Claire Cartwright1, Carrie Barber2, Sue Cowie2, Neil Thompson3. 1. a School of Psychology , University of Auckland , Auckland , New Zealand. 2. b School of Psychology , University of Waikato , Hamilton , New Zealand. 3. c Department of Psychology , University of Canterbury , Christchurch , New Zealand.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: There is evidence that awareness of countertransference (CT) in combination with a conceptualization of CT facilitates its management. This study examines the impact of a trans-theoretical training designed to make the construct of CT accessible to trainee therapists in programs oriented towards cognitive-behavioral therapy. The training aimed to enhance trainees' awareness, understanding, and management of CT. METHOD: Academics at five New Zealand universities introduced the training into their curriculum. Five academics and 54 clinical psychology trainees evaluated it, responding to open-ended questions on the impact of the training on awareness, understanding, and management of CT. They also rated the training's effectiveness. RESULTS: The majority of trainees reported increased awareness and conceptualization of CT. They rated the training as useful for professional practice and reported increased commitment to monitoring CT. Academics also observed trainees' increased awareness and understanding of CT and openness to discussing it. Trainees and academics were less confident in trainees' abilities to manage CT in clinical practice, although trainees reported gains in this area. CONCLUSIONS: The training appeared to enhance awareness and conceptualization of CT, processes that support its management. However, future research into training models needs to examine the impact on CT management in clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: There is evidence that awareness of countertransference (CT) in combination with a conceptualization of CT facilitates its management. This study examines the impact of a trans-theoretical training designed to make the construct of CT accessible to trainee therapists in programs oriented towards cognitive-behavioral therapy. The training aimed to enhance trainees' awareness, understanding, and management of CT. METHOD: Academics at five New Zealand universities introduced the training into their curriculum. Five academics and 54 clinical psychology trainees evaluated it, responding to open-ended questions on the impact of the training on awareness, understanding, and management of CT. They also rated the training's effectiveness. RESULTS: The majority of trainees reported increased awareness and conceptualization of CT. They rated the training as useful for professional practice and reported increased commitment to monitoring CT. Academics also observed trainees' increased awareness and understanding of CT and openness to discussing it. Trainees and academics were less confident in trainees' abilities to manage CT in clinical practice, although trainees reported gains in this area. CONCLUSIONS: The training appeared to enhance awareness and conceptualization of CT, processes that support its management. However, future research into training models needs to examine the impact on CT management in clinical practice.
Entities:
Keywords:
countertransference; countertransference management; countertransference training; therapeutic relationship; training