Literature DB >> 27899729

"Am I Famous Yet?" Judging Scholarly Merit in Psychological Science: An Introduction.

Robert J Sternberg1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this symposium is to consider new ways of judging merit in academia, especially with respect to research in psychological science. First, I discuss the importance of merit-based evaluation and the purpose of this symposium. Next, I review some previous ideas about judging merit-especially creative merit-and I describe some of the main criteria used by institutions today for judging the quality of research in psychological science. Finally, I suggest a new criterion that institutions and individuals might use and draw some conclusions.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Keywords:  application: policy; assessment; creativity; diagnosis; imagination

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27899729     DOI: 10.1177/1745691616661777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  2 in total

1.  The Relation of Scientific Creativity and Evaluation of Scientific Impact to Scientific Reasoning and General Intelligence.

Authors:  Robert J Sternberg; Rebel J E Todhunter; Aaron Litvak; Karin Sternberg
Journal:  J Intell       Date:  2020-04-15

2.  Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences.

Authors:  Michael R Dougherty; Zachary Horne
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.653

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.