Alpana Garg1, Vanita Suri2, Raje Nijhawan3, Neelam Aggarwal4, Ritu Aggarwal5, Charu Guleria6, Mili Thakur7. 1. Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research , Chandigarh, India . 2. Professor and Head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research , Chandigarh, India . 3. Professor, Department of Cytology and Gynaecology Pathology, Post graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research , Chandigarh, India . 4. Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research , Chandigarh, India . 5. Associate Professor, Department of Immunopathology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research , Chandigarh, India . 6. Ph.D Student, Department of Immunopathology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research , Chandigarh, India . 7. Fellow, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine , Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA; Division of Genetic and Metabolic Disorders, Department of Pediatrics and Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan. 48201, USA .
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Assessment of high-risk Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) prevalence is important for monitoring long-term decrease in cervical cancer after implementation of the prophylactic HPV vaccination. AIM: To determine the prevalence of high-risk HPV infection and cytological abnormalities in young primiparous women in the age group of 16-26years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 214 primiparous women aged 16-26years were recruited from a public tertiary health care center postpartum clinic between June 2013 and May 2014. Cytological analysis was performed by Pap smear test and patients underwent sampling with cervical brushes for HPV-DNA detection and typing by a PCR-based assay for HPV types 16, 18, 33 and 45. RESULTS: High-risk HPV was detected in 41 (19.2%) women. HPV 16 was found to be most prevalent with 17 (7.9%) samples testing positive, followed by HPV 18 in nine (4.2%), HPV 45 in six (2.8%) and HPV 31 in four (1.8%) women. Five women tested positive for more than one HPV types. There were no cases of intraepithelial lesions or cervical cancer. One patient who had Atypical Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASCUS) on cytology tested negative for all four HPV genotypes. CONCLUSION: This study provides a geographic baseline data of high-risk HPV prevalence in young Indian women before implementation of a vaccination program. The results are important for comparison with other global regions and monitoring the effect of HPV vaccination.
INTRODUCTION: Assessment of high-risk Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) prevalence is important for monitoring long-term decrease in cervical cancer after implementation of the prophylactic HPV vaccination. AIM: To determine the prevalence of high-risk HPV infection and cytological abnormalities in young primiparous women in the age group of 16-26years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 214 primiparous women aged 16-26years were recruited from a public tertiary health care center postpartum clinic between June 2013 and May 2014. Cytological analysis was performed by Pap smear test and patients underwent sampling with cervical brushes for HPV-DNA detection and typing by a PCR-based assay for HPV types 16, 18, 33 and 45. RESULTS: High-risk HPV was detected in 41 (19.2%) women. HPV 16 was found to be most prevalent with 17 (7.9%) samples testing positive, followed by HPV 18 in nine (4.2%), HPV 45 in six (2.8%) and HPV 31 in four (1.8%) women. Five women tested positive for more than one HPV types. There were no cases of intraepithelial lesions or cervical cancer. One patient who had Atypical Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASCUS) on cytology tested negative for all four HPV genotypes. CONCLUSION: This study provides a geographic baseline data of high-risk HPV prevalence in young Indian women before implementation of a vaccination program. The results are important for comparison with other global regions and monitoring the effect of HPV vaccination.
Authors: Elmar A Joura; Anna R Giuliano; Ole-Erik Iversen; Celine Bouchard; Constance Mao; Jesper Mehlsen; Edson D Moreira; Yuen Ngan; Lone Kjeld Petersen; Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce; Punnee Pitisuttithum; Jaime Alberto Restrepo; Gavin Stuart; Linn Woelber; Yuh Cheng Yang; Jack Cuzick; Suzanne M Garland; Warner Huh; Susanne K Kjaer; Oliver M Bautista; Ivan S F Chan; Joshua Chen; Richard Gesser; Erin Moeller; Michael Ritter; Scott Vuocolo; Alain Luxembourg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Proma Paul; Amanda E Tanner; Patti E Gravitt; K Vijayaraghavan; Keerti V Shah; Gregory D Zimet; Catch Study Group Journal: Health Care Women Int Date: 2013-04-23
Authors: S Franceschi; R Rajkumar; P J F Snijders; A Arslan; C Mahé; M Plummer; R Sankaranarayanan; J Cherian; C J L M Meijer; E Weiderpass Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2005-02-14 Impact factor: 7.640