| Literature DB >> 27895628 |
Megan M Morris1, John M Haggerty1, Bhavya N Papudeshi2, Alejandro A Vega1, Matthew S Edwards1, Elizabeth A Dinsdale1.
Abstract
Marine microbes mediate key ecological processes in kelp forest ecosystems and interact with macroalgae. Pelagic and biofilm-associated microbes interact with macroalgal propagules at multiple stages of recruitment, yet these interactions have not been described for Macrocystis pyrifera. Here we investigate the influence of microbes from coastal environments on recruitment of giant kelp, M. pyrifera. Through repeated laboratory experiments, we tested the effects of altered pelagic microbial abundance on the settlement and development of the microscopic propagules of M. pyrifera during recruitment. M. pyrifera zoospores were reared in laboratory microcosms exposed to environmental microbial communities from seawater during the complete haploid stages of the kelp recruitment cycle, including zoospore release, followed by zoospore settlement, to gametophyte germination and development. We altered the microbial abundance states differentially in three independent experiments with repeated trials, where microbes were (a) present or absent in seawater, (b) altered in community composition, and (c) altered in abundance. Within the third experiment, we also tested the effect of nearshore versus offshore microbial communities on the macroalgal propagules. Distinct pelagic microbial communities were collected from two southern California temperate environments reflecting contrasting intensity of human influence, the nearshore Point Loma kelp forest and the offshore Santa Catalina Island kelp forest. The Point Loma kelp forest is a high impacted coastal region adjacent to the populous San Diego Bay; whereas the kelp forest at Catalina Island is a low impacted region of the Channel Islands, 40 km offshore the southern California coast, and is adjacent to a marine protected area. Kelp gametophytes reared with nearshore Point Loma microbes showed lower survival, growth, and deteriorated morphology compared to gametophytes with the offshore Catalina Island microbial community, and these effects were magnified under high microbial abundances. Reducing abundance of Point Loma microbes restored M. pyrifera propagule success. Yet an intermediate microbial abundance was optimal for kelp propagules reared with Catalina Island microbes, suggesting that microbes also have a beneficial influence on kelp. Our study shows that pelagic microbes from nearshore and offshore environments are differentially influencing kelp propagule success, which has significant implications for kelp recruitment and kelp forest ecosystem health.Entities:
Keywords: Macrocystis pyrifera; gametophytes; kelp recruitment; macroalgae–microbial interaction; microbial ecology
Year: 2016 PMID: 27895628 PMCID: PMC5107569 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01800
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Water quality measurements logged with a MANTA-2 multiprobe for the Point Loma and Catalina Island, California kelp forests.
| Depth (m) | Temp (°C) | Salinity (ppt) | pH | Chlorophyll- | Dissolved oxygen (% Sat) | Dissolved oxygen (mg l-1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Point Loma | 0.607 ± 0.047 | 16.807 ± 0.039 | 40.308 ± 0.039 | 8.073 ± 0.055 | 1.347 ± 0.015 | 118.067 ± 2.034 | 9.367 ± 0.153 |
| Catalina Island | 0.230 ± 0.006 | 16.593 ± 0.009 | 40.205 ± 0.010 | 8.847 ± 0.009 | 1.253 ± 0.018 | 115.000 ± 0.808 | 9.177 ± 0.064 |
Multiple statistical comparisons of the gametophyte abundance and size (mm) in experiments investigating the effects of altered microbial abundance and community composition on Macrocystis pyrifera recruitment.
| Gametophyte abundance | Gametophyte length | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison | Differences of means/rank | t/q/Q | Comparison | Differences of means/rank | t/q/Q | |||
| Filter experiment (T1) | Filtered versus Non-filtered | 3.89 | 2.14 | Yes | Filtered versus Non-filtered | 0.03 | 2.31 | Yes |
| Filter experiment (T2) | Filtered versus Non-filtered | 15.67 | 3.59 | Yes | Filtered versus Non-filtered | 0.06 | 10.73 | Yes |
| Antibiotic experiment | Str versus Control | 15.22 | 5.35 | Yes | Amp versus Control | 93.34 | 6.61 | Yes |
| Str versus Kana | 8.89 | 3.13 | Amp versus Kana | 46.43 | 3.04 | Yes | ||
| Str versus Amp | 3.33 | 1.17 | Amp versus Str | 14.63 | 1.07 | |||
| Amp versus Control | 11.89 | 4.18 | Yes | Str versus Control | 78.71 | 6.50 | Yes | |
| Amp versus Kana | 5.56 | 1.95 | Str versus Kana | 31.79 | 2.36 | |||
| Kana versus Control | 6.33 | 2.23 | Kana versus Control | 46.91 | 3.38 | Yes | ||
| Point Loma microbes | Low versus High | 10.50 | 15.06 | Yes | Low versus High | 97.00 | 10.63 | Yes |
| Low versus Env | 9.00 | 12.91 | Yes | Low versus Env | 74.75 | 6.55 | Yes | |
| Low versus Int | 7.50 | 10.76 | Yes | Low versus Int | 41.32 | 3.83 | Yes | |
| Int versus High | 3.00 | 4.30 | Yes | Int versus High | 55.67 | 5.50 | Yes | |
| Int versus Env | 1.50 | 2.15 | Int versus Env | 33.42 | 2.73 | Yes | ||
| Env versus High | 1.50 | 2.15 | Env versus High | 22.24 | 2.06 | |||
| Catalina microbes | Int versus High | 12.17 | 15.53 | Yes | Int versus High | 99.04 | 7.16 | Yes |
| Int versus Env | 5.67 | 7.23 | Yes | Int versus Env | 47.08 | 5.39 | Yes | |
| Int versus Low | 3.83 | 4.89 | Yes | Int versus Low | 43.75 | 4.79 | Yes | |
| Low versus High | 8.33 | 10.64 | Yes | Low versus High | 55.29 | 4.04 | Yes | |
| Low versus Env | 1.83 | 2.34 | Low versus Env | 3.33 | 0.39 | |||
| Env versus High | 6.50 | 8.30 | Yes | Env versus High | 51.96 | 3.88 | Yes | |