Juliane Köberlein-Neu1, Hugo Mennemann, Stefanie Hamacher, Isabel Waltering, Ulrich Jaehde, Corinna Schaffert, Olaf Rose. 1. Center for Health Economics and Health Services Research, Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal; Department of Social Work, M¨nster University of Applied Sciences; Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne; Department of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, University of M¨nster; Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Medication reviews and medication management are being used more and more around the world to improve medication safety. Both of these tools were originally conceived as pharmaceutical care activities and have recently been developed into interdisciplinary approaches. We studied the efficacy of interprofessional medication management for multimorbid patients that takes their medical conditions, but also their general living situation into account. METHODS: A comprehensive medication management was performed, which involved the collection of information on the drugs each patient took, the way they were stored, the patient's drug intake and handling, and any problems that arose with pharmacotherapy. The interventional approach was evaluated over a period of 15 months in a cluster-randomized controlled trial with a stepped wedge design. The primary endpoint was the quality of pharmacotherapy, as assessed with the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI). A mixed model was used to analyze efficacy. RESULTS:162 patients were enrolled in the study; 142 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (53.3% women, mean age 76.8 ± 6.3 years). The mean total MAI score decreased significantly (p ≤ 0.001) from the control phase (29.21, 95% CI [26.09; 32.33]) to the intervention phase (22.27 [19.00; 25.54]), with an effect strength (Cohen's d) of -0.24 [-0.36; -0.13]. The number of drug-related problems declined as well. CONCLUSION: In this study, interprofessional collaboration increased medication safety. Working across disciplinary boundaries allowed for a decrease in drugrelated problems and brought up aspects outside the purview of the primary care physician.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Medication reviews and medication management are being used more and more around the world to improve medication safety. Both of these tools were originally conceived as pharmaceutical care activities and have recently been developed into interdisciplinary approaches. We studied the efficacy of interprofessional medication management for multimorbid patients that takes their medical conditions, but also their general living situation into account. METHODS: A comprehensive medication management was performed, which involved the collection of information on the drugs each patient took, the way they were stored, the patient's drug intake and handling, and any problems that arose with pharmacotherapy. The interventional approach was evaluated over a period of 15 months in a cluster-randomized controlled trial with a stepped wedge design. The primary endpoint was the quality of pharmacotherapy, as assessed with the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI). A mixed model was used to analyze efficacy. RESULTS: 162 patients were enrolled in the study; 142 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (53.3% women, mean age 76.8 ± 6.3 years). The mean total MAI score decreased significantly (p ≤ 0.001) from the control phase (29.21, 95% CI [26.09; 32.33]) to the intervention phase (22.27 [19.00; 25.54]), with an effect strength (Cohen's d) of -0.24 [-0.36; -0.13]. The number of drug-related problems declined as well. CONCLUSION: In this study, interprofessional collaboration increased medication safety. Working across disciplinary boundaries allowed for a decrease in drugrelated problems and brought up aspects outside the purview of the primary care physician.
Authors: Meera Viswanathan; Leila C Kahwati; Carol E Golin; Susan J Blalock; Emmanuel Coker-Schwimmer; Rachael Posey; Kathleen N Lohr Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: G P Samsa; J T Hanlon; K E Schmader; M Weinberger; E C Clipp; K M Uttech; I K Lewis; P B Landsman; H J Cohen Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1994-08 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: J T Hanlon; M Weinberger; G P Samsa; K E Schmader; K M Uttech; I K Lewis; P A Cowper; P B Landsman; H J Cohen; J R Feussner Journal: Am J Med Date: 1996-04 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Janine A Cooper; Cathal A Cadogan; Susan M Patterson; Ngaire Kerse; Marie C Bradley; Cristín Ryan; Carmel M Hughes Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-12-09 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: A Marlen Schurig; Miriam Böhme; Katja S Just; Catharina Scholl; Harald Dormann; Bettina Plank-Kiegele; Thomas Seufferlein; Ingo Gräff; Matthias Schwab; Julia C Stingl Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Hélène Carrier; Anna Zaytseva; Aurélie Bocquier; Patrick Villani; Hélène Verdoux; Martin Fortin; Pierre Verger Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Joanne Reeve; Michelle Maden; Ruaraidh Hill; Amadea Turk; Kamal Mahtani; Geoff Wong; Dan Lasserson; Janet Krska; Dee Mangin; Richard Byng; Emma Wallace; Ed Ranson Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2022-07 Impact factor: 4.106
Authors: Audrey Rankin; Cathal A Cadogan; Susan M Patterson; Ngaire Kerse; Chris R Cardwell; Marie C Bradley; Cristin Ryan; Carmel Hughes Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-09-03