Literature DB >> 27902568

Health utilities in people with chronic pain using a population-level survey and linked health care administrative data.

Mary-Ellen Hogan1, Anna Taddio2,3, Joel Katz4, Vibhuti Shah5,6, Murray Krahn7,8,9.   

Abstract

Health utilities are a preference-based measure of health-related quality of life that facilitates comparison of disease burden across conditions. We estimated utilities using a population-based, matched sample of adolescents and adults with and without chronic pain, controlling for comorbidity. Ontarians aged ≥12 years with and without chronic pain were identified from the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) 2000-2001 and 2009-2010 and linked to their provincial health care administrative data. Individuals with chronic pain were matched to those without using age, sex, survey year, and a propensity score for having chronic pain estimated from a rurality index, income quintile, and comorbidity. The Health Utilities Index Mark 3 instrument, included in the Canadian Community Health Survey, was used. Mean utilities were calculated for each group. Utility decrement for chronic pain was also calculated for each matched pair. A total of 65,246 responses were available for analysis. After matching, there were 12,146 matched pairs with and without pain. In the matched cohort, mean age was 54 years (SD 12); 61% were female. The matched cohort with chronic pain had a mean utility of 0.59 (95% confidence interval 0.58-0.59), and the decrement associated with chronic pain was 0.32 (95% confidence interval 0.31-0.32). Utilities in people with chronic pain were lower than, and decrements larger than, those seen with most other chronic diseases including heart disease, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. These data will be useful to inform priorities and future strategies for the prevention and control of chronic pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27902568     DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  6 in total

1.  Guideline for opioid therapy and chronic noncancer pain.

Authors:  Jason W Busse; Samantha Craigie; David N Juurlink; D Norman Buckley; Li Wang; Rachel J Couban; Thomas Agoritsas; Elie A Akl; Alonso Carrasco-Labra; Lynn Cooper; Chris Cull; Bruno R da Costa; Joseph W Frank; Gus Grant; Alfonso Iorio; Navindra Persaud; Sol Stern; Peter Tugwell; Per Olav Vandvik; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Just how much does it cost? A cost study of chronic pain following cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Jason Robert Guertin; M Gabrielle Pagé; Jean-Éric Tarride; Denis Talbot; Judy Watt-Watson; Manon Choinière
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.133

3.  Quebec Serve and Protect Low Back Pain Study: What About Mental Quality of Life?

Authors:  Nabiha Benyamina Douma; Charles Côté; Anaïs Lacasse
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2018-09-06

Review 4.  Chronic postsurgical pain: From risk factor identification to multidisciplinary management at the Toronto General Hospital Transitional Pain Service.

Authors:  Joel Katz; Aliza Z Weinrib; Hance Clarke
Journal:  Can J Pain       Date:  2019-07-30

5.  Perspectives of pain specialists, patients, and family members on long-term opioid use for chronic non-cancer pain: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Rattaphol Seangrung; Thongchai Tempeetikul; Supasit Pannarunothai; Supalak Sakdanuwatwong
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Actual situation and prescribing patterns of opioids by pain physicians in South Korea.

Authors:  Min Jung Kim; Ji Yeon Kim; Yun Hee Lim; Sung Jun Hong; Jae Hun Jeong; Hey Ran Choi; Sun Kyung Park; Jung Eun Kim; Min Ki Lee; Jae Hun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2022-10-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.