| Literature DB >> 27891159 |
Xiao Lei Liu1, Shihui Chen2, Yongtai Wang3.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of Health Qigong on the treatment and releasing symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Fifty-four moderate PD patients (N = 54) were randomly divided into experimental and control groups. Twenty-eight PD patients were placed in the experimental group in which the prescribed medication plus Health Qigong exercise will be used as intervention. The other 26 PD patients as the control group were treated only with regular medication. Ten-week intervention had been conducted for the study, and participants completed the scheduled exercises 5 times per week for 60 minutes each time (10 minutes for warm-up, 40 minutes for the exercise, and 10 minutes for cooldown). Data which included the muscle hardness, one-legged blind balance, physical coordination, and stability was collected before, during, and after the intervention. Comparisons were made between the experimental and control groups through the Repeated Measures ANOVA. The results showed that PD patients demonstrate a significant improvement in muscle hardness, the timed "up and go," balance, and hand-eye coordination (the turn-over-jars test). There were no significant differences between the two groups in gender, age, and course of differences (P < 0.05). The study concluded that Health Qigong exercises could reduce the symptoms of Parkinson's disease and improve the body functions of PD patients in both the mild and moderate stages. It can be added as an effective treatment of rehabilitation therapy for PD.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27891159 PMCID: PMC5116525 DOI: 10.1155/2016/5935782
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
The muscle hardness testing of the pronator teres on left and right sides during pretest, interim test, and posttest between the two groups (N/m).
| Control group ( | Experimental group ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Interim | Post | Pre | Interim | Post | |
| Left | 257.28 ± 39.08 | 256.72 ± 38.59 | 252.67 ± 40.05 | 280.00 ± 55.30 | 251.17 ± 38.29 | 217.48 ± 26.35 |
| Right | 263.39 ± 57.23 | 270.78 ± 62.83 | 262.17 ± 61.54 | 284.35 ± 61.33 | 245.39 ± 40.72 | 229.96 ± 35.73 |
Note: ∗∗ is represented as P < 0.01, very significant.
The hand-eye coordination test results on the right and left sides (s).
| Control group ( | Experimental group ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Interim | Post | Pre | Interim | Post | |
| Left | 9.00 ± 4.90 | 8.68 ± 4.39 | 8.51 ± 3.50 | 8.05 ± 2.90 | 6.94 ± 3.38 | 6.45 ± 3.46 |
| Right | 7.26 ± 2.19 | 7.51 ± 2.24 | 7.66 ± 1.93 | 8.19 ± 4.34 | 6.49 ± 1.42 | 6.22 ± 2.35 |
Note: ∗ is represented as P < 0.05, significant.
Figure 1The value of left muscle hardness between control and experimental groups.
Figure 2The value of left hand-eye coordination test between control and experimental groups.
Figure 3The value of left hand-eye coordination test between control and experimental groups.
Figure 4The value of right hand-eye coordination test between control and experimental groups.
The timed “up and go” test results on the right and left sides (s).
| Group | Pre | Interim | Post |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | 11.19 ± 0.60 | 6.40 ± 0.53 | 6.91 ± 0.41 |
| Control | 9.19 ± 0.68 | 8.96 ± 0.60 | 9.09 ± 0.46 |
| Experimental and control | 10.19 ± 0.45 | 7.68 ± 0.40 | 8.00 ± 0.31 |
Note: ∗ is represented as P < 0.05, significant; ∗∗ is represented as P < 0.01, very significant.
The timed “up and go” test results between the control and experimental group (s).
| Control group ( | Experimental group ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Interim | Post | Pre | Interim | Post | |
| Time | 9.19 ± 2.97 | 8.95 ± 2.81 | 9.09 ± 2.51 | 11.19 ± 2.78 | 6.40 ± 2.27 | 6.92 ± 1.38 |
Note: ∗∗ is represented as P < 0.01, very significant.
Figure 5The results of right timed “up and go” test between the control and experimental groups.
The physical stability results on the right and left sides.
| Control group ( | Experimental group ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Interim | Post | Pre | Interim | Post | |
| Left | 2.67 ± 1.46 | 3.17 ± 1.86 | 2.78 ± 1.66 | 3.35 ± 1.77 | 3.78 ± 2.88 | 3.87 ± 1.89 |
| Right | 2.94 ± 1.83 | 3.00 ± 1.78 | 2.94 ± 1.76 | 3.52 ± 1.83 | 3.87 ± 1.55 | 3.96 ± 2.03 |
Figure 6The results of left stability between control and experimental groups.
Figure 7The results of right stability between control and experimental groups.
One-legged blind balance test on the right and left sides (s).
| Control group ( | Experimental group ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Interim | Post | Pre | Interim | Post | |
| Left | 7.93 ± 4.40 | 7.94 ± 4.23 | 8.25 ± 4.27 | 7.21 ± 4.51 | 9.20 ± 5.33 | 11.13 ± 8.50 |
| Right | 5.42 ± 2.83 | 5.29 ± 2.99 | 5.60 ± 2.89 | 6.93 ± 3.93 | 9.36 ± 5.44 | 9.08 ± 4.19 |
Note: ∗ is represented as P < 0.05, significant.
Figure 8One-legged blind balance test on the left side between control and experimental groups.
Figure 9One-legged blind balance eyes test on the right side between control and experimental groups.