Online and offline inferential and textual processing of poor comprehenders: Evidence from a probing method.

Numerous studies have demonstrated that poor inferential processing underlies the specific deficit of poor comprehenders. However, it is still not clear why poor comprehenders have difficulties in generating inferences while reading and whether this impairment is general or specific to one or more types of inferences. The current study employed an online probing method to examine the spontaneous immediate activation of two inference types-forward-predictive inferences and backward-explanatory inferences-during reading. In addition, we examined the ability of poor comprehenders to retain, suppress, and reactivate text information (relevant for inferencing) in working memory. The participants, 10- to 12-year-old good and poor comprehenders, read short narratives and name inference or text word probes following a predictive, intervening, or bridging sentence. Comparing the size of probe-naming facilitations revealed that poor comprehenders generate predictive inferences, albeit more slowly than good comprehenders, and generate explanatory inferences to a lesser extent than good comprehenders. Moreover, we found that this inferior inferential processing is presumably a result of poor retention and reactivation of inference-evoking text information during reading. Finally, poorer reading comprehension was associated with higher activation of information when it was less relevant following the intervening sentences. Taken together, the current findings demonstrate the manner in which poor regulation of relevant and less relevant information during reading underlies the specific comprehension difficulties experienced by poor comprehenders.