| Literature DB >> 27899788 |
Anna Skoczyńska1, Anna Wojakowska2, Barbara Turczyn2, Katarzyna Zatońska3, Maria Wołyniec3, Natalia Rogala4, Andrzej Szuba5, Grażyna Bednarek-Tupikowska4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activity is often decreased in patients with hypothyroidism, whereas less is known about the phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP). We aimed to evaluate simultaneously serum CETP and PLTP activity in patients diagnosed with hypothyroidism. MATERIAL AND METHODS The selection criteria for control group members (without thyroid dysfunction) in this case to case study were levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides similar to those in study group patients (101 patients diagnosed with hypothyroidism). Serum CETP and PLTP activities were measured by homogenous fluorometric assays using synthetic donor particle substrates. RESULTS Serum CETP and PLTP activities in hypothyreotic patients were lower (p<0.001) compared with those in healthy subjects. This lowering was associated with significant changes in HDL-C subclasses: decrease in HDL2- and increase in HDL3 cholesterol levels. Multiple linear regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, smoking habits, and alcohol drinking showed a strong association between hypothyroidism and activity of lipid transfer proteins. A linear inverse relationship between thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and CETP (r=-0.21; p<0.01) and between TSH and PLTP (r=-0.24; p<0.001) was shown. There also was a positive correlation (p<0.001) between CETP and HDL2 cholesterol (r=0.27) and between PLTP and HDL2 cholesterol (r=0.37). A negative correlation between CETP and HDL3 cholesterol (r=-0.22: p<0.01) and between PLTP and HDL3 cholesterol (r=-0.24; p<0.001) has been demonstrated as well. CONCLUSIONS The decreased HDL2 and increased HDL3 cholesterol levels in subjects with hypothyroidism are consequences of decreased activity of lipid transfer proteins. These changes are early symptoms of lipid disturbances in hypothyroidism.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27899788 PMCID: PMC5144931 DOI: 10.12659/msm.898134
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
The characteristic of studied groups. Hypothyreotic patients group to healthy subjects group comparison.
| Hypothyreotic patients | Healthy subjects | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | Mean ±SD | 59.6±10.4 | 57.9±10.1 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | Median (IQR) | 27.1 (23.3; 31.4) | 27.7 (24.8; 31.6) |
| Smokers | n (%) | 29 (28.7) | 22 (21.7) |
| Moderate drinkers | n (%) | 60 (59.4) | 65 (64.3) |
| Type 2 diabetes mellitus | n (%) | 8 (8) | 0 (0) |
| Coronary heart disease | n (%) | 7 (7) | 0 (0) |
| Total C (mmol/L | Mean ±SD | 5.62±1.16 | 5.66±1.16 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | Mean ±SD | 3.33±1.33 | 3.40±1.02 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | Mean ±SD | 1.49±0.36 | 1.58±0.39 |
| Non-HDL-C (mmol/L) | Mean ±SD | 4.13±1.11 | 4.08±1.18 |
| TG (mmol/L) | Mean ±SD | 1.40±0.56 | 1.50±0.81 |
| TSH (μIU/ml) | Mean ±SD | 6.89±8.46 | 2.57±5.14 |
| Median (IQR) | 5.08 (4.32; 6.73) | 1.62 (1.01; 2.17) | |
| Age (yr) | Mean ±SD | 59.1±10.9 | 57.6±10.6 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | Median (IQR) | 26.4 (22.7; 30.6) | 27.2 (24.0; 31.2) |
| Smokers | n (%) | 22 (21.7) | 17 (16.8) |
| Moderate drinkers | n (%) | 48 (47.5) | 49 (48.5) |
| Total C (mmol/L) | Mean ±SD | 5.71±1.16 | 5.57±1.08 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | Mean ±SD | 3.37±1.35 | 3.30±0.93 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | Mean ±SD | 1.53±0.37 | 1.61±0.35 |
| Non-HDL-C (mmol/L) | Mean ±SD | 4.18±1.12 | 3.96±1.10 |
| TG (mmol/L) | Mean ±SD | 1.38± 0.57 | 1.45±0.79 |
| TSH (μIU/ml) | Mean ±SD | 7.21± 9.30 | 2.75± 5.66 |
| Median (IQR) | 5.10 (4.27; 6.74) | 1.62 (0.96; 2.44) | |
| Age (yr) | Mean ±SD | 62.0±7.7 | 59.1±7.8 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | Median (IQR) | 28.5 (23.6; 31.5) | 29.3 (27.7; 33.0) |
| Smokers | n (%) | 7 (6.9) | 5 (4.9) |
| Moderate drinkers | n (%) | 12 (33.3) | 16 (44.4) |
| Total C (mmol/L) | Mean ±SD | 5.21± 1.12 | 5.94±1.38 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | Mean ±SD | 3.10±1.27 | 3.84±1.27 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | Mean ±SD | 1.29± 0.25 | 1.45±0.53 |
| Non-HDL-C (mmol/L) | Mean ±SD | 3.91±1.10 | 4.61±1.41 |
| TG (mmol/L) | Mean ±SD | 1.47±0.55 | 1.72±0.88 |
| TSH (μIU/ml) | Mean ±SD | 5.41±1.19 | 1.76±0.61 |
| Median (IQR) | 4.91 (4.61; 5.96) | 1.68 (1.36; 2.03) | |
Differences statistically significant in comparison to healthy people; p<0.001.
C – cholesterol; LDL – low density lipoprotein; HDL – high density lipoprotein; TG – triglycerides; TSH – thyrotropin; SD – standard deviation; IQR – interquartile range; n – number of people.
Serum lipid transfer protein activity in hypothyreotic and healthy subjects.
| Hypothyreotic patients | Healthy subjects | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| CETP (nmol/ml/h) | Mean ±SD | 35.35±12.00 | 59.70±13.59 |
| PLTP (nmol/ml/h) | Mean ±SD | 37.25±11.10 | 77.24±18.85 |
| HDL2-C (mmol/L) | Mean ±SD | 0.35±0.19 | 0.65±0.33 |
| HDL3-C (mmol/L) | Mean ±SD | 1.06±0.28 | 0.92±0.18 |
| HDL2-C/HDL3-C | Mean ±SD | 0.41±0.15 | 0.73±0.38 |
| CETP (nmol/ml/h) | Mean ±SD | 35.94±12.19 | 60.00±13.36 |
| PLTP (nmol/ml/h) | Mean ±SD | 37.20±11.08 | 78.45± 18.83 |
| HDL2-C (mmol/L) | Mean ±SD | 0.44±0.15 | 0.67±0.30 |
| HDL3-C (mmol/L) | Mean ±SD | 1.08±0.29 | 0.93±0.18 |
| HDL2-C/HDL3-C | Mean ±SD | 0.43±0.13 | 0.75±0.37 |
| CETP (nmol/ml/h) | Mean ±SD | 32.65±10.95 | 58.31±15.12 |
| PLTP (nmol/ml/h) | Mean ±SD | 37.44± 11.47 | 71.67± 18.43 |
| HDL2-C (mmol/L) | Mean ±SD | 0.32±0.09 | 0.56±0.43 |
| HDL3-C (mmol/L) | Mean ±SD | 0.97±0.20 | 0.89±0.19 |
| HDL2-C/HDL3-C | Mean ±SD | 0.34±0.04 | 0.63±0.40 |
statistically significant differences between groups of hypothyreotic and healthy subjects;
p<0.01,
p<0.001.
CETP – cholesteryl ester transfer protein; PLTP – phospholipid transfer protein; HDL2-C – subfraction of high density lipoprotein 2 cholesterol; HDL3-C – subfraction of high density lipoprotein 3 cholesterol; SD – standard deviation; n – number of people.
Figure 1Relationship between cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activities and high-density lipoprotein 2 (HDL2) cholesterol subfraction levels (r=0.2732; p<0.001). CI – indicates confidence interval; r – correlation coefficient.
Figure 2Relationship between phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) activities and high-density lipoprotein 2 (HDL2) cholesterol subfraction levels (r=0.3737; p<0.001). CI – indicates confidence interval; r – correlation coefficient.
Figure 3Relationship between cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activities and high-density lipoprotein 3 (HDL3) cholesterol subfraction levels (r=−0.2172; p<0.01). CI – indicates confidence interval; r – correlation coefficient.
Figure 4Relationship between phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) activities and high-density lipoprotein 3 (HDL3) cholesterol subfraction levels (r=−0.2438; p<0.001). CI – indicates confidence interval; r – correlation coefficient.
Association between presence of hypothyroidism and serum activity of CETP and PLTP or lipids in studied population.
| Effect | β-coeficient (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Hypothyroidism | CETP β-coefficient (95% CI) | |
| 0.62 (0.28 to 0.95) | ||
| PLTP β-coefficient (95% CI) | ||
| 0.81(0.52 to 1.10) | ||
| Total C β-coefficient (95% CI) | ||
| p=0.07 | 0.42 (−0.03 to 0.89) | |
| LDL-C β-coefficient (95% CI) | ||
| p=0.06 | 0.42 (−0.02 to 0.87) | |
| HDL-C β-coefficient (95% CI) | ||
| p=0.13 | 0.34 (−0.11 to 0.80) | |
| HDL2-C β-coefficient (95% CI) | ||
| p=0.06 | 0.40 (−0.02 to 0.83) | |
| HDL3-C β-coefficient (95% CI) | ||
| p=0.65 | 0.10 (−0.33 to 0.53) | |
| Non-HDL-C β-coefficient (95% CI) | ||
| p=0.18 | 0.31 (−0.14 to 0.78) | |
| TG β-coefficient (95% CI) | ||
| p=0.71 | −0.08 (−0.54 to 0.37) |
Multiple linear regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking habits and alcohol drinking. CETP – cholesteryl ester transfer protein; PLTP – phospholipid transfer protein; C – cholesterol; LDL – low density lipoprotein; HDL – high density lipoprotein; HDL2-C – HDL2 cholesterol subfraction; HDL3-C – HDL3 cholesterol subfraction; TG – triglycerides; SD – standard deviation; CI – confidence interval, p-value in bold letter indicates statistical significance.
Figure 5Relationship between thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels and cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activities (r=−0.2072; p<0.01). CI – indicates confidence interval; r – correlation coefficient.
Figure 6Relationship between thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels and phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) activities (r=−0.2357; p<0.001). CI – indicates confidence interval; r – correlation coefficient.
The effect of smoking, alcohol drinking and hypothyroidism and interaction between these factors on their effect on CETP and PLTP activity.
| Effect | F | p |
|---|---|---|
| Tests of significance for CETP | ||
| Smoking | 0.005 | 0.946 |
| Drinking | 0.710 | 0.399 |
| Hypothyroidism | 10.879 | |
| Smoking* drinking | 6.853 | |
| Smoking* hypothyroidism | 0.002 | 0.965 |
| Drinking* hypothyroidism | 1.927 | 0.165 |
| Smoking* drinking* hypothyroidism | 0.213 | 0.644 |
| Tests of significance for PLTP | ||
| Smoking | 0.657 | 0.418 |
| Drinking | 0.041 | 0.839 |
| Hypothyroidism | 30.740 | |
| Smoking* drinking | 0.127 | 0.721 |
| Smoking* hypothyroidism | 0.893 | 0.345 |
| Drinking* hypothyroidism | 0.003 | 0.955 |
| Smoking* drinking* hypothyroidism | 0.390 | 0.532 |
A spreadsheet is a three-way analysis of variance. F – F-test value for the respective effects; p – the probability level of p; CETP – cholesteryl ester transfer protein; PLTP – phospholipid transfer protein.