Literature DB >> 27899368

Diagnostic ability of peripapillary vessel density measurements of optical coherence tomography angiography in primary open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma.

Harsha L Rao1, Sujatha V Kadambi1, Robert N Weinreb2, Narendra K Puttaiah1, Zia S Pradhan1, Dhanaraj A S Rao1, Rajesh S Kumar1, Carroll A B Webers3, Rohit Shetty1.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the diagnostic ability of peripapillary vessel density measurements on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG), and to compare these with peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness measurements.
METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 48 eyes of 33 healthy control subjects, 63 eyes of 39 patients with POAG and 49 eyes of 32 patients with PACG underwent OCTA (RTVue-XR, Optovue, Fremont, California, USA) and RNFL imaging with spectral domain OCT. Diagnostic abilities of vessel density and RNFL parameters were evaluated using area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and sensitivities at fixed specificities.
RESULTS: AUCs of peripapillary vessel density ranged between 0.48 for the temporal sector and 0.88 for the inferotemporal sector in POAG. The same in PACG ranged between 0.57 and 0.86. Sensitivities at 95% specificity ranged from 13% to 70% in POAG, and from 10% to 67% in PACG. AUCs of peripapillary RNFL thickness ranged between 0.51 for the temporal sector and 0.91 for the inferonasal sector in POAG. The same in PACG ranged between 0.61 and 0.87. Sensitivities at 95% specificity ranged from 8% to 68% in POAG, and from 2% to 67% in PACG. AUCs of all peripapillary vessel density measurements were comparable (p>0.05) to the corresponding RNFL thickness measurements in both POAG and PACG.
CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic ability of peripapillary vessel density parameters of OCTA, especially the inferotemporal sector measurement, was good in POAG and PACG. Diagnostic abilities of vessel density measurements were comparable to RNFL measurements in both POAG and PACG. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glaucoma; Imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27899368     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  51 in total

1.  Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Compared With Optical Coherence Tomography Macular Measurements for Detection of Glaucoma.

Authors:  Kelvin H Wan; Alexander K N Lam; Christopher Kai-Shun Leung
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  The effects of graded intraocular pressure challenge on the optic nerve head.

Authors:  Nimesh Patel; Faith McAllister; Laura Pardon; Ronald Harwerth
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.467

3.  The Association Between Macula and ONH Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCT-A) Vessel Densities in Glaucoma, Glaucoma Suspect, and Healthy Eyes.

Authors:  Patricia I C Manalastas; Linda M Zangwill; Fabio B Daga; Mark A Christopher; Luke J Saunders; Takuhei Shoji; Tadamichi Akagi; Rafaella C Penteado; Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Min H Suh; Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Relationship between laser speckle flowgraphy and optical coherence tomography angiography measurements of ocular microcirculation.

Authors:  Naoki Kiyota; Hiroshi Kunikata; Yukihiro Shiga; Kazuko Omodaka; Toru Nakazawa
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Comparison of conjunctival vascularity changes using optical coherence tomography angiography after trabeculectomy and phacotrabeculectomy.

Authors:  Je Hyun Seo; Young Lee; Jong Hoon Shin; Ye An Kim; Keun Heung Park
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Macular Vascular Density Measurements and the Central 10-2 Visual Field in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Rafaella C Penteado; Linda M Zangwill; Fábio B Daga; Luke J Saunders; Patricia I C Manalastas; Takuhei Shoji; Tadamichi Akagi; Mark Christopher; Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Sasan Moghimi; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Effect of Scan Size on Glaucoma Diagnostic Performance Using OCT Angiography En Face Images of the Radial Peripapillary Capillaries.

Authors:  Ryuna Chang; Zhongdi Chu; Bruce Burkemper; Gary C Lee; Ali Fard; Mary K Durbin; Alena Reznik; Benjamin Y Xu; Amir Kashani; Rohit Varma; Ruikang K Wang; Grace M Richter
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Association of Macular and Circumpapillary Microvasculature with Visual Field Sensitivity in Advanced Glaucoma.

Authors:  Elham Ghahari; Christopher Bowd; Linda M Zangwill; James Proudfoot; Kyle A Hasenstab; Huiyuan Hou; Rafaella C Penteado; Patricia Isabel C Manalastas; Sasan Moghimi; Takuhei Shoji; Mark Christopher; Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Reproducibility of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Macular and Optic Nerve Head Vascular Density in Glaucoma and Healthy Eyes.

Authors:  Patricia I C Manalastas; Linda M Zangwill; Luke J Saunders; Kaweh Mansouri; Akram Belghith; Min Hee Suh; Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Rafaella C Penteado; Tadamichi Akagi; Takuhei Shoji; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Reduced Retinal Vessel Density in Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma: A Quantitative Study Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Li Zhu; Yuan Zong; Jian Yu; Chunhui Jiang; Yi He; Yali Jia; David Huang; Xinghuai Sun
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.