Literature DB >> 2789449

Renal calculi in spinal cord-injured patient: association with reflux, bladder stones, and foley catheter drainage.

M K Hall1, R H Hackler, T A Zampieri, J B Zampieri.   

Abstract

Renal units associated with reflux in the spinal cord-injured (SCI) patient have a greater incidence of kidney stones developing than in the nonrefluxing units. It is logical to assume that SCI patients with persistent reflux and bladder stones treated with cystolitholapaxy would be at even higher risk for kidney stones developing. Of the 898 SCI patients studied (1,793 renal units), in 14.8 percent kidney stones developed. Kidney stones occurred in 161 of 1,517 (10.6%) of nonrefluxing units. Of the 276 renal units with reflux, in 104 (37.7%) an ipsilateral stone developed. Of the 198 patients in whom a kidney stone formed, 56.6 percent managed their bladder with a Foley catheter whereas only 28 percent of 700 patients in whom a stone did not form used a Foley catheter. On evaluating 261 patients (520 renal units) with bladder stones treated with cystolitholapaxy, 62.5 percent of these patients were managed with a Foley catheter. The association between cystolitholapaxy treatment, reflux, and the formation of kidney stones was (1) in 22 of 111 (19.8%) refluxing units, an ipsilateral stone formed; (2) in 70 of 409 (17.1%) units that were nonrefluxing, stones developed; and (3) overall, in 92 (17.7%) renal units, kidney stone developed. We concluded that kidney stone development is significantly increased in the SCI patient with reflux and/or Foley catheter drainage. From these data cystolitholapaxy treatment in the presence of reflux does not appear to increase the development of kidney stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2789449     DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(89)90245-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

1.  Vesicostomy in adult meningomyelocele patients. Reappraisal of an old technique.

Authors:  J Pannek
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Is submucosal bladder pressure monitoring feasible?

Authors:  Anisha S Basu; Steve Majerus; Elizabeth Ferry; Iryna Makovey; Hui Zhu; Margot S Damaser
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 1.617

Review 3.  Surgical management of urolithiasis in spinal cord injury patients.

Authors:  Philippe Nabbout; Gennady Slobodov; Daniel J Culkin
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  The change in upper tract urolithiasis composition, surgical treatments and outcomes of para and quadriplegic patients over time.

Authors:  Marisa M Clifton; Matthew T Gettman; David E Patterson; Laureano Rangel; Amy E Krambeck
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 5.  Urolithiasis following urinary diversion.

Authors:  Jai H Seth; Joannis Promponas; Marios Hadjipavlou; Faqar Anjum; Seshadri Sriprasad
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 6.  Management of the neurogenic bladder in the female patient.

Authors:  David A Ginsberg
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.862

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.