Literature DB >> 27899495

Plantar Shear Stress in Individuals With a History of Diabetic Foot Ulcer: An Emerging Predictive Marker for Foot Ulceration.

Metin Yavuz1, Ali Ersen2, Jessica Hartos3, Brandy Schwarz2, Alan G Garrett4,5, Lawrence A Lavery6, Dane K Wukich7, Linda S Adams2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27899495      PMCID: PMC5250693          DOI: 10.2337/dc16-2204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


× No keyword cloud information.
Plantar shear stress has been held accountable as a causative factor in diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) (1,2). Delbridge et al. (2) recognized shear stress as a major causative factor by stating that it is shear rather than vertical load that is responsible for tissue breakdown that occurs deep to the skin. Historically, research in this area has been hampered by an underestimation of the importance of shear stress and the lack of technology to measure it. Emerging evidence within the past decade has demonstrated the clinical significance of shear to foot ulceration (3–5). We previously revealed that individuals with diabetic neuropathy (DN) experience higher plantar shear compared with control subjects (5). However, to our knowledge, no study has compared peak shear in individuals with a history of DFU to those patients with DN but no history of DFU. We quantified peak plantar shear (PS) in 9 subjects with (DFU) and 16 DN subjects without (DN) previous ulcers using the Cleveland Clinic shear plate (5). Ulcer history was confirmed by the collaborating physicians (A.G.G. and L.A.L). We collected peak pressure (PP) and shear data while barefoot subjects walked across the device at self-selected speeds. Two-sample t tests were used to analyze the group differences. PP was not significantly different between the two groups (DFU 738.6 ± 322.3 kPa, DN 568.0 ± 123.8 kPa, P = 0.2075); however, PS was significantly higher in the DFU group (DFU 135.3 ± 60.6 kPa, DN 86.4 ± 30.3 kPa, P = 0.0465). This study revealed, for the first time, that PS is significantly higher in patients with a history of DFU, representing a risk factor for development of DFU (Fig. 1). Although the study was likely underpowered to detect a significant difference in PP between the two groups, we believe that the higher PP in DFU subjects is clinically meaningful. The difference in PS was sufficient to generate an effect size >0.9, and hence a small sample size was sufficient to capture the statistical significance.
Figure 1

Peak pressure (C) and shear stress (B) profiles of a representative subject who had a previous ulcer under his right hallux (A). Mirror images of stress profiles were provided for easier visualization.

Peak pressure (C) and shear stress (B) profiles of a representative subject who had a previous ulcer under his right hallux (A). Mirror images of stress profiles were provided for easier visualization. Shear stresses act tangentially in anteroposterior and mediolateral directions at the foot-ground interface, transmitting a complex stress–strain pattern to the sublayers of the plantar tissue. These stresses are applied in alternating directions and are abrasive to the plantar surface, particularly during walking. An analogy is a running chainsaw. A running chainsaw applies abrasive shear forces that will easily sever the limb of a tree. When shear force is removed, i.e., when the engine is off, it may be impossible to break the same branch by applying pressure alone. Shear stress may not only lead to abrasion of the skin and plantar tissue but also damage the sublayers of the tissue and contribute to frequent formation of calluses under the diabetic foot, which are well-known risk factors. Emerging evidence suggests that peak shear should be used jointly with pressure to better predict risk for developing a DFU. Future research should investigate the clinical implications of shear in a large longitudinal cohort study. With better biomechanical markers at hand, engineers and clinicians can work together to identify developing ulcers and design novel methods and devices to effectively prevent them.
  5 in total

1.  Tenderizing the foot.

Authors:  Paul W Brand
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.827

2.  American Society of Biomechanics Clinical Biomechanics Award 2012: plantar shear stress distributions in diabetic patients with and without neuropathy.

Authors:  Metin Yavuz
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 3.  The aetiology of diabetic neuropathic ulceration of the foot.

Authors:  L Delbridge; G Ctercteko; C Fowler; T S Reeve; L P Le Quesne
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Peak Plantar Shear and Pressure and Foot Ulcer Locations: A Call to Revisit Ulceration Pathomechanics.

Authors:  Metin Yavuz; Hiral Master; Alan Garrett; Lawrence A Lavery; Linda S Adams
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Association Between Plantar Temperatures and Triaxial Stresses in Individuals With Diabetes.

Authors:  Metin Yavuz; Ryan W Brem; Alan G Glaros; Alan Garrett; Michael Flyzik; Lawrence Lavery; Brian L Davis; Henry Hilario; Linda S Adams
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 19.112

  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  Temperature- and Pressure-Regulating Insoles for Prevention of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Authors:  Metin Yavuz; Ali Ersen; Aakshita Monga; Lawrence A Lavery; Alan G Garrett; Yasser Salem; Gordon B Hirschman; Ryan Myers
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 1.286

2.  Measuring Plantar Tissue Stress in People With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Critical Concept in Diabetic Foot Management.

Authors:  Peter A Lazzarini; Ryan T Crews; Jaap J van Netten; Sicco A Bus; Malindu E Fernando; Paul J Chadwick; Bijan Najafi
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-04-29

Review 3.  Update on management of diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Estelle Everett; Nestoras Mathioudakis
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  An in vivo model for overloading-induced soft tissue injury.

Authors:  Panagiotis E Chatzistergos; Nachiappan Chockalingam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Association between foot thermal responses and shear forces during turning gait in young adults.

Authors:  Angel E Gonzalez; Ana Pineda Gutierrez; Andrew M Kern; Kota Z Takahashi
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 6.  The role of foot pressure measurement in the prediction and prevention of diabetic foot ulceration-A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Katie E Chatwin; Caroline A Abbott; Andrew J M Boulton; Frank L Bowling; Neil D Reeves
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.876

7.  Wound Conforming Matrix Containing Purified Homogenate of Dermal Collagen Promotes Healing of Diabetic Neuropathic Foot Ulcers: Comparative Analysis Versus Standard of Care.

Authors:  Lois A Chandler; Oscar M Alvarez; Peter A Blume; Paul J Kim; Robert S Kirsner; John C Lantis; William A Marston
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 8.  The Role of Foot-Loading Factors and Their Associations with Ulcer Development and Ulcer Healing in People with Diabetes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chantal M Hulshof; Jaap J van Netten; Mirjam Pijnappels; Sicco A Bus
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Monitoring of Dynamic Plantar Foot Temperatures in Diabetes with Personalised 3D-Printed Wearables.

Authors:  Christopher Beach; Glen Cooper; Andrew Weightman; Emma F Hodson-Tole; Neil D Reeves; Alexander J Casson
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.