Literature DB >> 2790121

A quality-of-life-oriented endpoint for comparing therapies.

R D Gelber1, R S Gelman, A Goldhirsch.   

Abstract

An endpoint, time without symptoms of disease and toxicity of treatment (TWiST), is defined to provide a single measure of length and quality of survival. Time with subjective side effects of treatment and time with unpleasant symptoms of disease are subtracted from overall survival time to calculate TWiST for each patient. The purpose of this paper is to describe the construction of this endpoint, and to elaborate on its interpretation for patient care decision-making. Estimating the distribution of TWiST using actuarial methods is shown by simulation studies to be biased as a result of induced dependency between TWiST and its censoring distribution. Considering the distribution of TWiST accumulated within a specified time from start of therapy, L, allows one to reduce this bias by substituting estimated TWiST for censored values and provides a method to evaluate the "payback" period for early toxic effects. Quantile distance plots provide graphical representations for treatment comparisons. The analysis of Ludwig Trial III evaluating toxic adjuvant therapies versus a no-treatment control group for postmenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer illustrates the methodology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2790121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  25 in total

1.  Indices of therapeutic outcome in pharmacoeconomic evaluation of drug therapy.

Authors:  S F Hurley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Nonparametric Benefit-Risk Assessment Using Marker Process in the Presence of a Terminal Event.

Authors:  Yifei Sun; Chiung-Yu Huang; Mei-Cheng Wang
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  Testing transition probability matrix of a multi-state model with censored data.

Authors:  Prabhanjan Narayanachar Tattar; H Jalikop H Vaman
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  A semi-Markov multistate model for estimation of the mean quality-adjusted survival for non-progressive processes.

Authors:  Gisela Tunes-da-Silva; Antonio C Pedroso-de-Lima; Pranab K Sen
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Some Geometric Methods for Constructing Decision Criteria Based On Two-Dimensional Parameters.

Authors:  Peter F Thall
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.111

6.  Analysis of quality-of-life adjusted failure time data in the presence of competing, possibly informative, censoring mechanisms.

Authors:  Andrea Rotnitzky; Andrea Bergesio; Andres Farall
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 7.  Integration of PKPD relationships into benefit-risk analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Bellanti; Rob C van Wijk; Meindert Danhof; Oscar Della Pasqua
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Benefit-risk Evaluation for Diagnostics: A Framework (BED-FRAME).

Authors:  Scott R Evans; Gene Pennello; Norberto Pantoja-Galicia; Hongyu Jiang; Andrea M Hujer; Kristine M Hujer; Claudia Manca; Carol Hill; Michael R Jacobs; Liang Chen; Robin Patel; Barry N Kreiswirth; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Oncology Modeling for Fun and Profit! Key Steps for Busy Analysts in Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  Jaclyn Beca; Don Husereau; Kelvin K W Chan; Neil Hawkins; Jeffrey S Hoch
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Using Outcomes to Analyze Patients Rather than Patients to Analyze Outcomes: A Step toward Pragmatism in Benefit:risk Evaluation.

Authors:  Scott R Evans; Dean Follmann
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 1.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.