| Literature DB >> 27890934 |
E Young1, D Noerenberg2, L Mansouri1, V Ljungström1, M Frick2, L-A Sutton1, S J Blakemore3, J Galan-Sousa2, K Plevova4, P Baliakas1, D Rossi5,6, R Clifford7, D Roos-Weil8, V Navrkalova4, B Dörken2, C A Schmitt2, K E Smedby9, G Juliusson10, B Giacopelli11, J S Blachly11, C Belessi12, P Panagiotidis13, N Chiorazzi14, F Davi15, A W Langerak16, D Oscier17, A Schuh7, G Gaidano5, P Ghia18,19, W Xu20, L Fan20, O A Bernard8, F Nguyen-Khac15, L Rassenti21, J Li20, T J Kipps21, K Stamatopoulos1,22, S Pospisilova4, T Zenz23,24,25, C C Oakes11, J C Strefford3, R Rosenquist1, F Damm2,25,26.
Abstract
Recurrent mutations within EGR2 were recently reported in advanced-stage chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients and associated with a worse outcome. To study their prognostic impact, 2403 CLL patients were examined for mutations in the EGR2 hotspot region including a screening (n=1283) and two validation cohorts (UK CLL4 trial patients, n=366; CLL Research Consortium (CRC) patients, n=490). Targeted deep-sequencing of 27 known/postulated CLL driver genes was also performed in 38 EGR2-mutated patients to assess concurrent mutations. EGR2 mutations were detected in 91/2403 (3.8%) investigated cases, and associated with younger age at diagnosis, advanced clinical stage, high CD38 expression and unmutated IGHV genes. EGR2-mutated patients frequently carried ATM lesions (42%), TP53 aberrations (18%) and NOTCH1/FBXW7 mutations (16%). EGR2 mutations independently predicted shorter time-to-first-treatment (TTFT) and overall survival (OS) in the screening cohort; they were confirmed associated with reduced TTFT and OS in the CRC cohort and independently predicted short OS from randomization in the UK CLL4 cohort. A particularly dismal outcome was observed among EGR2-mutated patients who also carried TP53 aberrations. In summary, EGR2 mutations were independently associated with an unfavorable prognosis, comparable to CLL patients carrying TP53 aberrations, suggesting that EGR2-mutated patients represent a new patient subgroup with very poor outcome.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27890934 DOI: 10.1038/leu.2016.359
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leukemia ISSN: 0887-6924 Impact factor: 11.528