Literature DB >> 27896665

Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block by the paralaminar in-plane approach using a microconvex array transducer: methodological utility based on anatomical structures.

Yasuko Taketa1, Taro Fujitani2, Yumi Irisawa2, Satoko Sudo2, Kazushi Takaishi2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the analgesic feasibility of paralaminar in-plane (PL) approach for ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block (USG-TPVB). As the needle trajectory was expected to be closely affected by the distance from the skin to the lamina-transverse process junction (LTPJ), we examined the correlativity between them on computed tomography (CT) or ultrasonography.
METHODS: Thirty-two patients undergoing thoracotomy were recruited. We measured the distances between the skin and LTPJ using preoperative CT (S-L) and procedural ultrasonography (US-L). At the beginning and the end of the surgery, 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine was injected. The level of sensory block and postoperative numerical pain rating scale (NRS) was assessed. Relationships among the measured parameters and the agreement of the needle depth (ND) with S-L and US-L were evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis.
RESULTS: S-L and US-L were strongly correlated with ND (r = 0.72 and r = 0.81, respectively) but not with BMI. The Bland-Altman analysis showed that the mean percent differences between the ND and S-L or ND and US-L were -9.6 and 20.1%, respectively. Catheters were inserted 18.6 mm lateral from the midline on average. Analgesia extended to 3-5 dermatomes in 29 patients, and the median NRS was 2 at 1, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that PL approach provided feasible analgesia for thoracotomy and the ND was significantly correlated with the morphometric values. This technique allowed for inner catheter insertion route targeting longer anteroposterior thoracic paravertebral space length; this may reduce potential risk of pleural puncture for USG-TPVB. Trial registry number This study was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR). (URL: http://umin.ac.jp/ctr/ , ID:UMIN000014821).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microconvex array transducer; Paralaminar in-plane approach; Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27896665     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-016-2289-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  4 in total

1.  Lateral ultrasound-guided paravertebral blockade: an anatomical-based description of a new technique.

Authors:  P Marhofer; S C Kettner; L Hajbok; P Dubsky; E Fleischmann
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Morphometric study of the lumbosacral spine and some of its related angles in Lebanese adult females.

Authors:  El Sayed S Atta-Alla; Ibtissam M Saab; Mohamed El Shishtawy; Khodor Haidar Hassan
Journal:  Ital J Anat Embryol       Date:  2014

3.  Computerized tomographic anatomic relationships of the thoracic paravertebral space.

Authors:  Chong Oon Tan; Christelle Botha; Laurence Weinberg; David A Story; Larry McNicol
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 4.  A comparison of the analgesia efficacy and side effects of paravertebral compared with epidural blockade for thoracotomy: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xibing Ding; Shuqing Jin; Xiaoyin Niu; Hao Ren; Shukun Fu; Quan Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Complex issues in new ultrasound-guided nerve blocks: how to name, where to inject, and how to publish.

Authors:  Masanori Yamauchi; Yutaka Sato
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Ultrasound-Guided Extraforaminal Thoracic Nerve Root Block Through the Midpoint of the Inferior Articular Process and the Parietal Pleura: A Clinical Application of Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block.

Authors:  Junzhen Wu; Dongping Du; Shaofeng Pu; Yiyang Wu; Qingjian Han; Jie Chen; Yongming Xu; Yingying Lv; Chen Li; Jing Lu
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 3.133

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.