Literature DB >> 27899742

Acute endovascular treatment delivery to ischemic stroke patients transferred within a telestroke network: a retrospective observational study.

Jessica Barlinn1, Johannes Gerber2, Kristian Barlinn1, Lars-Peder Pallesen1, Timo Siepmann1, Charlotte Zerna1, Claudia Wojciechowski1, Volker Puetz1, Rüdiger von Kummer2, Heinz Reichmann1, Jennifer Linn2, Ulf Bodechtel1.   

Abstract

Background Five randomized controlled trials recently demonstrated efficacy of endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke. Telestroke networks can improve stroke care in rural areas but their role in patients undergoing endovascular treatment is unknown. Aim We compared clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment between anterior circulation stroke patients transferred after teleconsultation and those directly admitted to a tertiary stroke center. Methods Data derived from consecutive patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion who underwent endovascular treatment from January 2010 to December 2014 at our tertiary stroke center. We compared baseline characteristics, onset-to-treatment times, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, in-hospital mortality, reperfusion (modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction 2b/3), and favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin scale ≤ 2) at discharge between patients transferred from spoke hospitals and those directly admitted. Results We studied 151 patients who underwent emergent endovascular treatment for anterior circulation stroke: median age 70 years (interquartile range, 62-75); 55% men; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 15 (12-20). Of these, 48 (31.8%) patients were transferred after teleconsultation and 103 (68.2%) were primarily admitted to our emergency department. Transferred patients were younger (p = 0.020), received more frequently intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (p = 0.008), had prolonged time from stroke onset to endovascular treatment initiation (p < 0.0001) and tended to have lower rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (4.2% vs. 11.7%; p = 0.227) and mortality (8.3% vs. 22.6%; p = 0.041) than directly admitted patients. Similar rates of reperfusion (56.2% vs. 61.2%; p = 0.567) and favorable functional outcome (18.8% vs. 13.7%; p = 0.470) were observed in telestroke patients and those who were directly admitted. Conclusions Telestroke networks may enable delivery of endovascular treatment to selected ischemic stroke patients transferred from remote hospitals that is equitable to patients admitted directly to tertiary hospitals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute stroke therapy; intervention; ischemic stroke; telemedicine

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27899742     DOI: 10.1177/1747493016681018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Stroke        ISSN: 1747-4930            Impact factor:   5.266


  11 in total

Review 1.  Telestroke.

Authors:  Oana M Dumitrascu; Bart M Demaerschalk
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Emergency medical services for acute ischemic stroke: Hub-and-spoke model versus exclusive care in comprehensive centers.

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Symeon Missios; Shannon Coy; Bruce Mayerson; Todd A MacKenzie
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 1.961

3.  Shenzhen stroke emergency map improves access to rt-PA for patients with acute ischaemic stroke.

Authors:  Shisheng Ye; Shiyu Hu; Zhihao Lei; Zhichao Li; Weiping Li; Yi Sui; Lijie Ren
Journal:  Stroke Vasc Neurol       Date:  2019-06-21

4.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of TeleStroke consultations to support the care of patients who had a stroke presenting to regional emergency departments in Western Australia: an economic evaluation case study protocol.

Authors:  Christina Tsou; Suzanne Robinson; James Boyd; Shruthi Kamath; Justin Yeung; Stephanie Waters; Karen Gifford; Andrew Jamieson; Delia Hendrie
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Effectiveness of Telehealth in Rural and Remote Emergency Departments: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christina Tsou; Suzanne Robinson; James Boyd; Andrew Jamieson; Robert Blakeman; Justin Yeung; Josephine McDonnell; Stephanie Waters; Kylie Bosich; Delia Hendrie
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 6.  Importance of the telemedicine network for neurosurgery in Slovenia.

Authors:  Tomaz Velnar; Tilen Zele; Roman Bosnjak
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2019-01-18

7.  Safety of inter-hospital transfer of patients with acute ischemic stroke for evaluation of endovascular thrombectomy.

Authors:  Lars-Peder Pallesen; Simon Winzer; Kristian Barlinn; Alexandra Prakapenia; Timo Siepmann; Cosima Gruener; Johannes Gerber; Kevin Haedrich; Jennifer Linn; Jessica Barlinn; Volker Puetz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Franziska Herpich; Fred Rincon
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 9.296

9.  Team Prenotification Reduces Procedure Times for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to Large Vessel Occlusion Who Are Transferred for Endovascular Therapy.

Authors:  Lars-Peder Pallesen; Simon Winzer; Christian Hartmann; Matthias Kuhn; Johannes C Gerber; Hermann Theilen; Kevin Hädrich; Timo Siepmann; Kristian Barlinn; Jan Rahmig; Jennifer Linn; Jessica Barlinn; Volker Puetz
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  [Telemedicine in stroke-pertinent to stroke care in Germany].

Authors:  J Barlinn; S Winzer; H Worthmann; C Urbanek; K G Häusler; A Günther; H Erdur; M Görtler; L Busetto; C Wojciechowski; J Schmitt; Y Shah; B Büchele; P Sokolowski; T Kraya; S Merkelbach; B Rosengarten; K Stangenberg-Gliss; J Weber; F Schlachetzki; M Abu-Mugheisib; M Petersen; A Schwartz; F Palm; A Jowaed; B Volbers; P Zickler; J Remi; J Bardutzky; J Bösel; H J Audebert; G J Hubert; C Gumbinger
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 1.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.