Literature DB >> 27894707

Missteps in Current Estimates of Cancer Overdiagnosis.

Christoph I Lee1, Ruth Etzioni2.   

Abstract

The balance between the benefits and harms of imaging-based cancer screening continues to be an area of controversy and widespread media attention. Of the potential harms, overdiagnosis from screening is likely the most elusive in estimating and quantifying. This article describes the major methodological issues with recently reported estimates of overdiagnosis that are based on excess cancer incidence, and suggests that modeling focused on tumor lead-time can serve as a complementary method for excess incidence-based overdiagnosis estimates. Radiologists should be conversant on the topic of overdiagnosis and understand the limitations of different methods used to estimate its magnitude.
Copyright © 2017 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Overdiagnosis; cancer screening; mammography; overtreatment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27894707      PMCID: PMC5237398          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  31 in total

1.  Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program.

Authors:  Mette Kalager; Hans-Olov Adami; Michael Bretthauer; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Counterpoint: Overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert A Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Overdiagnosis in breast cancer: design and methods of estimation in observational studies.

Authors:  Donella Puliti; Guido Miccinesi; Eugenio Paci
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Race-specific impact of natural history, mammography screening, and adjuvant treatment on breast cancer mortality rates in the United States.

Authors:  Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Clyde B Schechter; Aimee M Near; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Michael A Stoto; Gerrit Draisma; Harry J de Koning; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Estimates of overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer associated with screening mammography.

Authors:  Stephen Morrell; Alexandra Barratt; Les Irwig; Kirsten Howard; Corné Biesheuvel; Bruce Armstrong
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 6.  Effects of study methods and biases on estimates of invasive breast cancer overdetection with mammography screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Corné Biesheuvel; Alexandra Barratt; Kirsten Howard; Nehmat Houssami; Les Irwig
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 7.  Interpreting overdiagnosis estimates in population-based mammography screening.

Authors:  Rianne de Gelder; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Jacques Fracheboud; Gerrit Draisma; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.222

8.  Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: estimates of overdiagnosis from two trials of mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Stephen W Duffy; Olorunsola Agbaje; Laszlo Tabar; Bedrich Vitak; Nils Bjurstam; Lena Björneld; Jonathan P Myles; Jane Warwick
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Overdiagnosis in screening mammography in Denmark: population based cohort study.

Authors:  Sisse Helle Njor; Anne Helene Olsen; Mogens Blichert-Toft; Walter Schwartz; Ilse Vejborg; Elsebeth Lynge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-02-26

10.  Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial.

Authors:  Anthony B Miller; Claus Wall; Cornelia J Baines; Ping Sun; Teresa To; Steven A Narod
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-02-11
View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of New Technology Adoption on Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Christoph I Lee; Janie M Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Optimal Screening in Breast Cancer Survivors With Dense Breasts on Mammography.

Authors:  Habib Rahbar; Janie M Lee; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 50.717

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.