Literature DB >> 27893185

Women's Pathways to Abortion Care in South Carolina: A Qualitative Study of Obstacles and Supports.

Judy Margo1, Lois McCloskey2, Gouri Gupte3, Melanie Zurek4, Seema Bhakta5, Emily Feinberg6.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Women seeking timely and affordable abortion care may face myriad challenges, including high out-of-pocket costs, transportation demands, scheduling difficulties and stigma. State-level regulations may exacerbate these burdens and impede women's access to a full range of care. Women's reports of their experiences can inform efforts to improve pathways to abortion care.
METHODS: In 2014, semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with 45 women obtaining abortions in South Carolina, which has a restrictive abortion environment. Interviews elicited information about women's pathways to abortion, including how they learned about and obtained care, whether they received professional referrals, and the supports and obstacles they experienced. Transcripts were examined using thematic analysis to identify key themes along the pathways, and a process map was constructed to depict women's experiences.
RESULTS: Twenty participants reported having had contact with a health professional or crisis pregnancy center staff for pregnancy confirmation, and seven of them received an abortion referral. Women located abortion clinics through online searches, previous experience, and friends or family. Financial strain was the most frequently cited obstacle, followed by transportation challenges. Women reported experiencing emotional strain, stress and stigma, and described the value of receiving social support. Because of financial pressures, the regulation with the greatest impact was the one prohibiting most insurance plans from covering abortion care.
CONCLUSIONS: Further research on experiences of women seeking abortion services, and how these individuals are affected by evolving state policy environments, will help shape initiatives to support timely, affordable and safe abortion care in a climate of increasing restrictions.
Copyright © 2016 by the Guttmacher Institute.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27893185     DOI: 10.1363/psrh.12006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health        ISSN: 1538-6341


  6 in total

1.  Impact of Insurance Coverage for Abortion in Hawai'i on Gestational Age at Presentation and Type of Abortion, 2010-2013.

Authors:  Shandhini Raidoo; Mary Tschann; Bliss Kaneshiro; Tetine Sentell
Journal:  Hawaii J Health Soc Welf       Date:  2020-04-01

2.  Quality of Information Available Online for Abortion Self-Referral.

Authors:  Laura E Dodge; Sharon J Phillips; Dayna T Neo; Siripanth Nippita; Maureen E Paul; Michele R Hacker
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  Why does abortion stigma matter? A scoping review and hybrid analysis of qualitative evidence illustrating the role of stigma in the quality of abortion care.

Authors:  Annik Mahalia Sorhaindo; Antonella Francheska Lavelanet
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Experiences of women who travel for abortion: A mixed methods systematic review.

Authors:  Jill Barr-Walker; Ruvani T Jayaweera; Ana Maria Ramirez; Caitlin Gerdts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Racial/Ethnic Differences in Unwanted Pregnancy: Moderation by Sexual Orientation.

Authors:  Bethany G Everett; Stefanie Mollborn; Virginia Jenkins; Aubrey Limburg; Lisa M Diamond
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2020-01-10

Review 6.  The microeconomics of abortion: A scoping review and analysis of the economic consequences for abortion care-seekers.

Authors:  Ernestina Coast; Samantha R Lattof; Yana van der Meulen Rodgers; Brittany Moore; Cheri Poss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.