| Literature DB >> 27900007 |
Xianfeng Li1, Hongyan Ai1, Deke Sun1, Tao Wu1, Jian He1, Zhai Xu2, Li Ding3, Ling Wang3.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to investigate the anti-tumoral activity of morelloflavone substances with different structures. We also studied the possible link between morelloflavone structure and its function. Various types of chromatographic techniques were used to isolate and screen morelloflavone substances from the extracts of gambogic tree trunk and the morelloflavone structures were identified by analytical techniques such as high resolution mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetism. Anti-tumoral activities of different compounds were investigated and the link between the antitumor activity and the structure of compound was exaimed. Our results showed that the isolated morelloflavone substances demonstrated a certain level of antitumor activity. The compound no. 1 had the strongest effect to inhibit glioma U87 and C6 cells followed by compound no. 2 while compound no. 5 was the weakest among them. We conducted a preliminary analysis on the structure-function relationship through the structure comparison and we concluded that the antitumor effects of morelloflavone substances with different structures were significantly different from each other. Thus, the glucose chain in C4 position of biflavone structure can enhance the antitumor activity of the compound in glioma cells. Additionally, the formation of intramolecular hydrogen bonds in biflavone compounds may also play a role in enhancing the antitumor activity and inhibition rate.Entities:
Keywords: biflavone; glioma; structure-function relationship
Year: 2016 PMID: 27900007 PMCID: PMC5103953 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.5094
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Figure 1.Chromatographic separation of gambogic extraction solution.
HRMS information of biflavone substances.
| Substances[ | Retention time | Measured molecular mass | Actual molecular mass | Molecular formula | Error m/z (ppm) | Molecular fragment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.8 | 751.1505 | 751.1510 | C36H31O18 | −0.7 | 151.0031, 285.0392, 435.0708, 437.0866, 445.0556 |
| 2 | 18.6 | 735.1564 | 735.1561 | C36H31O17 | +0.4 | 125.0237, 269.0448, 403.0818, 429.0609, 447.0717 |
| 3 | 24.6 | 589.0972 | 589.0982 | C30H22O13 | −1.7 | 125.0237, 151.0028, 285.0393, 435.0713, 463.0660 |
| 4 | 26.6 | 573.1043 | 573.1033 | C30H22O12 | +1.7 | 125.0237, 296.0313, 419.0761, 447.0711 |
| 5 | 32.7 | 557.1084 | 557.1083 | C30H22O11 | +0.1 | 125.2038, 269.0443, 296.0317, 403.0813, 431.0764 |
Corresponding to the structure of number of substances as shown in Fig. 2. HRMS, high resolution mass spectrometry.
Figure 2.Structure information of biflavone substances.
Proliferation inhibition effect of biflavone substances on glioma U87 cell (%, mean ± SD).
| Concentration (µmol/l) | Compound 1 | Compound 2 | Compound 3 | Compound 4 | Compound 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.13±0.11 | 0.14±0.09 | 0.08±0.12 | 0.11±0.10 | 0.09±0.15 |
| 10 | 12.24±0.24 | 14.10±0.55 | 6.75±0.41 | 6.12±0.33 | 2.23±0.54 |
| 20 | 19.78±0.28 | 17.64±0.86 | 8.17±0.96 | 8.43±0.35 | 1.85±0.21 |
| 40 | 25.66±0.68 | 32.73±0.94 | 12.31±0.68 | 11.92±0.68 | 4.31±0.35 |
| 80 | 55.64±0.65[ | 49.82±0.91[ | 21.17±0.84[ | 22.78±0.75[ | 9.87±0.66[ |
As for the comparison on single factor inter-class variance, the same letters (P>0.05), indicate that there is no significant difference; the different letters (P<0.05), indicate that there is a significant difference.
Inhibition effect of biflavone substances on the growth of rat glioma cell C6 xenograft tumors.
| Groups | Dosage (µg/kg) | Weight (g) | Tumor change (g) | Inhibition rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0 | 7.13 | 2.33±1.11 | 0 |
| Compound 1 | 800 | 5.62 | 0.95±0.55 | 66.73±0.12[ |
| Compound 2 | 800 | 6.77 | 1.23±0.62 | 65.21±0.35[ |
| Compound 3 | 800 | 4.89 | 2.28±0.47 | 52.12±0.51[ |
| Compound 4 | 800 | 5.12 | 2.59±0.41 | 53.31±0.28[ |
| Compound 5 | 800 | 6.08 | 4.41±0.53 | 31.84±0.33[ |
Compared with the control, P<0.05.
Compared with compound 1, P<0.05.
Compared with compound 3, P<0.05.