Literature DB >> 27889265

Integration of Phytochrome and Cryptochrome Signals Determines Plant Growth during Competition for Light.

Mieke de Wit1, Diederik H Keuskamp2, Franca J Bongers2, Patricia Hornitschek3, Charlotte M M Gommers2, Emilie Reinen2, Carmen Martínez-Cerón2, Christian Fankhauser3, Ronald Pierik4.   

Abstract

Plants in dense vegetation perceive their neighbors primarily through changes in light quality. Initially, the ratio between red (R) and far-red (FR) light decreases due to reflection of FR by plant tissue well before shading occurs. Perception of low R:FR by the phytochrome photoreceptors induces the shade avoidance response [1], of which accelerated elongation growth of leaf-bearing organs is an important feature. Low R:FR-induced phytochrome inactivation leads to the accumulation and activation of the transcription factors PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTORs (PIFs) 4, 5, and 7 and subsequent expression of their growth-mediating targets [2, 3]. When true shading occurs, transmitted light is especially depleted in red and blue (B) wavelengths, due to absorption by chlorophyll [4]. Although the reduction of blue wavelengths alone does not occur in nature, long-term exposure to low B light induces a shade avoidance-like response that is dependent on the cryptochrome photoreceptors and the transcription factors PIF4 and PIF5 [5-7]. We show in Arabidopsis thaliana that low B in combination with low R:FR enhances petiole elongation similar to vegetation shade, providing functional context for a low B response in plant competition. Low B potentiates the low R:FR response through PIF4PIF5, and PIF7, and it involves increased PIF5 abundance and transcriptional changes. Low B attenuates a low R:FR-induced negative feedback loop through reduced gene expression of negative regulators and reduced HFR1 levels. The enhanced response to combined phytochrome and cryptochrome inactivation shows how multiple light cues can be integrated to fine-tune the plant's response to a changing environment.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COP1; HFR1; PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR; blue light; cryptochrome; phytochrome; plant competition; red:far-red ratio; shade avoidance; signal integration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27889265     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  52 in total

1.  Low Blue Light Enhances Phototropism by Releasing Cryptochrome1-Mediated Inhibition of PIF4 Expression.

Authors:  Alessandra Boccaccini; Martina Legris; Johanna Krahmer; Laure Allenbach-Petrolati; Anupama Goyal; Carlos Galvan-Ampudia; Teva Vernoux; Elizabeth Karayekov; Jorge J Casal; Christian Fankhauser
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Linking PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR to Histone Modification in Plant Shade Avoidance.

Authors:  Maolin Peng; Zepeng Li; Nana Zhou; Mengmeng Ma; Yupei Jiang; Aiwu Dong; Wen-Hui Shen; Lin Li
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Light-mediated self-organization of sunflower stands increases oil yield in the field.

Authors:  Mónica López Pereira; Victor O Sadras; William Batista; Jorge J Casal; Antonio J Hall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Neighbor detection at the leaf tip adaptively regulates upward leaf movement through spatial auxin dynamics.

Authors:  Chrysoula K Pantazopoulou; Franca J Bongers; Jesse J Küpers; Emilie Reinen; Debatosh Das; Jochem B Evers; Niels P R Anten; Ronald Pierik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Local auxin production underlies a spatially restricted neighbor-detection response in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Olivier Michaud; Anne-Sophie Fiorucci; Ioannis Xenarios; Christian Fankhauser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Photoreceptor Activity Contributes to Contrasting Responses to Shade in Cardamine and Arabidopsis Seedlings.

Authors:  Maria Jose Molina-Contreras; Sandi Paulišić; Christiane Then; Jordi Moreno-Romero; Pedro Pastor-Andreu; Luca Morelli; Irma Roig-Villanova; Huw Jenkins; Asis Hallab; Xiangchao Gan; Aurelio Gomez-Cadenas; Miltos Tsiantis; Manuel Rodríguez-Concepción; Jaime F Martínez-García
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 7.  Light Signaling, Root Development, and Plasticity.

Authors:  Kasper van Gelderen; Chiakai Kang; Ronald Pierik
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 8.  Seedling Establishment: A Dimmer Switch-Regulated Process between Dark and Light Signaling.

Authors:  Charlotte M M Gommers; Elena Monte
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Subtle variation in shade avoidance responses may have profound consequences for plant competitiveness.

Authors:  Franca J Bongers; Ronald Pierik; Niels P R Anten; Jochem B Evers
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Rewiring of auxin signaling under persistent shade.

Authors:  Ornella Pucciariello; Martina Legris; Cecilia Costigliolo Rojas; María José Iglesias; Carlos Esteban Hernando; Carlos Dezar; Martín Vazquez; Marcelo J Yanovsky; Scott A Finlayson; Salomé Prat; Jorge J Casal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.