IMPORTANCE: Myasthenia gravis (MG), an autoimmune disorder of neuromuscular transmission, is treated by an array of immunotherapeutics, many of which are nonspecific. Even with current therapies, a subset of patients has medically refractory MG. The benefits of B-cell-targeted therapy with rituximab have been observed in MG; however, the duration of these benefits after treatment is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the durability of response to rituximab in the treatment of acetylcholine receptor autoantibody-positive (AChR+) generalized MG. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective case series study included 16 patients with AChR+ MG referred to an MG clinic from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2015. The patients were treated with rituximab and followed up for 18 to 84 months after treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Assessment of long-term clinical response, durability of response and/or relapse rate, AChR autoantibody levels, adverse effects, and inflammatory markers. RESULTS: In the 16 patients (6 men and 10 women; median age, 42 [range, 18-69] years), clinical improvement was observed in parallel with complete withdrawal or reduction of other immunotherapies, with all patients achieving complete stable remission, pharmacologic remission, or minimal manifestations based on the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America postintervention status criteria. Nine patients (56%) had a relapse during a mean follow-up of 36 (range, 24-47) months. Seven patients (44%) remained relapse free with a mean follow-up of 47 (range, 18-81) months since the last rituximab treatment. All values were normalized to a pretreatment anti-AChR antibody level of 100% and the mean levels after each rituximab cycle were calculated. A 33% decrease was seen after cycle 1 of rituximab treatment (100% vs 67%; P = .004); 20% after cycle 2 (compared with cycle 1) (67% vs 47%; P = .008); and 17% after cycle 3 (compared with cycle 2) (47% vs 30%; P = .02). However, the serum cytokine levels measured were found to be unchanged. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Rituximab therapy appears to be an effective option in patients with refractory AChR+ MG, who were observed to have a durable response after treatment. Identification of markers of disease relapse and sustained remission are critical next steps in the development of pathophysiology-relevant, evidence-based practice parameters for rituximab in the treatment of MG.
IMPORTANCE: Myasthenia gravis (MG), an autoimmune disorder of neuromuscular transmission, is treated by an array of immunotherapeutics, many of which are nonspecific. Even with current therapies, a subset of patients has medically refractory MG. The benefits of B-cell-targeted therapy with rituximab have been observed in MG; however, the duration of these benefits after treatment is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the durability of response to rituximab in the treatment of acetylcholine receptor autoantibody-positive (AChR+) generalized MG. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective case series study included 16 patients with AChR+ MG referred to an MG clinic from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2015. The patients were treated with rituximab and followed up for 18 to 84 months after treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Assessment of long-term clinical response, durability of response and/or relapse rate, AChR autoantibody levels, adverse effects, and inflammatory markers. RESULTS: In the 16 patients (6 men and 10 women; median age, 42 [range, 18-69] years), clinical improvement was observed in parallel with complete withdrawal or reduction of other immunotherapies, with all patients achieving complete stable remission, pharmacologic remission, or minimal manifestations based on the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America postintervention status criteria. Nine patients (56%) had a relapse during a mean follow-up of 36 (range, 24-47) months. Seven patients (44%) remained relapse free with a mean follow-up of 47 (range, 18-81) months since the last rituximab treatment. All values were normalized to a pretreatment anti-AChR antibody level of 100% and the mean levels after each rituximab cycle were calculated. A 33% decrease was seen after cycle 1 of rituximab treatment (100% vs 67%; P = .004); 20% after cycle 2 (compared with cycle 1) (67% vs 47%; P = .008); and 17% after cycle 3 (compared with cycle 2) (47% vs 30%; P = .02). However, the serum cytokine levels measured were found to be unchanged. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Rituximab therapy appears to be an effective option in patients with refractory AChR+ MG, who were observed to have a durable response after treatment. Identification of markers of disease relapse and sustained remission are critical next steps in the development of pathophysiology-relevant, evidence-based practice parameters for rituximab in the treatment of MG.
Authors: Susanna Brauner; Ann Eriksson-Dufva; Max Albert Hietala; Thomas Frisell; Rayomand Press; Fredrik Piehl Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: John S Yi; Jeffrey T Guptill; Panos Stathopoulos; Richard J Nowak; Kevin C O'Connor Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2017-09-30 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: Ruoyi Jiang; Miriam L Fichtner; Kenneth B Hoehn; Minh C Pham; Panos Stathopoulos; Richard J Nowak; Steven H Kleinstein; Kevin C O'Connor Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2020-07-23
Authors: Marinos C Dalakas; Goran Rakocevic; James M Dambrosia; Harry Alexopoulos; Beverly McElroy Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2017-08-09 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Ruoyi Jiang; Kenneth B Hoehn; Casey S Lee; Minh C Pham; Robert J Homer; Frank C Detterbeck; Inmaculada Aban; Leslie Jacobson; Angela Vincent; Richard J Nowak; Henry J Kaminski; Steven H Kleinstein; Kevin C O'Connor Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-11-16 Impact factor: 11.205