Literature DB >> 27894147

Reliability, Concurrent Validity, and Minimal Detectable Change for iPhone Goniometer App in Assessing Knee Range of Motion.

Saurabh P Mehta1,2, Katherine Barker1, Brett Bowman3, Heather Galloway4, Nicole Oliashirazi2, Ali Oliashirazi2.   

Abstract

Much of the published works assessing the reliability of smartphone goniometer apps (SG) have poor generalizability since the reliability was assessed in healthy subjects. No research has established the values for standard error of measurement (SEM) or minimal detectable change (MDC) which have greater clinical utility to contextualize the range of motion (ROM) assessed using the SG. This research examined the test-retest reproducibility, concurrent validity, SEM, and MDC values for the iPhone goniometer app (i-Goni; June Software Inc., v.1.1, San Francisco, CA) in assessing knee ROM in patients with knee osteoarthritis or those after total knee replacement. A total of 60 participants underwent data collection which included the assessment of active knee ROM using the i-Goni and the universal goniometer (UG; EZ Read Jamar Goniometer, Patterson Medical, Warrenville, IL), knee muscle strength, and assessment of pain and lower extremity disability using quadruple numeric pain rating scale (Q-NPRS) and lower extremity functional scale (LEFS), respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess the reproducibility of the knee ROM assessed using the i-Goni and UG. Bland and Altman technique examined the agreement between these knee ROM. The SEM and MDC values were calculated for i-Goni assessed knee ROM to characterize the error in a single score and the index of true change, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficient examined concurrent relationships between the i-Goni and other measures. The ICC values for the knee flexion/extension ROM were superior for i-Goni (0.97/0.94) compared with the UG (0.95/0.87). The SEM values were smaller for i-Goni assessed knee flexion/extension (2.72/1.18 degrees) compared with UG assessed knee flexion/extension (3.41/1.62 degrees). Similarly, the MDC values were smaller for both these ROM for the i-Goni (6.3 and 2.72 degrees) suggesting smaller change required to infer true change in knee ROM. The i-Goni assessed knee ROM showed expected concurrent relationships with UG, knee muscle strength, Q-NPRS, and the LEFS. In conclusion, the i-Goni demonstrated superior reproducibility with smaller measurement error compared with UG in assessing knee ROM in the recruited cohort. Future research can expand the inquiry for assessing the reliability of the i-Goni to other joints. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27894147     DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  12 in total

Review 1.  Wearable Inertial Sensor Systems for Lower Limb Exercise Detection and Evaluation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Martin O'Reilly; Brian Caulfield; Tomas Ward; William Johnston; Cailbhe Doherty
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Predictive factors for failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction via the trans-tibial technique.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Yong-Beom Park; Dong-Hyun Kim; Nicolas Pujol; Han-Jun Lee
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Valgus Control Feedback and Taping Improves the Effects of Plyometric Exercises in Women With Dynamic Knee Valgus.

Authors:  Fereshteh Shams; Malihe Hadadnezhad; Amir Letafatkar; Jennifer Hogg
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 4.355

4.  Preoperative exercise in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Pascale Gränicher; Thomas Stöggl; Sandro F Fucentese; Rolf Adelsberger; Jaap Swanenburg
Journal:  Arch Physiother       Date:  2020-08-05

5.  Validity and reliability of inertial sensors for elbow and wrist range of motion assessment.

Authors:  Vanina Costa; Óscar Ramírez; Abraham Otero; Daniel Muñoz-García; Sandra Uribarri; Rafael Raya
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Smartphone Inclinometry Is a Valid and Reliable Tool for Measuring Frontal Plane Tibial Alignment in Healthy and Osteoarthritic Knees.

Authors:  Calvin T F Tse; Jesse M Charlton; Jennifer Lam; Joanne Ho; Jessica Bears; Amanda Serek; Michael A Hunt
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2021-07-01

7.  Sensor Positioning Influences the Accuracy of Knee Rom Data of an E-Rehabilitation System: A Preliminary Study with Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Carlos J Marques; Christian Bauer; Dafne Grimaldo; Steffen Tabeling; Timo Weber; Alexander Ehlert; Alexandre H Mendes; Juergen Lorenz; Frank Lampe
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Reliability and validity of clinically accessible smartphone applications to measure joint range of motion: A systematic review.

Authors:  Justin W L Keogh; Alistair Cox; Sarah Anderson; Bernard Liew; Alicia Olsen; Ben Schram; James Furness
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Possibilities, Problems, and Perspectives of Data Collection by Mobile Apps in Longitudinal Epidemiological Studies: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Florian Fischer; Sina Kleen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Extrinsic feedback from a feedback device promotes the learning of range of motion measurements.

Authors:  Kazunori Akizuki; Kaho Mitamura; Ryohei Yamamoto; Kazuto Yamaguchi; Yukari Ohashi
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2020-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.