Literature DB >> 27898847

Evaluating the removal of pigs from a group and subsequent floor space allowance on the growth performance of heavy-weight finishing pigs.

J R Flohr, M D Tokach, J M DeRouchey, J C Woodworth, R D Goodband, S S Dritz.   

Abstract

A total of 1,092 finishing pigs (initially 36.3 kg) were used in a 117-d study to evaluate the impact of initial floor space allowance and removal strategy on the growth of pigs up to 140 kg BW. There were 4 experimental treatments with 14 pens per treatment. The first treatment provided 0.91 m per pig (15 pigs/pen). The other 3 treatments initially provided 0.65 m per pig (21 pigs/pen) with 3 different removal strategies. The second treatment (2:2:2) removed the 2 heaviest pigs from pens on d 64, 76, and 95 when floor space allowance was predicted to be limiting. Treatment 3 (2:4) removed the 2 heaviest pigs on d 76 and the 4 heaviest pigs on d 105. Treatment 4 (6) removed the heaviest 6 pigs on d 105. All pigs remaining in pens after removals were fed to d 117. Overall (d 0 to 117), pigs initially provided 0.91 m of floor space had increased ( < 0.05) ADG compared to pigs in pens on the 2:4 or 6 removal strategy, but ADG was not different compared with pigs on the 2:2:2 removal strategy. Total BW gain per pen was greater ( < 0.05) for pens initially stocked at 0.65 m compared to pens initially stocked at 0.91 m. Feed usage per pen was less ( < 0.05) for pens initially stocked at 0.91 m compared to pens initially providing 0.65 m of floor space and on removal strategies; however, feed usage per pig was greater ( < 0.05) for pigs initially stocked at 0.91 m compared to pigs initially stocked at 0.65 m and on removal strategies. Feed usage, on a pig or pen basis, was less ( < 0.05) for pigs on the 2:2:2 removal strategy compared to pigs on the 2:4 or the 6 removal strategy. Income over feed and facility cost (IOFFC) was less ( < 0.05) for pigs initially provided 0.91 m compared to pigs initially provided 0.65 m and on removal strategies. Also, IOFFC was less ( < 0.05) for pigs on the 2:2:2 compared to the 2:4 and 6 removal strategies. In conclusion, increasing the floor space allowance or the time points at which pigs are removed from the pen improved the growth of pigs remaining in the pen; however, IOFFC may be reduced because fewer pigs are marketed from each pen (pigs stocked at 0.91 m throughout the study) or from reducing total weight produced (2:2:2 removal strategy).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27898847     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2016-0407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  4 in total

1.  Effect of floor space allowances on growth performance of finishing pigs marketed at 138 kilograms.

Authors:  L J Johnston; D W Rozeboom; R D Goodband; S J Moeller; M C Shannon; S J Schieck
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effects of increasing space allowance by removing a pig or gate adjustment on finishing pig growth performance.

Authors:  Corey B Carpenter; Cheyenne J Holder; Fangzhou Wu; Jason C Woodworth; Joel M DeRouchey; Mike D Tokach; Robert D Goodband; Steve S Dritz
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Effects of increased space allowance on animal welfare, meat and ham quality of heavy pigs slaughtered at 160Kg.

Authors:  Eleonora Nannoni; Giovanna Martelli; Giulia Rubini; Luca Sardi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effect of Phase Feeding, Space Allowance and Mixing on Productive Performance of Grower-Finisher Pigs.

Authors:  Jordi Camp Montoro; Joana Pessoa; David Solà-Oriol; Ramon Muns; Josep Gasa; Edgar Garcia Manzanilla
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.