| Literature DB >> 27899042 |
Junpei Soeda1, Paul Cordero1, Jiawei Li1, Angelina Mouralidarane1, Esra Asilmaz1, Shuvra Ray1, Vi Nguyen1, Rebeca Carter1, Marco Novelli2, Manlio Vinciguerra1,3,4, Lucilla Poston5, Paul D Taylor5, Jude A Oben1,6.
Abstract
We investigated the regulation of hepatic ER stress in healthy liver and adult or perinatally programmed diet-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Female mice were fed either obesogenic or control diet before mating, during pregnancy and lactation. Post-weaning, offspring from each maternal group were divided into either obesogenic or control diet. At six months, offspring were sacrificed at 4-h intervals over 24 h. Offspring fed obesogenic diets developed NAFLD phenotype, and the combination of maternal and offspring obesogenic diets exacerbated this phenotype. UPR signalling pathways (IREα, PERK, ATF6) and their downstream regulators showed different basal rhythmicity, which was modified in offspring exposed to obesogenic diet and maternal programming. The double obesogenic hit increased liver apoptosis measured by TUNEL staining, active caspase-3 and phospho-JNK and GRP78 promoter methylation levels. This study demonstrates that hepatic UPR is rhythmically activated. The combination of maternal obesity (MO) and obesogenic diets in offspring triggered altered UPR rhythmicity, DNA methylation and cellular apoptosis.Entities:
Keywords: ER stress; NAFLD; Obesity; circadian rhythm; developmental programming
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27899042 PMCID: PMC5399811 DOI: 10.1080/09637486.2016.1261086
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 0963-7486 Impact factor: 3.833
Composition of diets.
| Dietary composition (g/kg) | Control | Obesogenic | Condensed milk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 144 | 230 | 80 |
| Carbohydrates | 540 | 398 | 550 |
| Polysaccharides | 500 | 283 | 0 |
| Simple sugars | 40 | 105 | 550 |
| Lipid | 27 | 226 | 90 |
| Energy (kcal/g) | 3.52 | 4.54 | 3.22 |
| Starch | 449.7 | 283.4 | |
| Cellulose | 43.2 | 61.7 | |
| Hemicellulose | 101.7 | ||
| Sugar | 40.5 | 104.9 | 544 |
| Fatty acids | |||
| Saturated | 5.1 | 76.2 | 59.4 |
| Monounsaturated | 8.8 | 85.2 | 24.3 |
| Polyunsaturated | 8.8 | 39.1 | 3.4 |
| Aminoacids | |||
| Glutamic acid | 31.7 | 45.5 | 16.6 |
| Proline | 12 | 24.8 | 7.7 |
| Leucine | 9.8 | 20.5 | 7.8 |
| Aspartic acid | 6.7 | 15.4 | 6 |
| Serine | 5.6 | 12.9 | 4.3 |
| Valine | 6.9 | 14.5 | 5.3 |
| Lysine | 6.6 | 18.9 | 6.3 |
| Glycine | 11.1 | 4.1 | 1.7 |
| Arginine | 9.1 | 8.1 | 2.9 |
| Others | 44.5 | 65.3 | 20.5 |
| Mineral content | 35 | ||
| Vitamin content | 4.1 | ||
| AIN-93G mineral mix | 1.68 | ||
| AIN-93M mineral mix | 43 | ||
| Vitamin mix | 12 |
Antibodies for western blotting.
| Antibody | Species (clone) | Manufacture | Number |
|---|---|---|---|
| p-PERK | Rabbit | Cell Signaling Technology | 3179S |
| p-EIF2α | Rabbit | Cell Signaling Technology | 3398S |
| p-IREα | Rabbit | Abcam | 14C10 |
| ATF4 | Rabbit | Cell Signaling Technology | 11815 |
| ATF6 | Mouse | AbFrontier | 70B1413.1 |
| GRP78 | Rabbit | Cell Signaling Technology | 3177 |
| CHOP | Mouse | Cell Signaling Technology | 2895 |
| p-JNK | Mouse | Santa Cruz Biotechnology | sc-6254 |
| β-actin | Mouse | Santa Cruz Biotechnology | sc-47778 |
Rt-qPCR primers sequences.
| Gene | Primer sequence |
|---|---|
| sXBP1 | Sense: CTGAGTCCGAATCAGGTGCAG |
| Antisense: GTCCATGGGAAGATGTTCTGG | |
| EDEM1 | Sense: AGTCAAATGTGGATATGCTACGC |
| Antisense: ACAGATATGATATGGCCCTCAGT | |
| ATF4 | Sense: GAGCTTCCTGAACAGCGAAGTG |
| Antisense: TGGCCACCTCCAGATAGTCATC | |
| ERO1L | Sense: TTCTGCCAGGTTAGTGGTTACC |
| Antisense: GTTTGACGGCACAGTCTCTTC | |
| Dnajc3 | Sense: GGCGCTGAGTGTGGAGTAAAT |
| Antisense: GCGTGAAACTGTGATAAGGCG | |
| CHOP | Sense: TATCTCATCCCCAGGAAACG |
| Antisense: GGGCACTGACCACTCTGTTT | |
| Pdia4 | Sense: TCCCATTGCTGTAGCGAAGAT |
| Antisense: GGGGTAGCCACTCACATCAAAT | |
| GRP78 | Sense: GAAAGGATGGTTAATGATGCTGAG |
| Antisense: GTCTTCAATGTCCGCATCCTG | |
| HERP | Sense: GCAGTTGGAGTGTGAGTCG |
| Antisense: TCTGTGGATTCAGCACCCTTT | |
| GAPDH | Sense: TGAACGGGAAGCTCACTGG |
| Antisense: TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA |
Figure 1.Phenotypical, histological and biochemical evidences of NAFLD phenotype in offspring at 6 months: (A) body weight, (B) liver weight, (C) H&E stains of representative liver sections, (D) NAFLD activity score, (E) plasma ALT concentrations and (F) hepatic triglyceride content. n = 5 per experimental group; values shown as mean ± SEM; OffCon-SC: offspring of lean weaned onto standard chow diet; OffCon-OD: offspring of lean weaned onto obesogenic diet; OffOb-SC: offspring of obese weaned onto standard chow diet; OffOb-OD: offspring of obese weaned onto obesogenic diet; one way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test for the main comparisons (OffCon-SC versus OffCon-OD; OffCon-SC versus OffOb-OD; OffCon-OD versus OffOb-OD).
Figure 2.Protein and mRNA concentration of UPR pathways in normal physiological condition (OffCon-SC experimental group; offspring of lean weaned onto standard chow diet) during 24 h. n = 3–4 per experimental time.
Figure 3.Protein and mRNA hepatic concentrations of UPR pathways depending on maternal feeding and offspring post-weaning diet during 24 h. n = 3–4 per experimental group/time point; values shown as mean ± SEM; OffCon-SC: offspring of lean weaned onto standard chow diet; OffCon-OD: offspring of lean weaned onto obesogenic diet; OffOb-OD: offspring of obese weaned onto obesogenic diet; *statistical differences (p < .05) between OffCon-SC and OffCon-Ob. #Statistical differences (p < .05) between OffCon-SC and OffOb-Ob.
Figure 4.Inflammation, apoptosis and autophagy assessment by (A) TUNEL staining assay, (B) active caspase-3 staining and (C) phospho-JNK protein concentration measurement. n = 5 per experimental group; values shown as mean ± SEM; OffCon-SC: offspring of lean weaned onto standard chow diet; OffCon-OD: offspring of lean weaned onto obesogenic diet; OffOb-SC: offspring of obese weaned onto standard chow diet; OffOb-OD: offspring of obese weaned onto obesogenic diet; one way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test for the main comparisons (OffCon-SC versus OffCon-OD; OffCon-SC versus OffOb-OD; OffCon-OD versus OffOb-OD).
Figure 5.Specific DNA methylation measurement in GRP78 promoter region. n = 5 per experimental group; values shown as mean ± SEM; OffCon-SC: offspring of lean weaned onto standard chow diet; OffCon-OD: offspring of lean weaned onto obesogenic diet; OffOb-SC: offspring of obese weaned onto standard chow diet; OffOb-OD: offspring of obese weaned onto obesogenic diet; one way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test for the main comparisons (OffCon-SC versus OffCon-OD; OffCon-SC versus OffOb-OD; OffCon-OD versus OffOb-OD).