| Literature DB >> 27899925 |
Nicolas Dauby1, Mustapha Chamekh2, Pierrette Melin3, Amy L Slogrove4, Tessa Goetghebuer5.
Abstract
Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a major cause of neonatal sepsis and mortality worldwide. Studies from both developed and developing countries have shown that HIV-exposed but uninfected (HEU) infants are at increased risk of infectious morbidity, as compared to HIV-unexposed uninfected infants (HUU). A higher susceptibility to GBS infections has been reported in HEU infants, particularly late-onset diseases and more severe manifestations of GBS diseases. We review here the possible explanations for increased susceptibility to GBS infection. Maternal GBS colonization during pregnancy is a major risk factor for early-onset GBS invasive disease, but colonization rates are not higher in HIV-infected compared to HIV-uninfected pregnant women, while selective colonization with more virulent strains in HIV-infected women is suggested in some studies. Lower serotype-specific GBS maternal antibody transfer and quantitative and qualitative defects of innate immune responses in HEU infants may play a role in the increased risk of GBS invasive disease. The impact of maternal antiretroviral treatment and its consequences on immune activation in HEU newborns are important to study. Maternal immunization presents a promising intervention to reduce GBS burden in the growing HEU population.Entities:
Keywords: Group B Streptococcus; HIV; HIV exposed uninfected; breast milk; infant; inflammation; newborn; pregnancy
Year: 2016 PMID: 27899925 PMCID: PMC5110531 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00505
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Summary of studies that assessed the risk of GBS invasive disease in HEU infants.
| Reference | HUU control group | Design | Location | Period | GBS disease risk in HIV-exposed compared to HIV-unexposed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epalza et al ( | 20,480 | Yes | Monocentric retrospective | Belgium | 2001–2008 | RR = 19.6 for all GBS infection |
| Higher severity, higher rate of LOD | ||||||
| Cutland et al. ( | 372 | Yes | Monocentric prospective | South Africa | 2004–2008 | Higher IRR = 2.25 (95% CI 1.84–2.76) for invasive disease |
| Higher IRR = 1.69 (95% CI 1.28–2.24) for EOD | ||||||
| Higher IRR = 3.18 (95% CI 2.34–4.36) for LOD | ||||||
| Higher RR for both bacteremia (RR = 1.83; 95% CI 1.40–2.39) and meningitis (RR = 3.05; 95% CI 2.20–4.25) | ||||||
| Dangor et al. ( | 122 | Yes | Multicentre prospective | South Africa | 2012–2014 | Higher IRR = 3.40 (95% CI 2.29–4.85) for invasive disease |
| Similar IRR for EOD | ||||||
| Higher IRR = 4.67 (95% CI 2.24–9.74) for LOD | ||||||
| Higher odds of LOD (OR = 3.5; 95% CI 1.53–8.09) and meningitis (OR = 6.85; 95% CI 2.64–18.31) |
HEU, HIV-exposed uninfected infants; HUU, HIV-unexposed uninfected infants; GBS, Group B Streptococcus; EOD, early-onset disease; LOD, late-onset disease; RR, relative risk; IRR, incidence risk ratio; OR, odds ratio.
Summary of the studies assessing carriage of GBS’ prevalence in HIV-infected pregnant women.
| Reference | Location | Design | Controls/HIV+ | GBS prevalence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIV− (%) | HIV+ (%) | |||||
| Shah et al. ( | USA | Retrospective | 1947/90 | 26.0 | 32.2 | 0.2 |
| Joao et al. ( | Brazil | Cross-sectional | No control group/158 | NA | 31 | NA |
| Gray et al. ( | Malawi | Cross-sectional | 1454/402 | 21.7 | 19.4 | 0.4 |
| Cutland et al. ( | South Africa | Retrospective | 1346/1346 | 23 | 17 | 0.0002 |
| El Beitune et al. ( | Brazil | Prospective | 106/101 | 14.0 | 19.8 | 0.28 |
| Mavenyengwa et al. ( | Zimbabwe | Prospective | 249/88 | 43.1 | 40.0 | NA |
| Matee et al. ( | Tanzania | Cross-sectional | 276/24 | 24.3 | 8.3 | 0.08 |
| Dangor et al. ( | South Africa | Cross-sectional | 81/83 | 27.2 | 32.5 | 0.4 |
A PubMed search was performed using the following MeSH terms: “Streptococcus agalactiae,” “pregnancy” and “HIV.”
Summary of proposed interventions to decrease GBS burden in HEU infants and their impact and limitations.
| Intervention | Impact | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis | Decrease of EOD incidence ( | No impact on LOD incidence ( |
| Maternal immunization with a trivalent vaccine (Ia, Ib, III) | Lower maternal and postnatal colonization rate ( | Only cover specific strains ( |
| Lower incidence of invasive disease ( | Lower response to vaccine in HIV-infected women ( | |
| Breastfeeding promotion | IgG/IgA at the level of GI tract can decrease GBS invasion ( | GBS transmission through breast milk ( |
| Antiretroviral treatment before conception with immune restoration | Decreased neonatal immune activation ( | Higher rate of premature birth associated with some regimens ( |
| Less toxic NRTI or NRTI sparing regimen | Preservation of neutrophils count ( |