Literature DB >> 27888716

Family participation in intensive care unit rounds: Comparing family and provider perspectives.

Selena S Au1, Amanda Roze des Ordons2, Andrea Soo3, Simon Guienguere3, Henry T Stelfox2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe and compare intensive care unit (ICU) patient family member and provider experiences, preferences, and perceptions of family participation in ICU rounds.
METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of ICU family members and providers of patients admitted to 4 medical-surgical ICUs from September 2014 to March 2015.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 63 (62%) family members and 258 (43%) providers. Provider respondents included physicians (9%), nurses (56%), respiratory therapists (24%), and other ICU team members (11%). Although 38% of providers estimated only moderate family member interest in participating in rounds, 97% of family members expressed high interest. Family members and providers reported listening (95% vs 96%; P=.594) and sharing information about the patient (82% vs 82%; P=.995) as appropriate roles for family members during rounds, but differed in their perceptions on asking questions (75% vs 86%; P=.043) and participating in decision making (36% vs 59%; P=.003). Compared with family members, providers were more likely to perceive family participation in rounds to cause family stress (7% vs 22%; P=.020) and confusion (0% vs 28%; P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Family members and providers share some perspectives on family participation in ICU rounds although other perspectives are discordant, with implications for communication strategies and collaborative decision making.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication; Family; Intensive care units

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27888716     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  4 in total

1.  Impact of Family Presence on Delirium in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Samiha Mohsen; Stephana J Moss; Filipe Lucini; Karla D Krewulak; Henry T Stelfox; Daniel J Niven; Khara M Sauro; Kirsten M Fiest
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 9.296

2.  Parental Perceptions of Displayed Patient Data in a PICU: An Example of Unintentional Empowerment.

Authors:  Onur Asan; Matthew C Scanlon; Bradley Crotty; Richard J Holden; Kathryn E Flynn
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.624

3.  Validation and Analysis of the European Quality Questionnaire in Italian Language.

Authors:  Leopoldo M Amendola; Alessandro Galazzi; Irene Zainaghi; Ivan Cortinovis; Anna Zolin; Rik T Gerritsen; Ileana Adamini; Maura Lusignani; Dario Laquintana
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Post-intensive Care Syndrome.

Authors:  Muhammad Hanif Ahmad; Shyh Poh Teo
Journal:  Ann Geriatr Med Res       Date:  2021-06-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.