Literature DB >> 27889418

A Statewide Intervention Improves Appropriate Imaging in Localized Prostate Cancer.

Patrick Hurley, Apoorv Dhir, Yuqing Gao, Brian Drabik, Kenneth Lim, Jon Curry, Paul R Womble, Susan M Linsell, Andrew Brachulis, Donald W Sexton, Khurshid R Ghani, Brian T Denton, David C Miller, James E Montie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We implemented a statewide intervention to improve imaging utilization for the staging of patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MUSIC (Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative) is a quality improvement collaborative comprising 42 diverse practices representing approximately 85% of the urologists in Michigan. MUSIC has developed imaging appropriateness criteria (prostate specific antigen greater than 20 ng/ml, Gleason score 7 or higher and clinical stage T3 or higher) which minimize unnecessary imaging with bone scan and computerized tomography. After baseline rates of radiographic staging were established in 2012 and 2013, we used multidimensional interventions to deploy these criteria in 2014. Imaging utilization was then remeasured in 2015 to evaluate for changes in practice patterns.
RESULTS: A total of 10,554 newly diagnosed patients with prostate cancer were entered into the MUSIC registry from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013 and January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015. Of these patients 7,442 (79%) and 7,312 (78%) met our criteria to avoid bone scan and computerized tomography imaging, respectively. The use of bone scan imaging when not indicated decreased from 11.0% at baseline to 6.5% after interventions (p <0.0001). The use of computerized tomography when not indicated decreased from 14.7% at baseline to 7.7% after interventions (p <0.0001). Variability among practices decreased substantially after the interventions as well. The use of recommended imaging remained stable during these periods.
CONCLUSIONS: An intervention aimed at appropriate use of imaging was associated with decreased use of bone scans and computerized tomography among men at low risk for metastases.
Copyright © 2017 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone neoplasms; diagnostic imaging; neoplasm metastasis; prostatic neoplasms; quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27889418     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.11.098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

1.  Breast Cancer Disparities at Home and Abroad: A Review of the Challenges and Opportunities for System-Level Change.

Authors:  Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Benjamin O Anderson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Systematic review of interventions that improve provider compliance to imaging guidelines for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Samuel M Pettit; David Mikhail; Michael Feuerstein
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.052

Review 3.  Performance Measurement and Quality Improvement Initiatives for Bladder Cancer Care.

Authors:  Benjamin T Ristau; Marc C Smaldone
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Characterising potential bone scan overuse amongst men treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Peter S Kirk; Tudor Borza; Megan E V Caram; Dean A Shumway; Danil V Makarov; Jennifer A Burns; Jeremy B Shelton; John T Leppert; Christina Chapman; Michael Chang; Brent K Hollenbeck; Ted A Skolarus
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Prospective monitoring of imaging guideline adherence by physicians in a surgical collaborative: comparison of statistical process control methods for detecting outlying performance.

Authors:  Michael Inadomi; Karandeep Singh; Ji Qi; Rodney Dunn; Susan Linsell; Brian Denton; Patrick Hurley; Eduardo Kleer; James Montie; Khurshid R Ghani
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Understanding the multilevel determinants of clinicians' imaging decision-making: setting the stage for de-implementation of low-value imaging.

Authors:  Soohyun Hwang; Sarah A Birken; Matthew E Nielsen; Jennifer Elston-Lafata; Stephanie B Wheeler; Lisa P Spees
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 2.908

Review 7.  The past, present, and future of urological quality improvement collaboratives.

Authors:  Adam C Reese; Serge Ginzburg
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.