BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic data suggest cholesterol-lowering drugs may prevent the progression of prostate cancer, but not the incidence of the disease. However, the association of combination therapy in cholesterol reduction on prostate or any cancer is unclear. In this study, we compared the effects of the cholesterol lowering drugs simvastatin and ezetimibe alone or in combination on the growth of LAPC-4 prostate cancer in vivo xenografts. METHODS: Proliferation assays were conducted by MTS solution and assessed by Student's t-test. 90 male nude mice were placed on a high-cholesterol Western-diet for 7 days then injected subcutaneously with 1 × 105 LAPC-4 cells. Two weeks post-injection, mice were randomized to control, 11 mg/kg/day simvastatin, 30 mg/kg ezetimibe, or the combination and sacrificed 42 days post-randomization. We used a generalized linear model with the predictor variables of treatment, time, and treatment by time (i.e., interaction term) with tumor volume as the outcome variable. Total serum and tumor cholesterol were measured. Tumoral RNA was extracted and cDNA synthesized from 1 ug of total RNA for quantitative real-time PCR. RESULTS: Simvastatin directly reduced in vitro prostate cell proliferation in a dose-dependent, cell line-specific manner, but ezetimibe had no effect. In vivo, low continuous dosing of ezetimibe, delivered by food, or simvastatin, delivered via an osmotic pump had no effect on tumor growth compared to control mice. In contrast, dual treatment of simvastatin and ezetimibe accelerated tumor growth. Ezetimibe significantly lowered serum cholesterol by 15%, while simvastatin had no effect. Ezetimibe treatment resulted in higher tumor cholesterol. A sixfold induction of low density lipoprotein receptor mRNA was observed in ezetimibe and the combination with simvastatin versus control tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic cholesterol lowering by ezetimibe did not slow tumor growth, nor did the cholesterol independent effects of simvastatin and the combined treatment increased tumor growth. Despite lower serum cholesterol, tumors from ezetimibe treated mice had higher levels of cholesterol. This study suggests that induction of low density lipoprotein receptor is a possible mechanism of resistance that prostate tumors use to counteract the therapeutic effects of lowering serum cholesterol. Prostate 77:446-457, 2017.
BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic data suggest cholesterol-lowering drugs may prevent the progression of prostate cancer, but not the incidence of the disease. However, the association of combination therapy in cholesterol reduction on prostate or any cancer is unclear. In this study, we compared the effects of the cholesterol lowering drugs simvastatin and ezetimibe alone or in combination on the growth of LAPC-4prostate cancer in vivo xenografts. METHODS: Proliferation assays were conducted by MTS solution and assessed by Student's t-test. 90 male nude mice were placed on a high-cholesterol Western-diet for 7 days then injected subcutaneously with 1 × 105 LAPC-4 cells. Two weeks post-injection, mice were randomized to control, 11 mg/kg/day simvastatin, 30 mg/kg ezetimibe, or the combination and sacrificed 42 days post-randomization. We used a generalized linear model with the predictor variables of treatment, time, and treatment by time (i.e., interaction term) with tumor volume as the outcome variable. Total serum and tumorcholesterol were measured. Tumoral RNA was extracted and cDNA synthesized from 1 ug of total RNA for quantitative real-time PCR. RESULTS:Simvastatin directly reduced in vitro prostate cell proliferation in a dose-dependent, cell line-specific manner, but ezetimibe had no effect. In vivo, low continuous dosing of ezetimibe, delivered by food, or simvastatin, delivered via an osmotic pump had no effect on tumor growth compared to control mice. In contrast, dual treatment of simvastatin and ezetimibe accelerated tumor growth. Ezetimibe significantly lowered serum cholesterol by 15%, while simvastatin had no effect. Ezetimibe treatment resulted in higher tumorcholesterol. A sixfold induction of low density lipoprotein receptor mRNA was observed in ezetimibe and the combination with simvastatin versus control tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic cholesterol lowering by ezetimibe did not slow tumor growth, nor did the cholesterol independent effects of simvastatin and the combined treatment increased tumor growth. Despite lower serum cholesterol, tumors from ezetimibe treated mice had higher levels of cholesterol. This study suggests that induction of low density lipoprotein receptor is a possible mechanism of resistance that prostate tumors use to counteract the therapeutic effects of lowering serum cholesterol. Prostate 77:446-457, 2017.
Authors: Wildon R Farwell; Leonard W D'Avolio; Richard E Scranton; Elizabeth V Lawler; J Michael Gaziano Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2011-04-15 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: K A Klein; R E Reiter; J Redula; H Moradi; X L Zhu; A R Brothman; D J Lamb; M Marcelli; A Belldegrun; O N Witte; C L Sawyers Journal: Nat Med Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Emma H Allott; Lauren E Howard; Matthew R Cooperberg; Christopher J Kane; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Christopher L Amling; Stephen J Freedland Journal: BJU Int Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Erik R Nelson; Suzanne E Wardell; Jeff S Jasper; Sunghee Park; Sunil Suchindran; Matthew K Howe; Nicole J Carver; Ruchita V Pillai; Patrick M Sullivan; Varun Sondhi; Michihisa Umetani; Joseph Geradts; Donald P McDonnell Journal: Science Date: 2013-11-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Xi Zheng; Xiao-Xing Cui; Gina E Avila; Mou-Tuan Huang; Yue Liu; Jagruti Patel; Ah Ng Tony Kong; Raphael Paulino; Weichung Joe Shih; Yong Lin; Arnold B Rabson; Bandaru S Reddy; Allan H Conney Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-09-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Richard Peto; Jonathan Emberson; Martin Landray; Colin Baigent; Rory Collins; Robert Clare; Robert Califf Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-09-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christopher P Cannon; Robert P Giugliano; Michael A Blazing; Robert A Harrington; John L Peterson; Christine McCrary Sisk; John Strony; Thomas A Musliner; Carolyn H McCabe; Enrico Veltri; Eugene Braunwald; Robert M Califf Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2008-09-02 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Elahe A Mostaghel; Keith R Solomon; Kristine Pelton; Michael R Freeman; R Bruce Montgomery Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-01-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yanping Wang; Sungyong You; Shengchen Su; Austin Yeon; Eric M Lo; Sungjin Kim; James L Mohler; Michael R Freeman; Hyung L Kim Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-11-02 Impact factor: 13.801