| Literature DB >> 27897212 |
Yuji Sano1, Naoto Takahata1, Takanori Kagoshima1, Tomo Shibata2, Tetsuji Onoue3, Dapeng Zhao4.
Abstract
Geochemical monitoring of groundwater and soil gas emission pointed out precursor and/or coseismic anomalies of noble gases associated with earthquakes, but there was lack of plausible physico-chemical basis. A laboratory experiment of rock fracturing and noble gas emission was conducted, but there is no quantitative connection between the laboratory results and observation in field. We report here deep groundwater helium anomalies related to the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake, which is an inland crustal earthquake with a strike-slip fault and a shallow hypocenter (10 km depth) close to highly populated areas in Southwest Japan. The observed helium isotope changes, soon after the earthquake, are quantitatively coupled with volumetric strain changes estimated from a fault model, which can be explained by experimental studies of helium degassing during compressional loading of rock samples. Groundwater helium is considered as an effective strain gauge. This suggests the first quantitative linkage between geochemical and seismological observations and may open the possibility to develop a new monitoring system to detect a possible strain change prior to a hazardous earthquake in regions where conventional borehole strain meter is not available.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27897212 PMCID: PMC5126567 DOI: 10.1038/srep37939
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Sampling sites of deep groundwater in the Kumamoto region in Southwest Japan together with epicenters of two foreshocks (M 6.5 and M 6.4) and the main shock (M 7.3) of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake, as well as the Futagawa-Hinagu fault zones.
The base map is modified from the Digital Japan Portal Web Site, Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (http://maps.gsi.go.jp).
Figure 2Relationship between the distance from the fault to the sampling site and (a) 3He/4He ratios of deep groundwater before and after the M 7.3 earthquake, (b) that between the distance and the 3He/4He change, and (c) that between the distance and the radiogenic helium abundance released after the M 7.3 earthquake. Errors are two sigma values.
Figure 3Relationship between the calculated volumetric strain change and abundance of released radiogenic helium at the sampling sites.
Errors are two sigma values. The dotted curve shows a least-squares fitting of equation (1).