| Literature DB >> 27903301 |
Aranzazu Amor1,2, Esperanza Rodriguez3, José M Saugar3, Ana Arroyo4, Beatriz López-Quintana4, Bayeh Abera5, Mulat Yimer5, Endalew Yizengaw5, Derejew Zewdie5, Zimman Ayehubizu5, Tadesse Hailu5, Wondemagegn Mulu5, Adriana Echazú6,7, Alejandro J Krolewieki6,7, Pilar Aparicio8, Zaida Herrador9, Melaku Anegagrie9,10, Agustín Benito9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Soil-transmitted helminthiases (hookworms, Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura) are extremely prevalent in school-aged children living in poor sanitary conditions. Recent epidemiological data suggest that Strongyloides stercoralis is highly unreported. However, accurate data are essential for conducting interventions aimed at introducing control and elimination programmes.Entities:
Keywords: Baermann technique; Ethiopia; Molecular techniques; Neglected; Soil-transmitted helminths; Strongyloides stercoralis
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27903301 PMCID: PMC5131444 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1912-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Location of the schools in the rural area of Bahir Dar. Overall prevalence of parasites (% at the top) and prevalence of Strongyloides stercoralis (% at the bottom) in each school. The map was created using Global Mapper v11.02. Abbreviations: Ac, Achadir; Me, Meshenti; Ge, Gedro; Ze, Zenzelema; Se, Sebatamit; Tb1-4, Tisabay 1-4; Tb 1-8, Tisabay 1-8; Yi, Yiganda)
Overall prevalence of main intestinal parasites and prevalence in the four geographic areas
| Overall ( | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hookworm |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| Pos | % | 95% CI | Pos | % | 95% CI | Pos | % | 95% CI | Pos | % | 95% CI | Pos | % | 95% CI |
| 216 | 54.5 | 49.6–59.4 | 34 | 8.6 | 6.2–11.8 | 12 | 3.0 | 1.7–5.2 | 82 | 20.7 | 17.0–25.0 | 62 | 15.7 | 12.1–19.3 |
| Geographic areas | ||||||||||||||
| North-West ( | Pos | % | 95% CI | North-East ( | Pos | % | 95% CI | |||||||
| Hookworm | 17 | 35.0 | 21.4–48.0 | Hookworm | 71 | 71.7 | 62.2–79.7 | |||||||
|
| 21 | 43.0 | 29.0–56.7 |
| 5 | 5.1 | 2.9–11.3 | |||||||
|
| 10 | 20.0 | 9.1–31.7 |
| 0 | – | – | |||||||
|
| 8 | 16.3 | 6.0–26.7 |
| 27 | 27.3 | 19.5–36.8 | |||||||
|
| 1 | 2.0 | -1.9–6.0 |
| 5 | 5.1 | 2.9–11.3 | |||||||
| South-West ( | Pos | % | 95% CI | South-East ( | Pos | % | 95% CI | |||||||
| Hookworm | 49 | 49.0 | 39.4–58.7 | Hookworm | 79 | 53.4 | 45.4–61.2 | |||||||
|
| 4 | 4.0 | 1.6–9.8 |
| 4 | 2.7 | 1.1–6.7 | |||||||
|
| 2 | 2.0 | 0.6–7.0 |
| 0 | – | – | |||||||
|
| 15 | 15.0 | 9.3–23.3 |
| 32 | 21.6 | 15.8–28.9 | |||||||
|
| 0 | – | – |
| 56 | 37.8 | 30.4–45.9 | |||||||
Fig. 2Prevalence (%) of Strongyloides stercoralis identified by each technique, and by the combination of the three techniques in the 396 samples