Literature DB >> 2789994

O6-ethylguanine carcinogenic lesions in DNA: an NMR study of O6etG.C pairing in dodecanucleotide duplexes.

M W Kalnik1, B F Li, P F Swann, D J Patel.   

Abstract

The pairing of O6etG with C located four base pairs in from either end of the self-complementary d(C1-G2-C3-O6etG4-A5-G6-C7-T8-C9-G10-C11-G12) duplex (designated O6etG.C 12-mer) has been investigated from an analysis of proton and phosphorus two-dimensional NMR experiments. The structural consequences of increasing the alkyl group size were elucidated from a comparative study of the pairing of O6meG4 with C9 in a related sequence (designated O6meG.C 12-mer). The NMR parameters for both O6alkG-containing dodecanucleotides are also compared with those of the control sequence containing G4.C9 base pairs (designated G.C 12-mer). The NOE cross-peaks detected in the two-dimensional NOESY spectra of the O6alkG.C 12-mer duplexes in H2O solution establish that the O6etG4/O6meG4 and C9 bases at the lesion site stack into the helix between the flanking C3.G10 and A5.T8 Watson-Crick base pairs. The amino protons of C9 at the O6alkG4-C9 lesion site resonate as an average resonance at 7.78 and 7.63 ppm in the O6etG.C 12-mer and O6meG.C 12-mer duplexes, respectively. The observed NOEs between the amino protons of C9 and the CH3 protons of O6alkG4 establish a syn orientation of the O6-alkyl group with respect to the N1 of alkylated guanine. A wobble alignment of the O6alkG4.C9 base pair stablized by two hydrogen bonds, one between the amino group of C9 and N1 of O6alkG and the other between the amino group of O6alkG and N3 of C9, is tentatively proposed on the basis of the NOEs between the amino protons of C9 at the lesion site and the imino protons of flanking Watson-Crick base pairs. The proton and phosphorus chemical shift differences between the O6etG.C 12-mer and O6meG.C 12-mer duplexes are small compared to the differences between these O6alkG-containing duplexes and the control G.C 12-mer duplex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2789994     DOI: 10.1021/bi00441a009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  8 in total

1.  Replication past O(6)-methylguanine by yeast and human DNA polymerase eta.

Authors:  L Haracska; S Prakash; L Prakash
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Active and alkylated human AGT structures: a novel zinc site, inhibitor and extrahelical base binding.

Authors:  D S Daniels; C D Mol; A S Arvai; S Kanugula; A E Pegg; J A Tainer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-04-03       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Structure of the hydrogen bonding complex of O6-methylguanine with cytosine and thymine during DNA replication.

Authors:  T E Spratt; D E Levy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  B Van Houten
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1990-03

5.  Specificities of human, rat and E. coli O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferases towards the repair of O6-methyl and O6-ethylguanine in DNA.

Authors:  L K Liem; A Lim; B F Li
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-05-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Free energy landscape and transition pathways from Watson-Crick to Hoogsteen base pairing in free duplex DNA.

Authors:  Changwon Yang; Eunae Kim; Youngshang Pak
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  A historical account of Hoogsteen base-pairs in duplex DNA.

Authors:  Evgenia N Nikolova; Huiqing Zhou; Federico L Gottardo; Heidi S Alvey; Isaac J Kimsey; Hashim M Al-Hashimi
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Binding of nucleoid-associated protein fis to DNA is regulated by DNA breathing dynamics.

Authors:  Kristy Nowak-Lovato; Ludmil B Alexandrov; Afsheen Banisadr; Amy L Bauer; Alan R Bishop; Anny Usheva; Fangping Mu; Elizabeth Hong-Geller; Kim Ø Rasmussen; William S Hlavacek; Boian S Alexandrov
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.475

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.