| Literature DB >> 27890158 |
Heather E Douglas1, Magdalena Z Raban2, Scott R Walter3, Johanna I Westbrook4.
Abstract
Multi-tasking is an important skill for clinical work which has received limited research attention. Its impacts on clinical work are poorly understood. In contrast, there is substantial multi-tasking research in cognitive psychology, driver distraction, and human-computer interaction. This review synthesises evidence of the extent and impacts of multi-tasking on efficiency and task performance from health and non-healthcare literature, to compare and contrast approaches, identify implications for clinical work, and to develop an evidence-informed framework for guiding the measurement of multi-tasking in future healthcare studies. The results showed healthcare studies using direct observation have focused on descriptive studies to quantify concurrent multi-tasking and its frequency in different contexts, with limited study of impact. In comparison, non-healthcare studies have applied predominantly experimental and simulation designs, focusing on interleaved and concurrent multi-tasking, and testing theories of the mechanisms by which multi-tasking impacts task efficiency and performance. We propose a framework to guide the measurement of multi-tasking in clinical settings that draws together lessons from these siloed research efforts. Copyright ÂEntities:
Keywords: Hospital; Medical errors/prevention and control; Medical staff; Multi-tasking
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27890158 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Ergon ISSN: 0003-6870 Impact factor: 3.661