Literature DB >> 27903178

Worldwide variance in the potential utilization of Gamma Knife radiosurgery.

Travis Hamilton1, L Dade Lunsford2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The role of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has expanded worldwide during the past 3 decades. The authors sought to evaluate whether experienced users vary in their estimate of its potential use. METHODS Sixty-six current Gamma Knife users from 24 countries responded to an electronic survey. They estimated the potential role of GKRS for benign and malignant tumors, vascular malformations, and functional disorders. These estimates were compared with published disease epidemiological statistics and the 2014 use reports provided by the Leksell Gamma Knife Society (16,750 cases). RESULTS Respondents reported no significant variation in the estimated use in many conditions for which GKRS is performed: meningiomas, vestibular schwannomas, and arteriovenous malformations. Significant variance in the estimated use of GKRS was noted for pituitary tumors, craniopharyngiomas, and cavernous malformations. For many current indications, the authors found significant variance in GKRS users based in the Americas, Europe, and Asia. Experts estimated that GKRS was used in only 8.5% of the 196,000 eligible cases in 2014. CONCLUSIONS Although there was a general worldwide consensus regarding many major indications for GKRS, significant variability was noted for several more controversial roles. This expert opinion survey also suggested that GKRS is significantly underutilized for many current diagnoses, especially in the Americas. Future studies should be conducted to investigate health care barriers to GKRS for many patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AVM = arteriovenous malformation; CBTRUS = Central Brain Tumor Registry of the US; CM = cavernous malformation; DAVF = dural arteriovenous fistula; GK = Gama Knife; GKRS = Gamma Knife radiosurgery; Gamma Knife; TN = trigeminal neuralgia; VS = vestibular schwannoma; epidemiology; intracranial disorders; percentage indication for treatment; percentage utilization; stereotactic radiosurgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27903178     DOI: 10.3171/2016.7.GKS161425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  4 in total

1.  Public interest in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the United States.

Authors:  Timothy D Malouff; Danushka Seneviratne; William C Stross; Stephen Ko; Katherine Tzou; Daniel M Trifiletti; Laura A Vallow
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2020

2.  A Cross-sectional Survey of the North American Skull Base Society: Current Practice Patterns of Vestibular Schwannoma Evaluation and Management in North America.

Authors:  Matthew L Carlson; Jamie J Van Gompel; R Mark Wiet; Nicole M Tombers; Anand K Devaiah; Devyani Lal; Jacques J Morcos; Michael J Link
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-11-03

3.  LINAC stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia -retrospective two-institutional examination of treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Ali Rashid; Bogdan Pintea; Thomas M Kinfe; Gunnar Surber; Klaus Hamm; Jan P Boström
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Evaluation of a New Inverse, Globally Convex Treatment Planning System Algorithm for Gamma Knife Radiation Surgery Within a Prospective Trial: Advantages and Disadvantages in Practical Application.

Authors:  Feline Heinzelmann; Moritz Budde; Irenäus A Adamietz; Kevin Kröninger; Jan P Boström
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-06-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.