Literature DB >> 27899734

Taking Advantage of Citation Measures of Scholarly Impact: Hip Hip h Index!

John Ruscio1.   

Abstract

Professional decisions about hiring, tenure, promotion, funding, and honors are informed by assessments of scholarly impact. As a measure of influence, citations are produced by experts but accessible to nonexperts. The h index is the largest number h such that an individual has published at least h works cited at least h times apiece. This is easy to understand and calculate, as or more reliable and valid than alternative citation measures, and highly robust to missing or messy data. Striving for a large h index requires both productivity and influence, which provides healthy incentives for researchers striving for eminence through scientific impact. A number of factors that can influence h are discussed to promote the mindful use of what might otherwise be an ambiguous or misleading measure. The h index adds a transparent, objective component to assessments of scholarly impact, and even academic eminence, that merits at least two cheers.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Keywords:  citations; fame; h index; scholarly impact

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27899734     DOI: 10.1177/1745691616664436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  2 in total

1.  Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences.

Authors:  Michael R Dougherty; Zachary Horne
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.653

2.  Merit and placement in the American faculty hierarchy: Cumulative advantage in archaeology.

Authors:  Michael J Shott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.