Literature DB >> 27890844

Validation of a Decision Tree to Streamline Infrainguinal Vein Graft Surveillance.

Reza Mofidi1, Olivia M B McBride2, Barnabas R Green3, Tracey Gatenby3, Paul Walker4, Simon Milburn4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Duplex ultrasound (DU)-based graft surveillance remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of a recently proposed decision tree in identifying high-risk grafts which would benefit from DU-based surveillance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing infrainguinal vein graft bypass from January 2008 to December 2015 were identified from the National Vascular registry and enrolled in a duplex surveillance program. An early postoperative DU was performed at a median of 6 weeks (range: 4-9 weeks). Grafts were classified into high risk or low risk based on the findings of the earliest postoperative scan and 4 established risk factors for graft failure (diabetes, smoking, infragenicular distal anastomosis, and revision bypass surgery) using a classification and regression tree (CRT). The accuracy of the CRT model was evaluated using area under receiver operator characteristic (AROC) curve.
RESULTS: About 278 vein graft bypasses were performed; 29 grafts had occluded by the first surveillance visit; 249 vein grafts were entered into surveillance. Sixty-four (23%) developed critical stenosis. Overall 30-month primary patency, primary-assisted patency, and secondary patency rates were 71.2%, 77.2%, and 80.1%, respectively. AROC for prediction of graft stenosis or occlusion was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78-87%). The sensitivity and specificity of the CRT model for prediction of graft stenosis or occlusion were 95% (95% CI: 88-98%) and 52.2% (95% CI: 45-60%).
CONCLUSIONS: A prediction model based on commonly recorded clinical variables and early postoperative DU scan is accurate at identifying grafts which are at high risk of failure. These high-risk grafts may benefit from DU-based surveillance.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27890844     DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.07.082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  1 in total

1.  Endoluminal interventions versus surgical interventions for stenosis in vein grafts following infrainguinal bypass.

Authors:  Francesco E Botelho; Daniel G Cacione; Jose Oyama Leite; Jose Cc Baptista-Silva
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.