Literature DB >> 27903015

Neurosurgical Resident Training in Germany.

Martin N Stienen1, Jens Gempt2, Oliver P Gautschi1, Andreas K Demetriades3, David Netuka4, Dominique E Kuhlen5, Karl Schaller1, Florian Ringel6.   

Abstract

Introduction Efficient neurosurgical training is of paramount importance to provide continuing high-quality medical care to patients. In this era of law-enforced working hour restrictions, however, maintaining high-quality training can be a challenge and requires some restructuring. We evaluated the current status of resident training in Germany. Methods An electronic survey was sent to European neurosurgical trainees between June 2014 and March 2015. The responses of German trainees were compared with those of trainees from other European countries. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the effect size of the relationship between a trainee being from Germany and the outcome (e.g., satisfaction, working time). Results Of 532 responses, 95 were from German trainees (17.8%). In a multivariate analysis corrected for baseline group differences, German trainees were 29% as likely as non-German trainees to be satisfied with clinical lectures given at their teaching facility (odds ratio [OR]: 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18-0.49; p < 0.0001). The satisfaction rate with hands-on operating room exposure was 73.9% and equal to the rate in Europe (OR: 0.94; 95% CI, 0.56-1.59; p = 0.834). German trainees were 2.3 times as likely to perform a lumbar spine intervention as the primary surgeon within the first year of training (OR: 2.27; 95% CI, 1.42-3.64; p = 0.001). However, they were less likely to perform a cervical spine procedure within 24 months of training (OR: 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17-0.82; p = 0.014) and less likely to perform a craniotomy within 36 months of training (OR: 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.79; p = 0.003). Only 25.6% of German trainees currently adhere to the weekly limit of 48 hours as requested from the European Working Time Directive 2003/88/EC, and in an international comparison, German trainees were twice as likely to work > 50 hours per week (OR: 2.13; 95% CI, 1.25-3.61; p = 0.005). This working time, however, is less spent in the operating suite (OR: 0.26; 95% CI, 0.11-0.59; p = 0.001) and more doing administrative work (OR: 1.83; 95% CI, 1.13-2.96; p = 0.015). Conclusion Some theoretical and practical aspects of neurosurgical training are superior, but a considerable proportion of relevant aspects are inferior in Germany compared with other European countries. The present analyses provide the opportunity for a critical review of the local conditions in German training facilities. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27903015     DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1594012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg        ISSN: 2193-6315            Impact factor:   1.268


  2 in total

1.  Development and initial evaluation of a novel simulation model for comprehensive brain tumor surgery training.

Authors:  Anne Sophie Grosch; Timo Schröder; Torsten Schröder; Julia Onken; Thomas Picht
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Safety of resident training in the microsurgical resection of intracranial tumors: Data from a prospective registry of complications and outcome.

Authors:  Flavio Vasella; Julia Velz; Marian C Neidert; Stephanie Henzi; Johannes Sarnthein; Niklaus Krayenbühl; Oliver Bozinov; Luca Regli; Martin N Stienen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.