Literature DB >> 27889044

Leadless Pacemakers.

Mikhael F El-Chami1, Faisal M Merchant2, Angel R Leon2.   

Abstract

Leadless pacing is an emerging technology with the potential to significantly improve outcomes associated with the need for long-term pacing. Specifically, the major advantage of leadless systems is abolishing the need for transvenous leads and subcutaneous pockets, both of which account for most adverse events associated with traditional pacemakers. Two leadless pacemakers are currently available: the Nanostim (leadless cardiac pacemaker [LCP]) device (St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, California) and the Micra Transcatheter pacing system (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota). These 2 pacemakers have shown promising results in clinical trials. In conclusion, in this review we summarize the results of the 2 investigational device exemption trials and compare the pros and cons of these devices to traditional transvenous pacemakers.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27889044     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  11 in total

1.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy with wireless left ventricular endocardial pacing: is this the direction to go?

Authors:  Tomas Holubec; Julius Beckers; Zdenka Holubcova; Veronika Walter; Thomas Walther
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-08

2.  A Highly Miniaturized, Chronically Implanted ASIC for Electrical Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Jay Shah; Christopher Quinkert; Brett Collar; Michael Williams; Ethan Biggs; Pedro Irazoqui
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 5.234

3.  Subacute Right Ventricular Perforation by Pacemaker Lead Causing Left-Sided Hemothorax and Epicardial Hematoma.

Authors:  Abdelrahman Ahmed; Mohamed Shokr; Randy Lieberman
Journal:  Case Rep Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-16

4.  Leadless pacemakers: a contemporary review.

Authors:  Neal Bhatia; Mikhael El-Chami
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  Comparison of Leadless Pacing and Temporary Externalized Pacing Following Cardiac Implanted Device Extraction.

Authors:  Holly Gonzales; Travis D Richardson; Jay A Montgomery; George H Crossley; Christopher R Ellis
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2019-12-15

Review 6.  Safety and Efficacy of Leadless Pacemakers: A New Era of Pacing.

Authors:  Zaid Ammari; Mubbasher Syed; Mohammad Al-Sarie; Saima Karim; Blair Grubb
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2018-07-15

7.  Visualization and appearance of artifacts of leadless pacemaker systems in cardiac MRI : An experimental ex vivo study.

Authors:  Christoph Edlinger; Marcel Granitz; Vera Paar; Christian Jung; Alexander Pfeil; Sarah Eder; Bernhard Wernly; Jürgen Kammler; Klaus Hergan; Uta C Hoppe; Clemens Steinwender; Michael Lichtenauer; Alexander Kypta
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Delivery of a Leadless Transcatheter Pacing System as First-line Therapy in a 28-kg Pediatric Patient Through Proximal Right Internal Jugular Surgical Cutdown.

Authors:  Gretchen Hackett; Faisal Aziz; Soraya Samii; Jason R Imundo
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 9.  Complications of leadless vs conventional (lead) artificial pacemakers - a retrospective review.

Authors:  Yasar Sattar; Waqas Ullah; Sohaib Roomi; Hiba Rauf; Maryam Mukhtar; Asrar Ahmad; Zain Ali; Muhammad Shan-Ul- Abedin; M Chadi Alraies
Journal:  J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect       Date:  2020-08-02

10.  Anesthetic consideration for patients with micra leadless pacemaker.

Authors:  Sathappan Karuppiah; Richard Prielipp; Ratan K Banik
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.