Lindsay G S Bengtson1, Pamela L Lutsey2, Lin Y Chen3, Richard F MacLehose2, Alvaro Alonso4. 1. Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Life Sciences, Optum, Eden Prairie, MN, USA. Electronic address: lindsay.bengtson@optum.com. 2. Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 3. Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: alvaro.alonso@emory.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Effectiveness data on novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) by prior warfarin use are limited. METHODS: We used data from the US MarketScan databases from 2009 to 2012. NVAF patients initiating dabigatran or rivaroxaban were matched with up to 5 warfarin users. Propensity score-adjusted Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for relevant endpoints in NOACs versus warfarin users. Separate analyses were conducted to compare anticoagulant-naïve users of NOACs and those switching from warfarin. RESULTS: Among 32,918 dabigatran, 3301 rivaroxaban, and 109,447 warfarin users with NVAF, 225 intracranial bleeds, 1035 ischemic strokes, 958 myocardial infarctions, and 1842 gastrointestinal bleeds were identified. Compared to warfarin users, patients initiating NOACs had similar ischemic stroke rates and lower intracranial bleeding rates, while the gastrointestinal bleeding rate was higher in dabigatran users than warfarin users. Associations of dabigatran with ischemic stroke risk differed between anticoagulant-naïve initiators and patients switching from warfarin; dabigatran was associated with lower ischemic stroke rates in naïve users (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.52-0.82) but not in switchers (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.95-1.51), compared to warfarin. Risk of stroke and bleeding was not different between rivaroxaban and warfarin users. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world effectiveness of NOACs (compared to warfarin) for diverse outcomes was comparable to efficacy reported in published clinical trials. However, harms and benefits of switching from warfarin to dabigatran need to be evaluated.
BACKGROUND: Effectiveness data on novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) by prior warfarin use are limited. METHODS: We used data from the US MarketScan databases from 2009 to 2012. NVAF patients initiating dabigatran or rivaroxaban were matched with up to 5 warfarin users. Propensity score-adjusted Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for relevant endpoints in NOACs versus warfarin users. Separate analyses were conducted to compare anticoagulant-naïve users of NOACs and those switching from warfarin. RESULTS: Among 32,918 dabigatran, 3301 rivaroxaban, and 109,447 warfarin users with NVAF, 225 intracranial bleeds, 1035 ischemic strokes, 958 myocardial infarctions, and 1842 gastrointestinal bleeds were identified. Compared to warfarin users, patients initiating NOACs had similar ischemic stroke rates and lower intracranial bleeding rates, while the gastrointestinal bleeding rate was higher in dabigatran users than warfarin users. Associations of dabigatran with ischemic stroke risk differed between anticoagulant-naïve initiators and patients switching from warfarin; dabigatran was associated with lower ischemic stroke rates in naïve users (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.52-0.82) but not in switchers (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.95-1.51), compared to warfarin. Risk of stroke and bleeding was not different between rivaroxaban and warfarin users. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world effectiveness of NOACs (compared to warfarin) for diverse outcomes was comparable to efficacy reported in published clinical trials. However, harms and benefits of switching from warfarin to dabigatran need to be evaluated.
Authors: Paul N Jensen; Karin Johnson; James Floyd; Susan R Heckbert; Ryan Carnahan; Sascha Dublin Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Craig T January; L Samuel Wann; Joseph S Alpert; Hugh Calkins; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Joseph C Cleveland; Jamie B Conti; Patrick T Ellinor; Michael D Ezekowitz; Michael E Field; Katherine T Murray; Ralph L Sacco; William G Stevenson; Patrick J Tchou; Cynthia M Tracy; Clyde W Yancy Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jonathan P Piccini; Bradley G Hammill; Moritz F Sinner; Paul N Jensen; Adrian F Hernandez; Susan R Heckbert; Emelia J Benjamin; Lesley H Curtis Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2012-01-10
Authors: Winnie W Nelson; Sunita Desai; C V Damaraju; Lang Lu; Larry E Fields; Peter Wildgoose; Jeff R Schein Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2014-09-02 Impact factor: 2.580
Authors: Robert P Giugliano; Christian T Ruff; Eugene Braunwald; Sabina A Murphy; Stephen D Wiviott; Jonathan L Halperin; Albert L Waldo; Michael D Ezekowitz; Jeffrey I Weitz; Jindřich Špinar; Witold Ruzyllo; Mikhail Ruda; Yukihiro Koretsune; Joshua Betcher; Minggao Shi; Laura T Grip; Shirali P Patel; Indravadan Patel; James J Hanyok; Michele Mercuri; Elliott M Antman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alvaro Alonso; Pamela L Lutsey; Lin Y Chen; Richard F MacLehose; Lindsay G S Bengtson Journal: J Cardiol Date: 2017-03-18 Impact factor: 3.159
Authors: Alvaro Alonso; Richard F MacLehose; Lin Y Chen; Lindsay Gs Bengtson; Alanna M Chamberlain; Faye L Norby; Pamela L Lutsey Journal: Heart Date: 2017-01-05 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Mariam Ujeyl; Ingrid Köster; Hans Wille; Thomas Stammschulte; Rebecca Hein; Sebastian Harder; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Julian Bleek; Peter Ihle; Helmut Schröder; Gerhard Schillinger; Anette Zawinell; Ingrid Schubert Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-06-16 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Pamela L Lutsey; Faye L Norby; Kristine E Ensrud; Richard F MacLehose; Susan J Diem; Lin Y Chen; Alvaro Alonso Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Stine Munk Hald; Sören Möller; Luis Alberto García Rodríguez; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Mike Sharma; Hanne Christensen; Maja Hellfritzsch; Anton Pottegård; Jesper Hallas; David Gaist Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-05-03
Authors: Pamela L Lutsey; Faye L Norby; Neil A Zakai; Richard F MacLehose; Lin Y Chen; Surbhi Shah; Yvonne H Datta; Alvaro Alonso Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 2.580