Literature DB >> 27889071

Using X-Ray Crystallography to Simplify and Accelerate Biologics Drug Development.

Mark L Brader1, Edward N Baker2, Michael F Dunn3, Thomas M Laue4, John F Carpenter5.   

Abstract

Every major biopharmaceutical company incorporates a protein crystallography unit that is central to its structure-based drug discovery efforts. Yet these capabilities are rarely leveraged toward the formal higher order structural characterization that is so challenging but integral to large-scale biologics manufacturing. Although the biotech industry laments the shortcomings of its favored biophysical techniques, x-ray crystallography is not even considered for drug development. Why not? We suggest that this is due, at least in part, to outdated thinking (for a recent industry-wide survey, see Gabrielson JP, Weiss IV WF. Technical decision-making with higher order structure data: starting a new dialogue. J Pharm Sci. 2015;104(4):1240-1245). We examine some myths surrounding protein crystallography and highlight the inherent properties of protein crystals (molecular identity, biochemical purity, conformational uniformity, and macromolecular crowding) as having practicable commonalities with today's patient-focused liquid drug products. In the new millennium, protein crystallography has become essentially a routine analytical test. Its application may aid the identification of better candidate molecules that are more amenable to high-concentration processing, formulation, and analysis thereby helping to make biologics drug development quicker, simpler, and cheaper.
Copyright © 2017 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biopharmaceuticals characterization; biotechnology; crystal structure; crystallization; crystallography; crystals; protein formulation; protein structure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27889071     DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  5 in total

Review 1.  The impact of structural biology in medicine illustrated with four case studies.

Authors:  Tiancen Hu; Elizabeth R Sprague; Michelle Fodor; Travis Stams; Kirk L Clark; Sandra W Cowan-Jacob
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  Charge Shielding Prevents Aggregation of Supercharged GFP Variants at High Protein Concentration.

Authors:  Joshua R Laber; Barton J Dear; Matheus L Martins; Devin E Jackson; Andrea DiVenere; Jimmy D Gollihar; Andrew D Ellington; Thomas M Truskett; Keith P Johnston; Jennifer A Maynard
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 3.  A Biopharmaceutical Perspective on Higher-Order Structure and Thermal Stability of mRNA Vaccines.

Authors:  Marek Kloczewiak; Jessica M Banks; Lin Jin; Mark L Brader
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  Crystallography and the development of therapeutic medicines.

Authors:  Edward N Baker
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 4.769

5.  Crystal Structures of PF-06438179/GP1111, an Infliximab Biosimilar.

Authors:  Thomas F Lerch; Penelope Sharpe; Stephen J Mayclin; Thomas E Edwards; Sharon Polleck; Jason C Rouse; Qin Zou; Hugh D Conlon
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.807

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.