| Literature DB >> 27895720 |
Maria Fernanda Gontijo Sepulveda Fusaro1, Jovita Lane Soares Santos Zanini2, Ivani Novato Silva1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increased carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis, is an independent predictor of future cardiovascular events, and has been reported in children with various chronic diseases, including type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1).Entities:
Keywords: Atherosclerosis; Carotid intima-media thickness; Diabetes Mellitus; Risk Factors; Ultrasonography
Year: 2016 PMID: 27895720 PMCID: PMC5106830 DOI: 10.1186/s13098-016-0190-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr ISSN: 1758-5996 Impact factor: 3.320
Clinical and Biochemical (mean ± SD) characteristics of DM1 adolescents and healthy controls
| Characteristics | Adolescent population | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 57 DM1 patients | 61 healthy controls | ||
| Age (years) | 14.5 ± 2.9 | 14.3 ± 2.6 | 1.0 |
| Gender | F 38 M 19 | F 30 M 23 | 0.374 |
| Puberty (Tanner)a | |||
| Initial | 29 | 31 | 1.0 |
| Advanced | 28 | 30 | |
| Z BMI | −0.40 ± 0.9 (20.0 ± 2.4) | −0.40 ± 0.9 (20.8 ± 2.2) | 1.0 |
| SBP | 103.1 ± 10.2 | 110.1 ± 8.5 | <0.001 |
| DBP | 66 ± 10.4 | 72 ± 7.2 | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 88.5 ± 46.5 | 72 ± 26.8 | 0.022 |
| Total-C (mg/dL) | 178.3 ± 31.9 | 148.5 ± 19.1 | <0.001 |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 97.0 ± 24.3 | 84.7 ± 17.8 | 0.002 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 61.4 ± 17.3 | 49.6 ± 8.4 | <0.001 |
| HbA1c | 9.7 ± 2.0 | NA | |
| Duration of diabetes (m) | 109.0 ± 35.6 | NA | |
SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure (mm/Hg), NA not applicable
a Tanner 2/3 initial puberty; Tanner 4/5 advanced puberty
Increased RCIMT and LCIMT values in 57 DM1 adolescents compared with 61 healthy controls
| Characteristics | n | Mean ± SD | Min | 1Q | Median | 3Q | Max | p valuea |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right side | ||||||||
| Patients | 57 | 0.53 ± 0.05 | 0.45 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.58 | 0.66 |
|
| Control group | 61 | 0.51 ± 0.05 | 0.41 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.53 | |
| Left side | ||||||||
| Patients | 57 | 0.55 ± 0.04 | 0.47 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.64 | < |
| Control group | 61 | 0.51 ± 0.04 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.61 | |
RCIMT right carotid intima media thickness, LCIMT left carotid intima media thickness
aStudent t test
Association between the risk variables and RCIMT in 57 DM1 adolescents in the multivariate analysis
| Variables | RCIMT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | IV | |
| Categorical | ||||
| Total C | ||||
| Borderline | −0.02 (−0.05 to 0.01) | – | – | – |
| Normal | − | – | – | – |
| LDL-C | ||||
| Borderline | – | – | – | – |
| Normal | – | – | – | – |
| SBP percentile | – | – | – |
|
| Quantitative | ||||
| DM1 duration |
|
|
|
|
| Total C |
|
|
|
|
| LDL-C | – | – |
| – |
OR (confidence interval)
RCIMT right carotid intima media thickness
– not present in the model
Association between the risk variables and LCIMT in 57 DM1 adolescents in the multivariate analysis
| Variables | LCIMT | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | IV | V | |
| Categorical | |||||
| Total C | |||||
| Borderline | −0.02 (−0.05 to 0.003) | – | – | – | – |
| Normal | − | – | – | – | – |
| LDL-C | |||||
| Borderline | – | – | −0.02 (−0.06 to 0.02) | – | – |
| Normal | – | – | − | – | – |
| SBP percentile | – | – | – |
| |
| Quantitative | |||||
| DM1 duration |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total C | – |
| – | – | – |
| LDL-C | – | – | – |
| – |
OR (confidence interval)
LCIMT left carotid intima media thickness
– not present in the model