 074 (0.62–0.88) |
| ||
| Pre-pregnancy BMI | 1.28 (1.13–1.44) |
| ||
| Weight gain | 1.12 (1.02–1.23) |
| ||
Model 1: Total POPs as an independent variable and confounding factors entered to the model
Model 2: Total PCBs as an independent variable and confounding factors entered to the model
Model 3: Total PBDEs as an independent variable and confounding factors entered to the model
Model 4: Total PCBs and total PBDEs as independent variables entered to the model simultaneously with confounding factors
Significant P-value was bolded