Literature DB >> 27896601

How are Editors Selected, Recruited and Approved?

Jaime A Teixeira da Silva1, Aceil Al-Khatib2.   

Abstract

The editors of scholarly journals have a duty to uphold and promote the highest standards of ethical conduct of research. They also have a responsibility to maintain the integrity of the literature, and to promote transparency and honesty in reporting research findings. In the process of screening manuscripts they receive for possible publication, editors have the obligation to report infractions to the institutions of offending authors, and request an investigation. Since editors can reject a paper on ethical grounds, they can be considered to be the guardians of ethics who should express high ethical standards in conducting and publishing their own research. An examination of several publishers' websites reveals no such requirement or clear selection criteria for journal editors. Therefore, we aim to discuss the factors that publishers, in a broad sense, should consider when selecting editors for scholarly journals and believe that such criteria should be made public to ensure accountability. This would restore some of the eroding public trust in disseminated research, fortify confidence in the composition and qualification of members of an editorial board, and help to protect the reputations of publishers and editors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accountability; Criteria; Post-publication peer review; Responsibility; Transparency

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27896601     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9821-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  6 in total

Review 1.  Medical journal editors lacked familiarity with scientific publication issues despite training and regular exposure.

Authors:  Victoria S S Wong; Michael L Callaham
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey.

Authors:  E Wager; S Fiack; C Graf; A Robinson; I Rowlands
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Editorial misconduct.

Authors:  Richard Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-06-07

4.  Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Susan A Elmore
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  What Rights Do Authors Have?

Authors:  Aceil Al-Khatib; Jaime A Teixeira da Silva
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 6.  Why do we need international standards on responsible research publication for authors and editors?

Authors:  Elizabeth Wager; Sabine Kleinert
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.413

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections.

Authors:  Jaime A Teixeira da Silva; Aceil Al-Khatib; Vedran Katavić; Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?

Authors:  Aceil Al-Khatib; Jaime A Teixeira da Silva
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  It may be easier to publish than correct or retract faulty biomedical literature.

Authors:  Jaime A Teixeira da Silva
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 1.351

4.  The role of scientific journal editors during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  J Matias-Guiu
Journal:  Neurologia (Engl Ed)       Date:  2020-05

5.  Editors Should Declare Conflicts of Interest.

Authors:  Jaime A Teixeira da Silva; Judit Dobránszki; Radha Holla Bhar; Charles T Mehlman
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 1.352

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.