Daniel E Hall1, Shipra Arya2, Kendra K Schmid3, Mark A Carlson4, Pierre Lavedan5, Travis L Bailey6, Georgia Purviance7, Tammy Bockman7, Thomas G Lynch8, Jason M Johanning9. 1. Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania2Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Surgical Service Line, Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia4Division of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 3. Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha. 4. Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha7Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha8Department of Surgery, VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha. 5. Department of Extended Care and Rehabilitation, VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha. 6. Department of Surgery, VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha10Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City. 7. Department of Surgery, VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha. 8. Office of Health Operations and Management, Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC12Department of Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC. 9. Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha8Department of Surgery, VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha.
Abstract
Importance: As the US population ages, the number of operations performed on elderly patients will likely increase. Frailty predicts postoperative mortality and morbidity more than age alone, thus presenting opportunities to identify the highest-risk surgical patients and improve their outcomes. Objective: To examine the effect of the Frailty Screening Initiative (FSI) on mortality and complications by comparing the surgical outcomes of a cohort of surgical patients treated before and after implementation of the FSI. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-site, facility-wide, prospective cohort quality improvement project studied all 9153 patients from a level 1b Veterans Affairs medical center who presented for major, elective, noncardiac surgery from October 1, 2007, to July 1, 2014. Interventions: Assessment of preoperative frailty in all patients scheduled for elective surgery began in July 2011. Frailty was assessed with the Risk Analysis Index (RAI), and the records of all frail patients (RAI score, ≥21) were flagged for administrative review by the chief of surgery (or designee) before the scheduled operation. On the basis of this review, clinicians from surgery, anesthesia, critical care, and palliative care were notified of the patient's frailty and associated surgical risks; if indicated, perioperative plans were modified based on team input. Main Outcomes and Measures: Postoperative mortality at 30, 180, and 365 days. Results: From October 1, 2007, to July 1, 2014, a total of 9153 patients underwent surgery (mean [SD] age, 60.3 [13.5] years; female, 653 [7.1%]; and white, 7096 [79.8%]). Overall 30-day mortality decreased from 1.6% (84 of 5275 patients) to 0.7% (26 of 3878 patients, P < .001) after FSI implementation. Improvement was greatest among frail patients (12.2% [24 of 197 patients] to 3.8% [16 of 424 patients], P < .001), although mortality rates also decreased among the robust patients (1.2% [60 of 5078 patients] to 0.3% [10 of 3454 patients], P < .001). The magnitude of improvement among frail patients increased at 180 (23.9% [47 of 197 patients] to 7.7% [30 of 389 patients], P < .001) and 365 days (34.5% [68 of 197 patients] to 11.7% [36 of 309 patients], P < .001). Multivariable models revealed improved survival after FSI implementation, controlling for age, frailty, and predicted mortality (adjusted odds ratio for 180-day survival, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.98-4.16). Conclusions and Relevance: Implementation of the FSI was associated with reduced mortality, suggesting the feasibility of widespread screening of patients preoperatively to identify frailty and the efficacy of system-level initiatives aimed at improving their surgical outcomes. Additional investigation is required to establish a causal connection.
Importance: As the US population ages, the number of operations performed on elderly patients will likely increase. Frailty predicts postoperative mortality and morbidity more than age alone, thus presenting opportunities to identify the highest-risk surgical patients and improve their outcomes. Objective: To examine the effect of the Frailty Screening Initiative (FSI) on mortality and complications by comparing the surgical outcomes of a cohort of surgical patients treated before and after implementation of the FSI. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-site, facility-wide, prospective cohort quality improvement project studied all 9153 patients from a level 1b Veterans Affairs medical center who presented for major, elective, noncardiac surgery from October 1, 2007, to July 1, 2014. Interventions: Assessment of preoperative frailty in all patients scheduled for elective surgery began in July 2011. Frailty was assessed with the Risk Analysis Index (RAI), and the records of all frail patients (RAI score, ≥21) were flagged for administrative review by the chief of surgery (or designee) before the scheduled operation. On the basis of this review, clinicians from surgery, anesthesia, critical care, and palliative care were notified of the patient's frailty and associated surgical risks; if indicated, perioperative plans were modified based on team input. Main Outcomes and Measures: Postoperative mortality at 30, 180, and 365 days. Results: From October 1, 2007, to July 1, 2014, a total of 9153 patients underwent surgery (mean [SD] age, 60.3 [13.5] years; female, 653 [7.1%]; and white, 7096 [79.8%]). Overall 30-day mortality decreased from 1.6% (84 of 5275 patients) to 0.7% (26 of 3878 patients, P < .001) after FSI implementation. Improvement was greatest among frail patients (12.2% [24 of 197 patients] to 3.8% [16 of 424 patients], P < .001), although mortality rates also decreased among the robust patients (1.2% [60 of 5078 patients] to 0.3% [10 of 3454 patients], P < .001). The magnitude of improvement among frail patients increased at 180 (23.9% [47 of 197 patients] to 7.7% [30 of 389 patients], P < .001) and 365 days (34.5% [68 of 197 patients] to 11.7% [36 of 309 patients], P < .001). Multivariable models revealed improved survival after FSI implementation, controlling for age, frailty, and predicted mortality (adjusted odds ratio for 180-day survival, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.98-4.16). Conclusions and Relevance: Implementation of the FSI was associated with reduced mortality, suggesting the feasibility of widespread screening of patients preoperatively to identify frailty and the efficacy of system-level initiatives aimed at improving their surgical outcomes. Additional investigation is required to establish a causal connection.
Authors: Jennifer G Dwyer; Jason F Reynoso; Georgia A Seevers; Kendra K Schmid; Padmashri Muralidhar; Beau Konigsberg; Thomas G Lynch; Jason M Johanning Journal: Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Date: 2014-09
Authors: Michael J Englesbe; Alisha D Lussiez; Jeffrey F Friedman; June A Sullivan; Stewart C Wang Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Alvin C Kwok; Marcus E Semel; Stuart R Lipsitz; Angela M Bader; Amber E Barnato; Atul A Gawande; Ashish K Jha Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-10-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Shipra Arya; Sung In Kim; Yazan Duwayri; Luke P Brewster; Ravi Veeraswamy; Atef Salam; Thomas F Dodson Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2014-10-12 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Matthew S Johnson; Travis L Bailey; Kendra K Schmid; William M Lydiatt; Jason M Johanning Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Katherine F Ernst; Daniel E Hall; Kendra K Schmid; Georgia Seever; Pierre Lavedan; Thomas G Lynch; Jason Michael Johanning Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Nicholas M Pajewski; Kristin Lenoir; Brian J Wells; Jeff D Williamson; Kathryn E Callahan Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Daniel E Hall; Shipra Arya; Kendra K Schmid; Casey Blaser; Mark A Carlson; Travis L Bailey; Georgia Purviance; Tammy Bockman; Thomas G Lynch; Jason Johanning Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Elizabeth L George; Aditi Kashikar; Kara A Rothenberg; Nicolas B Barreto; Rui Chen; Amber W Trickey; Shipra Arya Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2019-12-13 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Kara A Rothenberg; Elizabeth L George; Amber W Trickey; Nicolas B Barreto; Theodore M Johnson; Daniel E Hall; Jason M Johanning; Shipra Arya Journal: Ann Vasc Surg Date: 2020-01-11 Impact factor: 1.466
Authors: Elizabeth L George; Rui Chen; Amber W Trickey; Benjamin S Brooke; Larry Kraiss; Matthew W Mell; Philip P Goodney; Jason Johanning; Jason Hockenberry; Shipra Arya Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2019-05-27 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Rupen Shah; Jeffrey D Borrebach; Jacob C Hodges; Patrick R Varley; Mary Kay Wisniewski; Myrick C Shinall; Shipra Arya; Jonas Johnson; Joel B Nelson; Ada Youk; Nader N Massarweh; Jason M Johanning; Daniel E Hall Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Katherine M Reitz; Oscar C Marroquin; Mazen S Zenati; Jason Kennedy; Mary Korytkowski; Edith Tzeng; Stephen Koscum; David Newhouse; Ricardo Martinez Garcia; Jennifer Vates; Timothy R Billiar; Brian S Zuckerbraun; Richard L Simmons; Stephen Shapiro; Christopher W Seymour; Derek C Angus; Matthew R Rosengart; Matthew D Neal Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 14.766