| Literature DB >> 27895063 |
Takahiro Yoshizaki1, Yukari Kawano2, Osamu Noguchi3, Junko Onishi4, Reiko Teramoto5, Ayaka Sunami6, Yuri Yokoyama6, Yuki Tada2, Azumi Hida2, Fumiharu Togo7.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Our study examines differences in eating behaviour between day workers and rotating shift workers, and considers whether diurnal preference could explain the differences.Entities:
Keywords: Chronotype; Dietary habits; Diurnal preference; Rotating shift worker
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27895063 PMCID: PMC5168532 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011987
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Figure 1Flow chart of study participants.
Demographic characteristics of day workers and rotating shift workers
| Day workers | Shift workers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| n=39 | n=123 | p Values | |
| Age† (years) | 44.2±10.9 | 34.7±8.7 | <0.001 |
| Height†‡ (cm) | 156.7±5.6 | 157.5±5.5 | 0.175 |
| Weight†§ (kg) | 53.4±8.3 | 53.8±8.9 | 0.784 |
| BMI†¶ (kg/m2) | 21.7±2.7 | 21.7±3.5 | 0.676 |
| ME score†** (points) | 20.8±3.3 | 17.1±4.0 | <0.001 |
| Years of experience | |||
| Current work† (years) | 17.4±12.0 | 10.6±9.2 | 0.002 |
| Rotating shift work† (years) | 11.8±10.7 | 9.7±8.7 | 0.652 |
| Number of night shifts (day/month) | 0.0±0.0 | 7.6±3.1 | – |
| Marital status†† | |||
| Married | 32 (82)* | 50 (41)* | 0.001 |
| Unmarried or divorced | 7 (18) | 73 (59) | |
| Residential status†† | |||
| Living alone | 3 (8) | 33 (27)* | 0.014 |
| Not living alone | 36 (92)* | 90 (73) | |
| Smoking status | |||
| Yes | 4 (10) | 17 (14) | 0.785 |
| No | 35 (90) | 106 (86) | |
| Alcohol status†† | |||
| Yes | 21 (54) | 51 (41) | 0.198 |
| No | 18 (46) | 72 (59) | |
Values are means±SD or number (%).
*p<0.05.
†Mann-Whitney U test.
‡Shift workers, n=120.
§Shift workers, n=118.
**A lower ME score is indicative of the evening type.
††χ2 test or Fisher's exact test (When p<0.05, standardised residuals were determined for each cell.).
BMI, body mass index; ME score, Morningness–Eveningness score.
Scores for habitual eating behaviour in day workers and rotating shift workers
| Normal | Day workers | Shift workers | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Ref. 23) | n=39 | n=123 | Cohen's d | p Values | |
| Cognition of constitution*† (points) | 14 | 14.3±3.4 | 13.6±3.7 | 0.328 | |
| Motivation for eating‡§ (points) | 18 | 19.5±4.9 | 18.8±5.6 | 0.384 | |
| Eating as a diversion‡¶ (points) | 7 | 7.4±2.4 | 7.1±2.9 | 0.310 | |
| Feeling of satiety‡ (points) | 10 | 10.9±3.1 | 11.3±3.2 | 0.13 | 0.427 |
| Eating style‡ (points) | 9 | 9.8±3.5 | 9.7±3.6 | 0.629 | |
| Meal contents‡ (points) | 12 | 13.9±3.9 | 15.6±4.5 | 0.39 | 0.045 |
| Temporal eating patterns‡** (points) | 16 | 16.5±4.5 | 19.5±4.8 | 0.63 | 0.001 |
Values are means±SD.
Higher scores indicate more improper eating behaviour in terms of a higher probability of obesity: Cognition of weight and constitution, having false recognition of and assumptions about reasons for weight gain; Motivation for eating, having behavioural factors which can induce over-eating; Eating as a diversion, being subject to psychological factors which increase appetite (ie, perceived mental stress); Feeling of satiety, being prone to have an appetite and to eat as much as possible; Eating style, being prone to eat fast; Meal contents, having a preference for a high fat diet and sweets (eg, confectioneries and sweet buns); Temporal eating patterns, irregularity of timing and number of meals taken during the day and delay in timing of meals.
*t-test.
‡Mann-Whitney U test.
§Shift workers, n=122.
¶Day workers, n=38.
**Shift workers, n=119.
Association of current shift schedule (rotating shift work) and diurnal preference with scores for meal contents and temporal eating patterns in multivariate linear regression models
| Unstandardised coefficients | Standardised coefficients | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent variables | B | SE | β | p Values |
| Crude | ||||
| Rotating shift work | 1.689 | 0.804 | 0.164 | 0.037 |
| ME score | 0.082 | 0.007 | ||
| Model 1 | ||||
| Rotating shift work | 1.007 | 0.862 | 0.098 | 0.245 |
| ME score | 0.089 | 0.041 | ||
| Model 2* | ||||
| Rotating shift work | 1.486 | 1.441 | 0.144 | 0.304 |
| ME score | 0.106 | 0.051 | ||
| Shift work×ME score | 0.222 | 0.247 | 0.100 | 0.371 |
| Crude | ||||
| Rotating shift work | 3.211 | 0.867 | 0.284 | <0.001 |
| ME score | 0.086 | <0.001 | ||
| Model 1 | ||||
| Rotating shift work | 1.698 | 0.897 | 0.150 | 0.060 |
| ME score | 0.093 | <0.001 | ||
| Model 2* | ||||
| Rotating shift work | 1.426 | 1.500 | 0.126 | 0.342 |
| ME score | 0.110 | <0.001 | ||
| Shift work×ME score | 0.255 | 0.811 | ||
*Adjusted by age, years of experience as a rotating shift worker, marital status, residential status, smoking status, alcohol status and number of night shifts during the previous month. Years of experience in the current work schedule were not included in model 2 because of a high level of multicollinearity (Variance inflation factor=8.101).
Figure 2The relationship between the Morningness–Eveningness (ME) score and the meal contents and temporal eating patterns scores.