Literature DB >> 27903115

Aggressive surgery based on an anatomical subclassification of craniopharyngiomas.

Hiroki Morisako1, Takeo Goto1, Hiroyuki Goto1, Christian Aisse Bohoun1, Samantha Tamrakar1, Kenji Ohata1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Craniopharyngiomas remain a particularly formidable challenge in the neurosurgical field. Because these lesions involve the hypothalamus and ophthalmological systems, their resection is associated with either higher rates of mortality and recurrence or a lower rate of radical resection. The authors report the outcomes of aggressive surgeries based on an anatomical subclassification of craniopharyngiomas. METHODS Clinical and ophthalmological examinations, imaging studies, endocrinological studies, neuropsychological function, and surgical complications in all patients who had undergone microsurgical resection for craniopharyngioma at Osaka City University hospital between January 2000 and December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed through the medical records. Radical resections were planned in all of the patients. To help choose the correct surgical approach, craniopharyngiomas were classified based on tumor origin. The 4 possible groups included the intrasellar type, prechiasmatic type, retrochiasmatic type, and intra-third ventricle type. A multistage surgery was planned in some cases. RESULTS Seventy-two cases of craniopharyngioma were resected. Thirty-two patients (44.4%) had undergone previous surgical procedures at other institutions. Thirty-five cases (48.6%) were classified as retrochiasmatic, 19 (26.4%) as prechiasmatic, 12 (16.7%) as intra-third ventricle, and 6 (8.3%) as intrasellar. In 26 cases (36.1%), multistage surgery was required to complete the radical resection. Overall, 41 cases involved an orbitozygomatic approach; 21, a transpetrosal approach; 21, an interhemispheric approach; and 14, a transsphenoidal approach. In 3 cases, other approaches were applied. Gross-total resection was achieved in 43 patients (59.7%), near-total resection in 28 (38.9%), and partial resection in only 1 patient (1.4%). The mean follow-up period after resection was 4.7 years. Tumor recurrence or regrowth occurred in 15 (20.8%) of the 72 patients, with 14 of the 15 cases successfully controlled after additional resections and stereotactic radiosurgery. However, 1 patient died of uncontrollable tumor progression, and 2 patients died of unrelated diseases during the follow-up. Overall, disease in 69 (95.8%) of 72 patients was well controlled at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Aggressive tumor resection is the authors' treatment policy for craniopharyngioma. Using an anatomical subclassification of craniopharyngioma to choose the most appropriate surgical approach is helpful in achieving that goal of aggressive resection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GTR = gross-total resection; KPS = Karnofsky Performance Scale; NTR = near-total resection; PR = partial resection; STR = subtotal resection; VIS = visual impairment score; anatomical subclassification; craniopharyngioma; outcome; surgical management

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27903115     DOI: 10.3171/2016.9.FOCUS16211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  9 in total

1.  Approach selection and outcomes of craniopharyngioma resection: a single-institute study.

Authors:  Cao Lei; Li Chuzhong; Liu Chunhui; Zhao Peng; Bai Jiwei; Wang Xinsheng; Zhang Yazhuo; Gui Songbai
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-08-22       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Endoscopic extended transsphenoidal surgery for newly diagnosed paediatric craniopharyngiomas.

Authors:  Mohsen Javadpour; Michael Amoo; Darach Crimmins; John Caird; Patricia Daly; Jane Pears; Cormac Owens; Michael Capra; Declan Cody
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Outcome After Resection of Craniopharyngiomas and the Important Role of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Their Management.

Authors:  Tomokatsu Hori; Kosaku Amano; Takakazu Kawamata; Motohiro Hayashi; Genichiro Ohhashi; Shinichiro Miyazaki; Masami Ono; Nobuhiro Miki
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2021

4.  Contralateral Minimum Anterior and Posterior Combined Petrosal Approach for Retrochiasmatic Craniopharyngiomas: An Alternative Technique.

Authors:  Sachin Ranganatha Goudihalli; Hiroki Morisako; Wimba Prastarana; Takeo Goto; Hiroki Ohata; Kenji Ohata
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-01-11

5.  Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Subdiaphragmatic Type Craniopharyngiomas.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nishioka; Yuichi Nagata; Noriaki Fukuhara; Mitsuo Yamaguchi-Okada; Shozo Yamada
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Surgical aspects in craniopharyngioma treatment.

Authors:  Shingo Fujio; Tomoko Hanada; Masanori Yonenaga; Yushi Nagano; Mika Habu; Kazunori Arita; Koji Yoshimoto
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2020-10-30

7.  Reinvestigating Tumor-Ventricle Relationship of Craniopharyngiomas With Predominantly Ventricular Involvement: An Endoscopic Endonasal Series Based on Histopathological Assessment.

Authors:  Jun Fan; Yi Liu; Chaohu Wang; Zhanpeng Feng; Jun Pan; Yuping Peng; Junxiang Peng; Yun Bao; Jing Nie; Binghui Qiu; Songtao Qi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Craniopharyngioma and the Third Ventricle: This Inescapable Topographical Relationship.

Authors:  José María Pascual; Ruth Prieto
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Fatal Fungal Aneurysm Rupture Due to Aspergillosis after Craniopharyngioma Removal via Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery: Case Report and Comparison with Seven Reported Patients.

Authors:  Mari Kusumi; Hidehiro Oka; Hidehito Kimura; Hitoshi Yamazaki; Koji Kondo; Toshihiro Kumabe
Journal:  NMC Case Rep J       Date:  2022-07-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.