Stephen D Herrmann1, Robert G McMurray2, Youngdeok Kim3, Erik A Willis4, Minsoo Kang5, Thomas McCurdy6. 1. Children's Health Research Center, Sanford Research, Sioux Falls, South Dakota. 2. Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 3. Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas. 4. Cardiovascular Research Institute University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas. 5. Department of Health and Human Performance, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee. 6. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the literature on resting energy expenditure (REE) of youth and determine the influence of age, sex, BMI, and body composition on REE. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, BIOSIS Previews, NTIS, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Pascal databases for studies with data on resting metabolic rate, REE, resting oxygen uptake (or VO2 ) in healthy children, youth, or adolescents (age = 1-18 years). Over 200 publications were identified; sixty-one publications met criteria and were included in the meta-analyses, resulting in 142 study population estimates (totaling 5,397 youth) of REE. RESULTS: Pooled mean was 1414 kcal·day-1 with a significant and moderate-to-high between-study heterogeneity [Q(140) = 7912.42, P < 0.001; I2 = 98.97%]. A significantly greater (P < 0.001) pooled mean kcal·day-1 was estimated for studies with male participants (1519 kcal·day-1 ) comparing to studies with female participants (1338 kcal·day-1 ). Age, height, and body mass resulted in the highest R2 of 86.4 for males and 83.9% for females. Fat free mass and body mass index (BMI) did not improve total R2 . CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that using a linear equation including age, height, and body mass to estimate REE based on kcal·day-1 is more accurate than estimates based on body mass kcal·kg-1 ·h-1 . Further, if kcal·kg-1 ·h-1 is used, including a quadratic component for the physical characteristics improves the predictive ability of the equation. Regardless of the metric, separate equations should be used for each sex.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the literature on resting energy expenditure (REE) of youth and determine the influence of age, sex, BMI, and body composition on REE. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, BIOSIS Previews, NTIS, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Pascal databases for studies with data on resting metabolic rate, REE, resting oxygen uptake (or VO2 ) in healthy children, youth, or adolescents (age = 1-18 years). Over 200 publications were identified; sixty-one publications met criteria and were included in the meta-analyses, resulting in 142 study population estimates (totaling 5,397 youth) of REE. RESULTS: Pooled mean was 1414 kcal·day-1 with a significant and moderate-to-high between-study heterogeneity [Q(140) = 7912.42, P < 0.001; I2 = 98.97%]. A significantly greater (P < 0.001) pooled mean kcal·day-1 was estimated for studies with male participants (1519 kcal·day-1 ) comparing to studies with female participants (1338 kcal·day-1 ). Age, height, and body mass resulted in the highest R2 of 86.4 for males and 83.9% for females. Fat free mass and body mass index (BMI) did not improve total R2 . CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that using a linear equation including age, height, and body mass to estimate REE based on kcal·day-1 is more accurate than estimates based on body mass kcal·kg-1 ·h-1 . Further, if kcal·kg-1 ·h-1 is used, including a quadratic component for the physical characteristics improves the predictive ability of the equation. Regardless of the metric, separate equations should be used for each sex.
Authors: David A White; Vincent S Staggs; Veronica Williams; Trent C Edwards; Robin Shook; Valentina Shakhnovich Journal: Child Obes Date: 2019-03-19 Impact factor: 2.992
Authors: Laura P E Watson; Katherine S Carr; Michelle C Venables; Carlo L Acerini; Greta Lyons; Carla Moran; Peter R Murgatroyd; Krishna Chatterjee Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 7.045