Literature DB >> 27899990

Microarray analysis of differentially-expressed genes and linker genes associated with the molecular mechanism of colorectal cancer.

Xingjie Shen1, Meng Yue1, Fansheng Meng2, Jingyu Zhu1, Xiaoyan Zhu1, Yakun Jiang1.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide and remains the third leading cause of cancer-associated mortality. The present study aimed to fully elucidate the pathogenesis of CRC and identify associated genes in tumor development. Microarray GSE44076, GSE41328 and GSE44861 datasets were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database and integrated with meta-analysis. Differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) were identified from CRC samples compared with adjacent non-cancerous controls using the Limma package in R, followed by functional analysis using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery online tool. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of DEGs and linker genes was constructed using NetBox software and modules were also mined. Functional annotation was performed for modules with a maximum number of nodes. Subsequent to meta-analysis to pool the data, one dataset that included 327 samples involved in 11,081 genes was obtained. A total of 697 DEGs were identified between CRC samples and adjacent non-cancerous controls. In the PPI network, modules 1 and 5 contained the maximum number of nodes. Collagen, type I, α1 (COL1A1), COL1A2 and matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9) in module 1 and UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase (UGDH), aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1 (ALDH1A1), fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4) and monoglyceride lipase (MGLL) in module 5 exhibited a high degree of connectivity. Functional analysis indicated that the genes in module 1 were involved in extracellular matrix (ECM)-associated functions and that the genes in module 5 were involved in metabolism-related functions. Overall, significant DEGs and linker genes, namely COL1A1, COL1A2, MMP9, UGDH, ALDH1A1, FABP4 and MGLL, play a crucial role in the development of CRC via regulating the ECM and cell metabolism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer; linker gene; module; protein-protein interaction

Year:  2016        PMID: 27899990      PMCID: PMC5103929          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.5122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC), also known as colon cancer, is one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide and remains the third leading cause of cancer-associated mortality (1). In 2014, ~65,000 women and 71,830 men were estimated to be diagnosed with CRC (2). Similar to the majority of other complex tumors, CRC has been the subject of multiple studies with regards to its pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy. Much has been elucidated about the molecular mechanism of CRC in recent years. It is widely recognized that chromosomal instability is the most common genetic abnormality to occur in CRC and has been found in almost 85% of all CRC cases (3). Key genes involved in this pathway include Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), deleted in colorectal carcinoma (DCC), SMAD family member 2 (SMAD2) and SMAD4. KRAS is a proto-oncogene that plays a critical role in the transduction of intracellular signals. The activation of KRAS by binding to guanosine triphosphate could regulate downstream mediator mitogen-activated protein kinase, which is involved in cell division (4). Additionally, SMAD2 and SMAD4 play a vital role in the transforming growth factor-β signaling pathway, which in involved in the regulation of cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis (5). DCC has been shown to correlate with metastasis and a poor prognosis in CRC (6). Moreover, chronic inflammation has been shown to increase the incidence of bowel cancer (7). In the process of inflammation, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) is a key molecule highlighted by experiments (8). Previous studies into the downstream effects of COX have illustrated that basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor are activated by COX2 via prostaglandin E2, all of which are involved in the regulation of cell proliferation and angiogenesis contributing to tumor development (9–11). However, the pathogenesis of CRC is complex and multifactorial. The complete elucidation of its etiology remains to be defined. The present study analyzed three microarray datasets, comparing between colon tumor samples and adjacent normal mucosa tissue samples. Differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) were identified and functional annotation was performed for significant genes, followed by protein-protein interaction (PPI) network construction. The study aimed to detect the molecular mechanisms and associated genes in the development of CRC.

Materials and methods

Microarray data

A total of 3 microarray datasets were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), including GSE44076 (12), GSE41328 (13) and GSE44861 (14). Expression data from GSE44076, which included colon tumor samples from 98 patients and adjacent paired normal mucosa tissues from 50 healthy donors, were obtained using platform GPL13667 (Affymetrix Human Genome U219 Arrays). Microarray data from GSE41328, which included 5 colorectal adenocarcinomas samples and 5 matched normal colon tissue, were generated with the [HG-U133_Plus_2] Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array platform. Expression data from GSE44861, which included 56 tumor samples and 55 adjacent non-cancerous tissue samples, were obtained through the [HT_HG-U133A] Affymetrix HT Human Genome U133A Array platform.

Data preprocessing

Prior to analysis, probe identifications in each dataset were converted into standard gene symbols. For genes with more than one probe set in the array, the average value for the probes was obtained as the expression value of the gene. By contrast, the probe set was deleted when mapped to more than one gene. As the genes were different in the 3 datasets, meta-analysis was performed of these studies, pooling the microarray data across different platforms. In the combined process, batch effects are inevitable. To adjust the data for these batch effects, the surrogate variable analysis package (15) was applied, and normalization was performed using the preprocessCore package (16) in R.

Identification of DEGs in CRC

To identify significant DEGs in colon tumor samples compared with adjacent non-cancerous controls, preprocessed data were exported to Limma package in R language (17). An adjusted P-value was estimated using the Benjamini & Hochberg (BH) method (18). Significant DEGs were identified as those with |log 2 FC (fold-change)|>1 and an adjusted P-value of <0.05.

Functional annotation of DEGs in CRC

Testing for functional enrichment of DEGs in CRC was performed using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) online tool (19). Categories analyzed included Gene Ontology (GO) terms (20) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways (21). Data from the GO annotations was used to construct a functional enrichment network, which was visualized by the enrichment map plugin in Cytoscape (22). The BH correction for multiple testing was performed with a cutoff for an adjusted P-value of <0.05.

PPI network construction

NetBox software, which is written in the Java language, is used to store and establishment the Human Interaction Network based on public databases consisting of Reactome (23,24), the Human Protein Reference Database (25), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Cancer Cell Map (26) and the National Cancer Institute-Nature Pathway Interaction Database (27). Linker genes with statistical significance, which are not differentially-expressed in colon tumors, but interact with DEGs, were obtained through mapping DEGs onto the network. Cytoscape software (28) was used to visualize the molecular interaction. Besides the PPI network under the criteria, NetBox also divided the network into modules. The modules with the maximum number of nodes in the PPI network were subjected to GO terms and Swiss-Prot and Protein Information Resource Keywords enrichment analysis with the DAVID online tool.

Results

Preprocessed results and DEGs in CRC

Following meta-analysis of these 3 studies to pool microarray data across the different platforms, one dataset was obtained that included 327 samples and 11,081 genes. The dataset was preprocessed and normalized, followed by further analysis. The normalized results are shown in Fig. 1. A total of 697 genes were selected as DEGs, including 286 upregulated and 411 downregulated genes, between CRC samples and adjacent non-cancerous control.
Figure 1.

Results of normalization. The upper image represents data prior to normalization, the middle image represents the data adjusted for the batch effect and the image below represents data after normalization.

Significant functions and pathways of DEGs

To annotate these DEGs in the tumor samples, DAVID was used for GO function and KEGG pathway analysis, with the threshold of the adjusted P-value at <0.05. Functional enrichment networks of upregulated and downregulated DEGs are shown in Figs. 2 and 3. The results showed that upregulated DEGs were significantly enriched in cell cycle-related functions, including the cell cycle process, the regulation of the mitotic cell cycle and the regulation of cell proliferation. Downregulated DEGs were mainly enriched in homeostasis-related functions, including chemical homeostasis and cellular ion homeostasis.
Figure 2.

Functional enrichment map of upregulated differentially-expressed genes (DEGs). The nodes represent the enriched functions of the upregulated genes. Edge thickness is proportional to the number of overlapped genes between the different functions. The size of the nodes is proportional to the number of DEGs.

Figure 3.

Functional enrichment map of downregulated differentially-expressed genes (DEGs). The nodes represent the enriched functions of the downregulated genes. Edge thickness is proportional to the number of overlapped genes between the different functions. The size of the nodes is proportional to the number of DEGs.

PPI network analysis

Significant DEGs and linker genes were used to construct the PPI network (Figs. 4 and 5). In the PPI network for upregulated DEGs (Fig. 4), there were 2,508 edges and 296 genes, including 140 DEGs and 156 linker genes. The network was divided into 9 modules by NetBox, in which module 1 contained the maximum number of nodes. Additionally, in the PPI network for downregulated DEGs, there were 301 edges and 165 genes, including 113 DEGs and 42 linker genes. The network was divided into 18 modules, in which module 5 contained the maximum number of nodes. In the PPI network, the hub genes were mined with the top-five degrees of connectivity in the different modules (Table I). The upregulated minichromosome maintenance complex component 7 gene in module 0, linker genes collagen, type I, α1 (COL1A1) and COL1A2, and differentially-expressed matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9) in module 1, and linker genes polo-like kinase 1 and exportin 1 in module 2 exhibited a connectivity degree of >20. Downregulated genes UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase (UGDH), aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1 (ALDH1A1), fatty acid binding protein 4, adipocyte (FABP4) and monoglyceride lipase (MGLL) in module 5 exhibited a connectivity degree of >20.
Figure 4.

Protein-protein interaction network of up-regulated genes and linker genes. The coloration of the nodes is representative of the genes in different modules. Circular nodes represent differentially-expressed genes and rhombic nodes represent linker genes.

Figure 5.

Protein-protein interaction network of downregulated genes and linker genes. The coloration of the nodes is representative of the genes in different modules. Circular nodes represent differentially-expressed genes and rhombic nodes represent linker genes.

Table I.

Connectivity degree of hub genes in the top-five modules.

Module no.Hub geneDegree
Upregulated gene modules
  0MCM722
  0TP5321
  0ORC1L21
  0ORC4L20
  0CDC45L20
  1COL1A125
  1COL1A220
  1MMP920
  1FN119
  1ITGB118
  2PLK171
  2XPO168
  2CDC2066
  2BIRC564
  2PAFAH1B163
  4RRM211
  4SLC27A59
  4CYP39A18
  4SQLE7
  4LIPE6
  5BMP77
  5INHBA7
  5BMP46
  5INHBB5
  5BAMBI5
Downregulated gene modules
  5UGDH26
  5ALDH1A122
  5FABP421
  5MGLL21
  5PPAP2A21
  6PLG7
  6MEP1A6
  6MEP1B6
  6C35
  6NPY5
  8SHBG8
  8SPINK73
  8MT1G2
  8MT2A2
  8MT1F1
  9CCRL15
  9VCAN5
  9CCL55
  9CCL215
  9CCL194
  12CALM111
  12CAV15
  12SCP23
  12EDNRB3
  12EDN32
The functional annotation results showed that the DEGs in module 1 were mainly enriched in extracellular region-related functions and extracellular matrix (ECM)-associated functions (Table II). Downregulated DEGs in module 5 were significantly enriched in metabolic process and biosynthetic process-related functions (Table III).
Table II.

Functional annotation of genes in module 1.

CategoryTermCountBonferroni
Annotation cluster 1Enrichment score: 42.348195504843254
  GOTERM_CC_FATGO:0044421~extracellular region part632.07×10−45
  SP_PIR_KEYWORDSSecreted658.47×10−42
  GOTERM_CC_FATGO:0005576~extracellular region712.53×10−35
Annotation Cluster 2Enrichment score: 41.212870504723476
  SP_PIR_KEYWORDSSignal806.46×10−42
  UP_SEQ_FEATURESignal peptide802.31×10−41
  GOTERM_CC_FATGO:0005576~extracellular region712.53×10−35
Annotation cluster 3Enrichment score: 26.15393329757373
  SP_PIR_KEYWORDSExtracellular matrix323.45×10−33
  GOTERM_CC_FATGO:0031012~extracellular matrix358.66×10−28
  GOTERM_CC_FATGO:0005578~proteinaceous extracellular matrix333.76×10−26
  GOTERM_CC_FATGO:0044420~extracellular matrix part151.57×10−11

GO, Gene Ontology; SP_PIR_KEYWORDS, Swiss-Prot and Protein Information Resource Keywords; CC, cellular component.

Table III.

Functional annotation of genes in module 5.

CategoryTermCountBenjamini
Annotation cluster 1Enrichment score: 28.81018243601853
  SP_PIR_KEYWORDSOxidoreductase281.58×10−31
  GOTERM_BP_FATGO:0055114~oxidation reduction282.57×10−25
  GOTERM_BP_FATGO:0008202~steroid metabolic process215.77×10−25
Annotation cluster 2Enrichment score: 17.61044037865203
  GOTERM_BP_FATGO:0008202~steroid metabolic process215.77×10−25
  SP_PIR_KEYWORDSNadp143.94×10−17
  GOTERM_BP_FATGO:0016125~sterol metabolic process122.20×10−13
  GOTERM_BP_FATGO:0008203~cholesterol metabolic process101.82×10−10
Annotation cluster 3Enrichment score: 10.153502326316204
  GOTERM_BP_FATGO:0006694~steroid biosynthetic process155.19×10−20
  GOTERM_BP_FATGO:0016125~sterol metabolic process122.20×10−13
  GOTERM_BP_FATGO:0008610~lipid biosynthetic process156.44×10−12
  SP_PIR_KEYWORDSSteroid biosynthesis81.29×10−11
  GOTERM_BP_FATGO:0016126~sterol biosynthetic process72.68×10−8
  KEGG_PATHWAYhsa00100:steroid biosynthesis71.05×10−8
  SP_PIR_KEYWORDSSterol biosynthesis61.17×10−8
  SP_PIR_KEYWORDSLipid synthesis72.69×10−7
  SP_PIR_KEYWORDSCholesterol biosynthesis32.98×10−3
  GOTERM_BP_FATGO:0006695~cholesterol biosynthetic process34.89×10−2

GO, Gene Ontology; SP_PIR_KEYWORDS, Swiss-Prot and Protein Information Resource Keywords; BP, biological process; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

Discussion

Using a meta-analysis approach to group 3 microarray datasets, including GSE44076, GSE41328 and GSE44861, DEGs were identified in CRC mucosa compared with adjacent normal mucosa samples. The results suggested that there were 697 DEGs, including 286 upregulated genes. Functional annotation results showed that the upregulated DEGs were involved in cell cycle-related functions, in comparison with the downregulated DEGs, which were enriched in homeostasis-associated functions. In the PPI network, the linker genes COL1A1 and COL1A2, and the DEGs MMP9, UGDH, ALDH1A1, FABP4 and MGLL, which exhibited a connectivity degree of >20, participated in the development of CRC. After the upregulated and downregulated networks were divided into multiple modules, modules 1 and 5 with the maximum number of nodes were subjected to functional annotation. In module 1, the linker genes COL1A1 and COL1A2, and the DEG MMP9 exhibited the highest degree of connectivity. COL1A1 and COL1A2, two type I collagen members, are major components of the ECM. Growing evidence has shown that the ECM plays a critical role in promoting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), which is associated with tumor invasion and metastasis (29). Additionally, EMT is indicated to confer tumor cell resistance to apoptosis and to promote the escape of tumor cells from the senescence process (30,31). Moreover, a pioneer study uncovered the fact that EMT has the capacity of endowing tumor cells with cancer stem cell-like characteristics, which could promote tumor development and chemoresistance (32). MMP9 (also known as gelatinase B), a member of the MMP family, has been proven to degrade various components of the ECM, including type I collagen (33). Notably, an elevated level of MMP9 has been found in CRC (34), which is consistent with the present analysis. Numerous studies have shown that MMP9 plays crucial roles in invasion, metastasis, cell proliferation and angiogenesis (35,36). Angiogenesis and cell proliferation are critically important for tumor development and metastatic spreading (37). From the results of the functional annotation in the present study, the three important genes in module 1 were mainly enriched in ECM-related functions and the ECM-receptor interaction pathway. Accordingly, COL1A1, COL1A2 and MMP9 are involved in CRC tumorigenesis and metastasis via regulation of ECM-associated functions. In module 5, UGDH, ALDH1A1, FABP4 and MGLL were downregulated in colorectal tumor samples and were significantly involved in metabolism-related functions. UGDH is the four-electron transfer enzyme and is associated with the biosynthesis of hyaluronan (HA), which participants in tissue organization, development and cell proliferation (38). A previous study showed that elevated levels of HA are directly involved in the progression of various cancers, and UGDH has been proposed as a biomarker for prostate cancer (39). In parallel, ALDH1A1, which belongs to a superfamily of enzymes, has been identified as a crystalline in the lens and cornea (40). Notably, ALDH1A1 also plays a critical role in regulating lipid metabolism and gluconeogenesis (41). In addition, FABP4, known as a new adipokine, is involved in fatty acid trafficking from the cytoplasm to the nucleus and in lipid metabolism (42). Furthermore, FABP4 is considered as a candidate biomarker of lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome (43). It is well known that MGLL is a member of the serine hydrolase superfamily, which hydrolyze intracellular triglyceride and cholesteryl ester into free fatty acid as an important fuel in mammals (44). More recently, MGLL was found to be abnormally expressed in aggressive human cancer, and to promote cell proliferation and tumor growth (45). It is now clear that the conversion of cells from a normal to cancerous state requires metabolic alterations, including changes in lipid metabolism and gluconeogenesis, in order to support tumor growth and survival. As a result, UGDH, ALDH1A1, FABP4 and MGLL play a key role in metabolism-related functions and regulate the tumorigenesis of CRC. Taken together, the present results suggest that COL1A1, COL1A2 and MMP9 in module 1, and UGDH, ALDH1A1, FABP4 and MGLL in module 5 serve as key hub genes in CRC development, where the genes regulate ECM and cell metabolism-associated functions that are important for tumor growth. However, additional experiments will be required to confirm the bioinformatic results.
  42 in total

1.  KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes.

Authors:  M Kanehisa; S Goto
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Regulatory networks defining EMT during cancer initiation and progression.

Authors:  Bram De Craene; Geert Berx
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 3.  Matrix metalloproteinases as novel biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets in human cancer.

Authors:  Roopali Roy; Jiang Yang; Marsha A Moses
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Relationship between genetic alterations and prognosis in sporadic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shih-Ching Chang; Jen-Kou Lin; Shung Haur Yang; Huann-Sheng Wang; Anna Fen-Yau Li; Chin-Wen Chi
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Molecular control of the hyaluronan biosynthesis.

Authors:  Manuela Viola; Davide Vigetti; Anna Genasetti; Manuela Rizzi; Evgenia Karousou; Paola Moretto; Moira Clerici; Barbara Bartolini; Francesco Pallotti; Giancarlo De Luca; Alberto Passi
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.417

6.  Mechanism of fluorescent fatty acid transfer from adipocyte fatty acid binding protein to membranes.

Authors:  M G Wootan; D A Bernlohr; J Storch
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1993-08-24       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  The epithelial mesenchymal transition confers resistance to the apoptotic effects of transforming growth factor Beta in fetal rat hepatocytes.

Authors:  Francisco Valdés; Alberto M Alvarez; Annamaria Locascio; Sonia Vega; Blanca Herrera; Margarita Fernández; Manuel Benito; M Angela Nieto; Isabel Fabregat
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.852

8.  Retinaldehyde dehydrogenase 1 coordinates hepatic gluconeogenesis and lipid metabolism.

Authors:  Florian W Kiefer; Gabriela Orasanu; Shriram Nallamshetty; Jonathan D Brown; Hong Wang; Philip Luger; Nathan R Qi; Charles F Burant; Gregg Duester; Jorge Plutzky
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 4.736

9.  Reactome knowledgebase of human biological pathways and processes.

Authors:  Lisa Matthews; Gopal Gopinath; Marc Gillespie; Michael Caudy; David Croft; Bernard de Bono; Phani Garapati; Jill Hemish; Henning Hermjakob; Bijay Jassal; Alex Kanapin; Suzanna Lewis; Shahana Mahajan; Bruce May; Esther Schmidt; Imre Vastrik; Guanming Wu; Ewan Birney; Lincoln Stein; Peter D'Eustachio
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  PID: the Pathway Interaction Database.

Authors:  Carl F Schaefer; Kira Anthony; Shiva Krupa; Jeffrey Buchoff; Matthew Day; Timo Hannay; Kenneth H Buetow
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  10 in total

1.  Collagen IV-conveyed signals can regulate chemokine production and promote liver metastasis.

Authors:  George Vaniotis; Roni F Rayes; Shu Qi; Simon Milette; Ni Wang; Stephanie Perrino; France Bourdeau; Hanna Nyström; Yi He; Nathalie Lamarche-Vane; Pnina Brodt
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Analysis of long non-coding RNA expression profiles in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Liang Shen; Wei Liu; Jing Cui; Juan Li; Changzhong Li
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Molecular docking and machine learning analysis of Abemaciclib in colon cancer.

Authors:  Jose Liñares-Blanco; Cristian R Munteanu; Alejandro Pazos; Carlos Fernandez-Lozano
Journal:  BMC Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2020-07-08

4.  Tumor microenvironment characterization in triple-negative breast cancer identifies prognostic gene signature.

Authors:  Yan Qin; Jiehua Deng; Lihua Zhang; Jiaxing Yuan; Huawei Yang; Qiuyun Li
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 5.682

5.  Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 2 Family Member (ALDH2) Is a Therapeutic Index for Oxaliplatin Response on Colorectal Cancer Therapy with Dysfunction p53.

Authors:  Wei-Lin Wang; Uyanga Batzorig; Chin-Sheng Hung; Po-Li Wei; Chien-Yu Huang; Yu-Jia Chang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Microarray analyses reveal genes related to progression and prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Mao Qixing; Dong Gaochao; Xia Wenjie; Wang Anpeng; Chen Bing; Ma Weidong; Xu Lin; Jiang Feng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-12

7.  Upregulation of ALDH1B1 promotes tumor progression in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Yan Yu; Yuting He; Qiqing Cai; Songtao Gao; Weitao Yao; Zhiyong Liu; Zhichao Tian; Qicai Han; Weiwei Wang; Ranran Sun; Yonggang Luo; Chao Li
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-20

8.  Identification and Interaction Analysis of Molecular Markers in Colorectal Cancer by Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis.

Authors:  Bin Han; Dan Feng; Xin Yu; Yuanyuan Zhang; Yuanqi Liu; Liming Zhou
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-08-31

9.  Identification of crucial genes and pathways associated with colorectal cancer by bioinformatics analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoqun Liu; Xiangdong Liu; Tiankui Qiao; Wei Chen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  High expression of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yaqin Zhang; Xiaotong Zhao; Lili Deng; Xueting Li; Ganbiao Wang; Yongxing Li; Mingwei Chen
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.754

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.