| Literature DB >> 27896790 |
Olha Shpotyuk1, Adam Ingram2, Oleh Shpotyuk3,4.
Abstract
Positron annihilation spectroscopy in lifetime measuring mode exploring conventional fast-fast coincidence ORTEC system is employed to characterize free volume structure of commercially available acrylic-type dental restorative composite Charisma® (Heraeus Kulzer GmbH, Germany). The measured lifetime spectra for uncured and light-cured composites are reconstructed from unconstrained x3-term fitting and semi-empirical model exploring x3-x2-coupling decomposition algorithm. The governing channel of positron annihilation in the composites studied is ascribed to mixed positron-Ps trapping, where Ps decaying in the third component is caused entirely by input from free-volume holes in polymer matrix, while the second component is defined by free positron trapping in interfacial free-volume holes between filler nanoparticles and surrounded polymer matrix. Microstructure scenario of the photopolymerization shrinkage includes cross-linking of structural chains in polymer matrix followed by conversion of bound positron-electron (positronium) traps in positron-trapping interfacial free-volume voids in a vicinity of agglomerated filler nanoparticles.Entities:
Keywords: Dental resin composites; Light curing; Positron annihilation; Positronium; Trapping
Year: 2016 PMID: 27896790 PMCID: PMC5125314 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-016-1751-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Fig. 1PAL spectra of non-polymerized Charisma-0 (a) and polymerized Charisma-3 (b) composites reconstructed from unconstrained x3-fitting procedure at the general background of source contribution. The bottom insets show statistical scatter of variance
The best-fit PAL spectra parameters and trapping modes for DRC Charisma® determined within unconstrained x3-decomposion procedure
| Sample | PAL spectra fitting parameters | Positron trapping modes | Ps-trapping modes | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| τ1, ns | τ2, ns | τ3, ns | I2, a.u. | I3, a.u. | τav., ns | τb, ns | κd, ns−1 | τ2-τb, ns | η, a.u. | R3, nm | fv 3, % | |
| 0 | 0.179 | 0.447 | 1.946 | 0.540 | 0.092 | 0.486 | 0.277 | 1.99 | 0.170 | 0.36 | 0.283 | 1.58 |
| 1 | 0.168 | 0.435 | 1.747 | 0.550 | 0.105 | 0.479 | 0.269 | 2.22 | 0.166 | 0.37 | 0.263 | 1.44 |
| 2 | 0.162 | 0.421 | 1.625 | 0.550 | 0.106 | 0.461 | 0.262 | 2.33 | 0.159 | 0.38 | 0.250 | 1.25 |
| 3 | 0.158 | 0.415 | 1.560 | 0.560 | 0.110 | 0.458 | 0.260 | 2.50 | 0.155 | 0.40 | 0.243 | 1.19 |
Fig. 2PAL spectra of non-polymerized Charisma-0 (black open circles) and polymerized Charisma-3 (red full circles) composites in semi-log presentation. The inset shows linearized comparison of annihilation events accumulated in the peak
PAL trapping modes of uncured DRC Charisma-0 in respect to light-cured DRC Charisma-1,2,3 samples calculated within x3-x2-coupling decomposition algorithm [21, 22]
| DRC | First component | Second component | Trapping modes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| τn, ns | In, a.u. | τint, ns | Iint, a.u. | τav, ns | τb, ns | κd, ns−1 | |
| Charisma-1 | 0.319 | 0.026 | 0.547 | 0.058 | 0.477 | 0.449 | 0.90 |
| Charisma-2 | 0.388 | 0.027 | 0.645 | 0.063 | 0.568 | 0.538 | 0.72 |
| Charisma-3 | 0.409 | 0.030 | 0.656 | 0.072 | 0.584 | 0.558 | 0.65 |