Literature DB >> 27903539

Outcome Implication of Aortic Valve Area Normalized to Body Size in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.

Christophe Tribouilloy1, Yohann Bohbot2, Sylvestre Maréchaux2, Nicolas Debry2, Quentin Delpierre2, Marcel Peltier2, Momar Diouf2, Michel Slama2, David Messika-Zeitoun2, Dan Rusinaru2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines define severe aortic stenosis in patients with aortic valve area normalized to body surface area (AVA/BSA) <0.6 cm2/m2; yet, this cutoff has never been validated. Moreover, it is not known whether AVA normalization to other body size indexes allows improved outcome prediction. We aim to test the value of AVA normalized to body size for outcome prediction in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We included 289 patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis, preserved ejection fraction, and AVA<1.3 cm2 at diagnosis. The outcome measure was the occurrence of aortic valve replacement or all-cause death or during follow-up. AVA was normalized to BSA, height, weight, and body mass index. For each normalized index, patients in the lowest tertile were at high risk of events whereas outcome was similar for the other tertiles. High risk of events was observed with AVA/BSA <0.4 cm2/m2 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.42 [2.09-5.60]), AVA/height <0.45 cm2/m (adjusted HR, 3.99 [2.42-6.60]), AVA/weight <0.01 cm2/kg (adjusted HR, 3.37 [2.07-5.49]), and AVA/body mass index <0.029 cm2/kg per meter square (adjusted HR, 3.23 [1.99-5.24]). Mortality risk was high with AVA/height <0.45 cm2/m (adjusted HR, 2.18 [1.28-3.71]), followed by AVA/BSA <0.40 cm2/m2 (adjusted HR, 1.84 [1.09-3.11]), AVA/weight <0.01 cm2/kg (adjusted HR, 1.78 [1.07-2.98]), and AVA/body mass index <0.029 cm2/kg per meter square (adjusted HR, 1.75 [1.04-2.93]). AVA/height showed better predictive performance than AVA/BSA with improved reclassification and better discrimination (net reclassification improvement: 0.33 versus 0.28; integrated discrimination improvement: 0.10 versus 0.08; C statistic: 0.67 versus 0.65), whereas AVA/weight and AVA/body mass index showed lower predictive capacity.
CONCLUSIONS: Among AVA normalization methods, AVA/height <0.45 cm2/m followed by AVA/BSA <0.40 cm2/m2 seem as robust parameters for defining high risk in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. The prognostic value of AVA/height deserves future research.
© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic valve; aortic valve stenosis; asymptomatic conditions; echocardiography; prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27903539     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1941-9651            Impact factor:   7.792


  6 in total

1.  Visualization of Human Aortic Valve Dynamics Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Sub-Millisecond Temporal Resolution.

Authors:  Zheng Zhong; Kaibao Sun; Guangyu Dan; Qingfei Luo; Afshin Farzaneh-Far; Meryem Muge Karaman; Xiaohong Joe Zhou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 5.119

2.  Asymptomatic aortic stenosis: An assessment of patients' and of their general practitioners' knowledge, after an indexed specialized assessment in community practice.

Authors:  Raphaëlle-Ashley Guerbaii; Gabriel Fustier; Pierre-Vladimir Ennezat; Anne Ringle; Camille Trouillet; Pierre Graux; André Vincentelli; Christophe Tribouilloy; Sylvestre Maréchaux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  How Should Very Severe Aortic Stenosis Be Defined in Asymptomatic Individuals?

Authors:  Christophe Tribouilloy; Dan Rusinaru; Yohann Bohbot; Sylvestre Maréchaux; Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 4.  Echocardiographic Imaging Challenges in Obesity: Guideline Recommendations and Limitations of Adjusting to Body Size.

Authors:  Maninder Singh; Anuradha Sethi; Abhishek K Mishra; Navin K Subrayappa; Dwight D Stapleton; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Paradoxical Aortic Stenosis: Simplifying the Diagnostic Process.

Authors:  Vitor Emer Egypto Rosa; João Ricardo Cordeiro Fernandes; Antonio Sergio de Santis Andrade Lopes; Roney Orismar Sampaio; Flávio Tarasoutchi
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Management of elective aortic valve replacement over the long term in the era of COVID-19.

Authors:  Craig Basman; Chad A Kliger; Luigi Pirelli; S Jacob Scheinerman
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.191

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.