| Literature DB >> 27895131 |
Diego A Espinosa1, Joel Vega-Rodriguez1, Yevel Flores-Garcia1, Amy R Noe2, Christian Muñoz1, Russell Coleman3, Torben Bruck3, Keith Haney3, Alex Stevens3, Diane Retallack3, Jeff Allen3, Thomas S Vedvick4, Christopher B Fox4, Steven G Reed4, Randall F Howard4, Ahmed M Salman5,6, Chris J Janse6, Shahid M Khan6, Fidel Zavala7, Gabriel M Gutierrez8.
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that immune responses against the cell-traversal protein for Plasmodium ookinetes and sporozoites (CelTOS) can inhibit parasite infection. While these studies provide important evidence toward the development of vaccines targeting this protein, it remains unknown whether these responses could engage the Plasmodium falciparum CelTOS in vivo Using a newly developed rodent malaria chimeric parasite expressing the P. falciparum CelTOS (PfCelTOS), we evaluated the protective effect of in vivo immune responses elicited by vaccination and assessed the neutralizing capacity of monoclonal antibodies specific against PfCelTOS. Mice immunized with recombinant P. falciparum CelTOS in combination with the glucopyranosyl lipid adjuvant-stable emulsion (GLA-SE) or glucopyranosyl lipid adjuvant-liposome-QS21 (GLA-LSQ) adjuvant system significantly inhibited sporozoite hepatocyte infection. Notably, monoclonal antibodies against PfCelTOS strongly inhibited oocyst development of P. falciparum and Plasmodium berghei expressing PfCelTOS in Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes. Taken together, our results demonstrate that anti-CelTOS responses elicited by vaccination or passive immunization can inhibit sporozoite and ookinete infection and impair vector transmission.Entities:
Keywords: CelTOS; malaria; parasite; transgenic; vaccine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 27895131 PMCID: PMC5278177 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00498-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Immun ISSN: 0019-9567 Impact factor: 3.441
FIG 1Immunization with PfrCelTOS inhibits sporozoite hepatocyte infection. Immunizations with 20 μg PfrCelTOS in combination with GLA-SE or GLA-LSQ conferred significant protection against challenge with chimeric PbANKA-PfCelTOS(r)PbCelTOSCelTOS parasites. Mice immunized with 5 μg PfrCelTOS and GLA-SE had only a modest reduction of liver parasite burden (46% inhibition compared to the GLA-SE control group). The graph represents the results of one experiment. Values are means ± standard errors of the means (SEM) (n = 5 mice per group; *, P < 0.05; ns, not significant).
FIG 2Polyclonal sera and monoclonal antibodies bind CelTOS on sporozoites. P. falciparum (3D7), chimeric PbANKA-PfCelTOS(r)PbCelTOSCelTOS parasites, and P. berghei (ANKA) sporozoites were stained with polyclonal sera.
FIG 3Monoclonal antibody 3C3 binds to P. falciparum ookinetes. Ookinetes were isolated from mosquito midguts 24 h after feeding on an infectious blood meal. Ookinetes were incubated with either MAb 3C3 or MAb 4D10. Anti-P. falciparum enolase antibody (34) was used as a positive control.
FIG 4Inhibition of P. falciparum oocyst formation by monoclonal antibodies. The effect MAbs 3C3 and 4D10 on P. falciparum (A) and PbANKA-PfCelTOS(r)PbCelTOSCelTOS (B) oocyst formation was determined by SMFAs and PAFAs, respectively. (A) Increasing concentrations of the antibodies were added to P. falciparum gametocyte cultures and fed to A. gambiae female mosquitoes. Control groups of mosquitoes were fed with cultures to which the anti-P. falciparum CSP monoclonal antibody 2A10 was added (35). (B) A. gambiae female mosquitoes (preantibody) were fed on mice infected with PbANKA-PfCelTOS(r)PbCelTOSCelTOS parasites. After feeding, mice were injected intravenously with 200 μg of either MAb 3C3 or MAb 4D10. A second group of mosquitoes (postantibody) were fed on the antibody-treated mice. Percent inhibition is defined as [(control median oocyst number − experimental median oocyst number)/control median oocyst number] × 100. Prevalence, percentage of infected mosquitoes. N, number of mosquitoes analyzed. Horizontal bars represent the median number of oocysts from two independent experiments for results shown in panels A and B. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni multiple-comparison test (A) or the Mann-Whitney U test (B).